Is Anthropogenic (Human-Caused) Global Warming/AGW Falsifiable?

[jc456]

Google it Dufus and accept any of the 30 k accredited science sources…

Google what? You believe fossil fuel comes from fossils! Hahaha maybe you should use google

 

[Dagosa]

Google what? You believe fossil fuel comes from fossils! Hahaha maybe you should use google

And you don’t ? You don’t believe cows milk comes from cows either.

 

[jc456]

And you don’t ? You don’t don’t believe cows milk comes from cows either.

Nope! Use google

 

[Dagosa]

Nope! Use google

Well there you go. We now know that fossil fuel comes from decaying plant life and plankton. Excellent.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Asked and answered a$$hole.
""Because no one is claiming that it can't get cooler IF Weakening of Solar Forcing (earth tilt changed, or distance increased cyclically) (or a La Nina, etc) overrode it due to any event - foreseen or unforeseen - just that Man IS causing it to warm with these Aptly name Greenhouse gases. And if a weakening of the sun cooled it, it would still be warmer than it would otherwise have been due to our thicker GHG blanket."

That now said (again) I choose Not to reply to any more of your TROLLING One line Question marks/Baits, (and trashy "sandy vag"/"sandy" name calling of several other posters)
You need to be Removed along with other harassing NON Factual, NON contributing, Trolls like jc-456 and Wetwall.
Goodbye/Fini. (was good for a bump up anyway)
`

You’re funny!

 

[jc456]

Well there you go. We now know that fossil fuel comes from decaying plant life and plankton. Excellent.

Abiogenic petroleum origin - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[Dagosa]

Abiogenic petroleum origin - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

No shit…that’s suppose to prove anything ?
Your reference says
“The abiogenic petroleum origin hypothesis….”
It’s a hypothesis. Now look up hypothesis and apologize for wasting our time.

 

[jc456]

Bubba..
Your reference says
“The abiogenic petroleum origin hypothesis….”
It’s a hypothesis. Now look up hypothesis and apologize for wasting our time.

Fossil fuel without the fossils - Nature

Petroleum: animal, vegetable or mineral?

www.nature.com

 

[Dagosa]

Fossil fuel without the fossils - Nature

Petroleum: animal, vegetable or mineral?

www.nature.com

It’s still a hypothesis…” they argue….” You’re still wasting our time.

 

[Dagosa]

Fossil fuel without the fossils - Nature

Petroleum: animal, vegetable or mineral?

www.nature.com

Fossil fuel without the fossils - Nature

Petroleum: animal, vegetable or mineral?

www.nature.com

Are you now using www.nature as a reliable reference now ? Good, they agree with me in fossil fossil fuels AND GLOBAL WARMING. Which is it fraud ?

Global warming will happen faster than we think

Three trends will combine to hasten it, warn Yangyang Xu, Veerabhadran Ramanathan and David G. Victor.

www.nature.com

 

[jc456]

It’s still a hypothesis…” they argue….” You’re still wasting our time.

Ignore it all you want. Facts are facts

 

[Dagosa]

Ignore it all you want. Facts are facts

They argue…..plus www.nature Your source, supports GLOBAL WARMING. FACTS ARE FACTS.

 

[jc456]

They argue…..plus www.nature Your source, supports GLOBAL WARMING. FACTS ARE FACTS.

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2008RG000270

 

[jc456]

They argue…..plus www.nature Your source, supports GLOBAL WARMING. FACTS ARE FACTS.

It’s tested. Where’s all your evidence again? Google it for us

 

[Dagosa]

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2008RG000270

You’re using AGU…they support climate change.
are you now supporting climate change too ? Which is it ?

Fact sheet on climate change | AGU

AGU and its network of Earth and space scientists are committed to studying climate change and its impacts, and to educating the public on their findings. Read the fact sheet.

www.agu.org

 

[jc456]

You’re using AGU…they support climate change.
are you now supporting climate change too ? Which is it ?

Fact sheet on climate change | AGU

AGU and its network of Earth and space scientists are committed to studying climate change and its impacts, and to educating the public on their findings. Read the fact sheet.

www.agu.org

I support climate change, not human causes

 

[Dagosa]

I support climate change, not human causes

That’s not what BOTH the sources you used say. They support AGW climate change.,.just what you argu wrongly about and fraudulently try to use them as references….fraud.

 

[jc456]

That’s not what BOTH the sources you used say. They support AGW climate change.,.just what you argu wrongly about and fraudulently try to use them as references….fraud.

And how does that diversion change what I posted?

 

[Dagosa]

And how does that diversion change what I posted?

Everything….you’re using evidence from a source you claim you don’t believe. That’s why you deniers are such frauds.

 

[ding]

We see in SunsetTommy's Signature two ideas/'truths' meant to show it isn't falsifiable and is therefore Not a Valid theory/truism.

“A theory that is not refutable by any conceivable event is non-scientific.” – Karl Popper​

​

"The climate system is a coupled non linear chaotic system, and therefore the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible" --- IPCC​

But Of course, it is Falsifiable, and the two statements above do Not necessitate any conclusion.
Saying so is a non sequitur.

If ie, we hugely cut our emissions as a planet, and GHGs returned to what they were before man drove them up: (ie, CO2 50%/280-420; or Methane 3x,) and the warming didN'T gradually stop and even reverse, that would discredit the theory, BARRING other factors as the many Solar Cycles (Milankovich etc).

Because no one is claiming that it can't get cooler IF Weakening of Solar Forcing (earth tilt changed, or distance increased cyclically) (or a La Nina, etc) overrode it due to any event - foreseen or unforeseen - just that Man IS causing it to warm with these Aptly name Greenhouse gases. And if a weakening of the sun cooled it, it would still be warmer than it would otherwise have been due to our thicker GHG blanket.

In fact, the theory continues to be Validated (which is how science works). Theories, like Evo, Atomic, etc do not get Proven. (A 'God' could always pop up and say he is the cause of anything.)
Scientists have already tested this by directly measuring Solar energy hitting earth, and shown that is has NOT Changed in 50+ years... UNLIKE what has caused ALL the other warming/cooling cycles.

They have also measure solar energy being Reflected back out into space, and it is being Blocked/Trapped at the exact spectral wavelengths of - again - (the aptly named) Greenhouse Gases.

That/those two is one of the biggest reason we know.

`

Yes, AGW is falsifiable. There's no evidence that the atmosphere is responsible for climate changes. There is evidence that the ocean is responsible for climate changes.