Inquisition in Europe: what they hide.

Austro-Hungarians have always looked like men, from ancient times to the 20th century

Lajos_Osko_Miniatur_Franz_Joseph_I_in_ungarischer_Uniform.jpg

i
 
The few words which exist from the language of the Awars are some names of people and places. It's absolutelly impossible to reconstruct the language of the Awars out of this very few data.
Of course, but the fact that the expansion of the Avars coincides with the spread of Slavic languages among the Balts and Balkans is just a strange coincidence
 
the Vikings are probably the purest lie.

Good grief. Buy a new brain. The Normans ("French") had for example conquered England in 1066 ("William the conqueror"). The ancestors of this Normans (Vikings) had been seddled down there from the Frankonians to protect France from this plague.

The boatmen were known to be a hucksters and slave traders.

The word "slave" comes really from the word "Slav". Vikings hunted Slavs and sold them as slaves.

Maybe they had axes and sometimes fought, but no one knows anything about their military affairs.

Not? They were everywhere - in all seas and in all rivers - they transported even their whole ships over land bridges. Sometimes they made only trades - but ofren they fought unbelievable brutal and cruel.

These are the things the street punks in Kings do, no one says they are "warriors."

Explain this to a Viking if you meet one. Perhaps he agrees - perhaps not. Your problem. 1000 years ago they visited by the way Canada.

The descendants of the Vikings in the northern countries look like powdered columbines, they wore garters and lace, openwork underwear. And obeyed women

A good description of the original Vikings when they did not do their job to be a Viking - and also a good description of the Crusaders in the Frankonian wars.
 
Last edited:
slawic language started in the 6th century in Belarus not far from Kiew
You're lying. There was a Baltic at that time. It is well known in science that Slavic ulcers spread from the Danube, this is not discussed.
 
The territory of Belarus was also part of the Avar Kaganate, which is why the Baltic langs were pushed out to Lithuania and Prussia by the Slavsic langs, just along the border of Avar influence in the Baltic.
 
Of course, but the fact that the expansion of the Avars coincides with the spread of Slavic languages among the Balts and Balkans is just a strange coincidence
No - this means only that the Slavs murdered the Awars and overtook their territory.
 
Later from it divide Avar State, it covered in particular the lands of Belarus. Before it they speaks balt langs

img6.jpg
 
the Slavs
There has never been such an ethnic group, these are peoples who were Huns, or who adopted their language, including the Illyrians, Norics, Veneti in the Balkans, and the southern Balts (Belarusians and historical Russians)
Now they are also considered only a linguistic group, and they also include the continental Sami.
 
The ethnonym "Slavs" most likely appeared after the enslavement by the Franks.
 
no link = bullshit
I am not at all interested in references to modern false propaganda, which pretends to be "science", I operate only with facts. Let the brainwashed idiots read their "links"
 
The territory of Belarus was also part of the Avar Kaganate, which is why the Baltic langs were pushed out to Lithuania and Prussia by the Slavsic langs, just along the border of Avar influence in the Baltic.

The Prussians (whatever their foregathers spoke) spoke German. Estonian and "Livisch" (German expression) are similiar to the Hungarian language. And it exist in Scandinavia and Balticum much more languages which have not a lot to do with the Slaws.
 
The Prussians (whatever their foregathers spoke) spoke German. Estonian and "Livisch" (German expression) are similiar to the Hungarian language. And it exist in Scandinavia and Balticum much more languages which have not a lot to do with the Slaws.
You lie again. Prussian language belongs to the Baltic group
 

Forum List

Back
Top