- Oct 7, 2011
- 38,401
- 4,162
- 1,130
I think this is a valid question. He has expanded the size of Government exponentially and has attacked several nations since taking office. So what do you think?
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That would be an absolute YES. just like Bush was a socialist who using tax payers money bailed out banks and other corporations. according to the media the difference is colorfull.Is Barack Obama A Big Government Neocon? Yes or No?
That would be an absolute YES. just like Bush was a socialist who using tax payers money bailed out banks and other corporations. according to the media the difference is colorfull.Is Barack Obama A Big Government Neocon? Yes or No?
I think this is a valid question. He has expanded the size of Government exponentially and has attacked several nations since taking office. So what do you think?
I think this is a valid question. He has expanded the size of Government exponentially and has attacked several nations since taking office. So what do you think?
I think it's a valid question and my answer is no. Yes, he has expanded government and yes he started two additional wars but there is more to being a NeoCon than that.
He's a typical progressive.
Not much 'diff' between most GOP/DNC candidates now a days. The rank & file GOP constituency are of about the same ideology... they have a love affair with big government.
You really should have defined the context of "Neocon". I read thru wiki and got about 20 different things that they do, but nothing precise. If you mean a guy with conservative foreign policies and liberal domestic policies, then yes. If you mean Libertarian-lite, then no.
The problem BO has is that as the Debt grows, he simply is being painted into a corner as far as things he can actually do. A BO with no money is a lot different than a BO with no spending limits. Maybe the OP needs to consider what he "Can actually do" as opposed to what he "would like to do".
I think this is a valid question. He has expanded the size of Government exponentially and has attacked several nations since taking office. So what do you think?
I think it's a valid question and my answer is no. Yes, he has expanded government and yes he started two additional wars but there is more to being a NeoCon than that.
He's a typical progressive.
That's why i don't see much difference between Socialists/Progressives & Neocons. Their policies always seem to to take you to the same place. That's how i see them anyway.
You really should have defined the context of "Neocon". I read thru wiki and got about 20 different things that they do, but nothing precise. If you mean a guy with conservative foreign policies and liberal domestic policies, then yes. If you mean Libertarian-lite, then no.
The problem BO has is that as the Debt grows, he simply is being painted into a corner as far as things he can actually do. A BO with no money is a lot different than a BO with no spending limits. Maybe the OP needs to consider what he "Can actually do" as opposed to what he "would like to do".
I'm just speaking to his policies overall. I just don't see change. In fact the more i look,the more similarities i see between him,Bush,and McCain. He has governed as a Big Government Neocon in my opinion.
You really should have defined the context of "Neocon". I read thru wiki and got about 20 different things that they do, but nothing precise. If you mean a guy with conservative foreign policies and liberal domestic policies, then yes. If you mean Libertarian-lite, then no.
The problem BO has is that as the Debt grows, he simply is being painted into a corner as far as things he can actually do. A BO with no money is a lot different than a BO with no spending limits. Maybe the OP needs to consider what he "Can actually do" as opposed to what he "would like to do".
I'm just speaking to his policies overall. I just don't see change. In fact the more i look,the more similarities i see between him,Bush,and McCain. He has governed as a Big Government Neocon in my opinion.
This may be part of the responsibilities of the Oval Office. He has the best information to make decisions with and he makes them accordingly, to his credit. IMHO if the ideologues had ALL of the info BO has, they might see things differently, similarly for the GOP candidates when they get in.
BO kept us relatively safe, his biggest mistakes were early on, he sucks-up to Wall Street for his $billion. He's a typical pol.
I'm just speaking to his policies overall. I just don't see change. In fact the more i look,the more similarities i see between him,Bush,and McCain. He has governed as a Big Government Neocon in my opinion.
This may be part of the responsibilities of the Oval Office. He has the best information to make decisions with and he makes them accordingly, to his credit. IMHO if the ideologues had ALL of the info BO has, they might see things differently, similarly for the GOP candidates when they get in.
BO kept us relatively safe, his biggest mistakes were early on, he sucks-up to Wall Street for his $billion. He's a typical pol.
If that's how you feel,that's cool with me. I just thought there would be change. His tenure has only been a continuation of the previous Administration's policies. I didn't think we would get an even bigger Big Government and more Wars. Just how i see it anyway.
If that's how you feel,that's cool with me. I just thought there would be change. His tenure has only been a continuation of the previous Administration's policies. I didn't think we would get an even bigger Big Government and more Wars. Just how i see it anyway.