Is Bondi blowing the Epstein Investigation intentionally?

[MisterBeale]

 

[MisterBeale]

 

[MisterBeale]

 

[drudge X]

You have the Democrat taking points when it comes to Trump. No republican refers to Trump as being a savior. That's a well known Democrat talking point or bull chit narrative used.

Trump is a savior just by winning. Can you imagine the horror if Harris wins? I'll say, this country dodged a nuke.

 

[The Duke]

Isn't that how you refer to a deity?

Y U egg that on?

 

[The Duke]

When talking to some of the members on this board, they don't like answering questions about their savior.

You can ask me any questions you want about my savior. Did I ever tell you about what he said should happen to people that mislead children? What he said would be better for them than what he'd do? Because I know.

 

[pknopp]

Doesn't mean it still shouldn't be done.

Then the Democrats should have done it. They now don't have the votes to do squat so its all for show.

The obvious solution, as much as I hate it, would be to appoint an independent counsel. But it has to be someone truly independent, not a political hack like Lawrence Walsh, Ken Starr, or Patrick Fitzgerald.

Spend millions of dollars for something the Democrats could have simply done themselves last year.

 

[Care4all]

They don't have the gavel.

What's stopping her from an interview?

Her case is on appeal....she would never testify until the appeal has been decided...

Unless, she is being offered a pardon....if a federal case....by the President...in exchange for testimony???

 

[krichton]

Someone does. I'm betting that "someone" is Trump. Who is he protecting?

Himself, most likely

 

[Seth]

So James O’Keefe first “I’m not suicidal and am going off grid ‘Bombshell’” was having Pam Bondi recorded at a restaurant telling a random person that they were reviewing “tens of thousands of hours of tapes of Epstein with young girls”

On Wednesday Bondi came out publicly (after OMG sent her the recording) and said essentially the same thing

So what?!

If Bondi’s right — if there really are “tens of thousands of hours” of Epstein tapes — then we’re not talking about some disgraced financier anymore. We’re talking about a blackmail bomb that could incinerate the careers, reputations, and freedom of powerful people across multiple governments and industries.

If that’s true, of course they’d bury it. Of course witnesses would go quiet, documents would vanish, and media silence would stretch louder than a scream. You wouldn’t need a grand conspiracy — just a handful of well-placed people with everything to lose and the tools to make problems disappear.

And yeah, Epstein’s dead. That was the warm-up act. The real question now is: who’s still alive, and who’s protecting them?

 

[Delldude]

Her case is on appeal....she would never testify until the appeal has been decided...

Unless, she is being offered a pardon....if a federal case....by the President...in exchange for testimony???

DOJ is urging The Supremes to reject her appeal.

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[Delldude]

View attachment 1136480

Looks like he was right.

 

[Synthaholic]

Republicans protect pedophiles.

 

[MisterBeale]

Republicans protect pedophiles.

That is as insane a fallacy of composition as saying Democrats protect groomers.

Just because some members of a group do insane corrupt shit, doesn't mean they all do.

 

[JWBooth]

 

[Delldude]

Republicans protect pedophiles.

Dick Durban did too.

 

[dblack]

Republicans protect pedophiles.

I suspect it's something more substantial that they're protecting - the intelligence agencies that set this all up, perhaps.

 

[Delldude]

I suspect it's something more substantial that they're protecting - the intelligence agencies that set this all up, perhaps.

And the intel they still possess.

 

[dblack]

And the intel they still possess.

It seems a far more likely explanation. But that's just a guess. Could be deep-state lizard people I s'pose.