Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PS: there are higher resolution versions of Elektra Records' logo available.
doomsday articles are always talking about a one meter rise by 2100, sometimes two meters or even six. here is the graphic representation of just half a meter. even that seems unlikely doesnt it? can you mentally plot the steepness of the lines for 1, 2 or 6 meter increases?
Ans old rocks is just....old!Crusader Frank is a poorly disguised synonym for willfull ignorance on all subjects.
doomsday articles are always talking about a one meter rise by 2100, sometimes two meters or even six. here is the graphic representation of just half a meter. even that seems unlikely doesnt it? can you mentally plot the steepness of the lines for 1, 2 or 6 meter increases?
for crick
dude, dudette whatever you are, you will never understand your opposition. Give it up already, we laugh everyday at your posts. See to me the definition of acceleration is zero to 60 in four seconds. Now that's fnnn acceleration!!! Too bad you have never proven your use of the word.Thread summary: Deniers say all the data is a socialist conspiracy. And fail hard at understanding something as simple as acceleration.
This thread is a good example of why the whole planet considers deniers to be loopy conspiracy cultists.
jc, you're whining too loud for anyone to understand a word you say. Dogs are howling in pain from your high-frequency hysterics. And reposting a debunked fudged graph just makes you look like a pathological liar.
I think calling him stoopid is a compliment!!!jc, you're whining too loud for anyone to understand a word you say. Dogs are howling in pain from your high-frequency hysterics. And reposting a debunked fudged graph just makes you look like a pathological liar.
Idiot....satellite altimetry is accurate to +/- 13mm....your priests are reporting sea level based on satellite altimetry to the nearest 1/100th of a mm....Here is a two part question...what is the margin of error and how stupid do you have to be to believe the reports?
I think you're referencing the wrong person there fido!!!! I've not posted a graph, so unless you can point to the one you're referencing, you're just again exposing that you are truly moronic.jc, you're whining too loud for anyone to understand a word you say. Dogs are howling in pain from your high-frequency hysterics. And reposting a debunked fudged graph just makes you look like a pathological liar.
Nice job of endpoint selection and scaling, Ian.
Here's the original. Doesn't look so crazy, does it. And this goes to a full meter.
You've already tried that lie before and it doesn't work any better here. Ian's plots show 1900 to 2100. Mine - the IPCC's actual chart - shows 1700. to 2100. Ian's plot's scaling and his elimination of the almost constant sea level in the more distant past made the prediction look steeper. So where the fuck do you get that my charts are "showing smaller and smaller bits of time"?
You are such a stupid ass.
Now whose the one showing smaller and smaller bits of time? Besides which, your plot is dated. Here's the latest and a link you can use when you actually want to see the latest.
2014 rel4 Global Mean Sea Level Time Series seasonal signals removed CU Sea Level Research Group
Now whose the one showing smaller and smaller bits of time? Besides which, your plot is dated. Here's the latest and a link you can use when you actually want to see the latest.
2014 rel4 Global Mean Sea Level Time Series seasonal signals removed CU Sea Level Research Group
Yours...it doesn't show any time...it only shows computer model projections...mine is of actual measurement and goes to the present...models aren't real and therefore don't really show anything real. That's part of your problem..you are unable to separate reality from model output...
