In your opinion, does a woman who is being raped have the right to use deadly force on her rapist?

[Anonymous1977]

...how about, if a man is being forcibly sodomized, does he have the right to use deadly force on his attacker?

I think yes in both cases.

 

[gtopa1]

Most bloody definitely!! As does anyone who goes to her assistance if it is required to stop it!!

Greg

 

[PratchettFan]

Absolutely.

 

[Papageorgio]

You betcha!

 

[Brain357]

Obviously.

 

[Desperado]

Why do you even have to ask?
Without a doubt use of deadly force is permissible and encouraged.

 

[Stephanie]

why is this question even being asked?

If it was me and I didn't kill him on the spot, I'd hunt him down and kill him no matter how long it took.

 

[Roadrunner]

...how about, if a man is being forcibly sodomized, does he have the right to use deadly force on his attacker?

I think yes in both cases.

Not only yes, in both cases, but, if on a jury, I would never vote to convict a man or woman who hunted down their rapist and killed them.

 

[Nutz]

...how about, if a man is being forcibly sodomized, does he have the right to use deadly force on his attacker?

I think yes in both cases.

Not only yes, in both cases, but, if on a jury, I would never vote to convict a man or woman who hunted down their rapist and killed them.

Nor would I convict a brother, father, husband or other family member who hunted down the scum.

 

[Indofred]

I see rape as an extremely serious attack, regardless of who attacks whom.
That in mind, if killing the attacker is the only guaranteed way of escaping, I have no problem with deadly force.

I was once seriously sexually assaulted by a man in a bar's toilet - I kicked the ******* shit out of the bastard.
He grabbed my cock and went for a suck but got a knee under the chin, a serious tenderising of his face and a kick in the goolies he will never forget.
I was told I'm homophobic, but that's untrue, I'm rapistbastardaphobic.

As for punishment for rapists - I'm really right wing on this issue - public flogging in the town square on a Saturday morning. They can join the wife beaters.

 

[Little-Acorn]

Of course.

Does she know for sure the rapist is NOT going to use deadly force on her???

 

[Roadrunner]

I see rape as an extremely serious attack, regardless of who attacks whom.
That in mind, if killing the attacker is the only guaranteed way of escaping, I have no problem with deadly force.

I was once seriously sexually assaulted by a man in a bar's toilet - I kicked the ******* shit out of the bastard.
He grabbed my cock and went for a suck but got a knee under the chin, a serious tenderising of his face and a kick in the goolies he will never forget.
I was told I'm homophobic, but that's untrue, I'm rapistbastardaphobic.

As for punishment for rapists - I'm really right wing on this issue - public flogging in the town square on a Saturday morning. They can join the wife beaters.

Forcible rape should be a capital offense.

You can flog them on the square for a few days too, wouldn't hurt my feelings.

 

[westwall]

...how about, if a man is being forcibly sodomized, does he have the right to use deadly force on his attacker?

I think yes in both cases.

Yup. Blow his ass away.

 

[Iceweasel]

In this country he or she does. Easier to do to if they are prepared.

 

[TheOldSchool]

...how about, if a man is being forcibly sodomized, does he have the right to use deadly force on his attacker?

I think yes in both cases.

According to republicans it's probably not rape. Care to change your answer?

 

[bripat9643]

...how about, if a man is being forcibly sodomized, does he have the right to use deadly force on his attacker?

I think yes in both cases.

IF you are being assaulted by anyone, you have the right to blow them away, as far as I'm concerned.

 

[SwimExpert]

This is too vague a question.

 

[The Rabbi]

This is too vague a question.

Which part is vague? Seems pretty clear cut and I'd say not permitted byt mandatory.

 

[AmericanFirst]

...how about, if a man is being forcibly sodomized, does he have the right to use deadly force on his attacker?

I think yes in both cases.

Yes

 

[SwimExpert]

This is too vague a question.

Which part is vague? Seems pretty clear cut and I'd say not permitted byt mandatory.

Rape can mean:

-Being jumped in a dark alley and brutally assaulted and having sex taken by violent force, perhaps involving a weapon
-Being at a frat party and being at least .00001% more drunk than the guy you decided to have sex with
-Being 17 and having sex with an 18 year old boyfriend/girlfriend
-Being asleep and having an s/o think some kinky dreams might be fun

...among other things.