In the interest of National Healing, Democrats Pledge to Stop Calling Trump and MAGA Conservatives Fascists and Racists

[citygator]

NOTE TO OP:

 

[White 6]

I can’t help but take note of the fact that White doesn’t support his own claim.

Share a link with us all, White. Support your claim that the U.S. Army deployed any troops to DC at the direction of President Trump. In fact, support your empty claim that an active members of the Army were deployed to DC at all.

White 6

When the National Guard is under federal activation, they are considered part of the U.S. Army or U.S. Air Force, depending on their branch. This means they operate as federal soldiers or airmen during that time.

Wikipedia HowStuffWorks

 

[BackAgain]

When the National Guard is under federal activation, they are considered part of the U.S. Army or U.S. Air Force, depending on their branch. This means they operate as federal soldiers or airmen during that time.

Wikipedia HowStuffWorks

First off, of course, that’s a humorous change from what you originally claimed.

Secondly, it comical that you cite a Wiki piece as authority for your now altered claim.

That a national guard troop is activated federally doesn’t convert the troop from National Guard to Army. It merely brings the national guard under the command of the Army. Again, that’s not what you initially claimed.

By the way, perhaps you should recognize that when President Trump “federalized” some National Guard troops for DC, he didn’t do so under Title 10. He did so under Title 32.

Do you know why? Do you grasp how that nullifies your claims?

 

[White 6]

First off, of course, that’s a humorous change from what you originally claimed.

Secondly, it comical that you cite a Wiki piece as authority for your now altered claim.

That a national guard troop is activated federally doesn’t convert the troop from National Guard to Army. It merely brings the national guard under the command of the Army. Again, that’s not what you initially claimed.

By the way, perhaps you should recognize that when President Trump “federalized” some National Guard troops for DC, he didn’t do so under Title 10. He did so under Title 32.

Do you know why? Do you grasp how that nullifies your claims?

Exactly what I claimed. On active duty, they are active army.
There is no valid reference that says otherwise.

 

[BackAgain]

Exactly what I claimed. On active duty, they are active army.
There is no valid reference that says otherwise

Wrong. They aren’t active Army even if title 10 is used.

They are by definition not so at all under any circumstances under Title 32.

Don’t you even get that Title 32 (under DC home rule) doesn’t federalize the national guard.

The differences between Title 10 and Title 32 are perfectly valid references.

So, you remain entirely wrong.

And “what you claimed” (although changed by you over a few posts) remains fully wrong, all the same.

 

[White 6]

Wrong. They aren’t active Army even if title 10 is used.

They are by definition not so at all under any circumstances under Title 32.

Don’t you even get that Title 32 (under DC home rule) doesn’t federalize the national guard.

The differences between Title 10 and Title 32 are perfectly valid references.

So, you remain entirely wrong.

And “what you claimed” (although changed by you over a few posts) remains fully wrong, all the same.

False. Title 10 Federal activation is Active Army.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Exactly what I claimed. On active duty, they are active army.
There is no valid reference that says otherwise.

I suspect you have never been Guard or Army and unfamiliar with Federal call-ups.

 

[BackAgain]

False. Title 10 Federal activation is Active Army.

No. But irrelevant.

Trump used Title 32; not Article 10.

As I said.

The activated National Guard in DC were activated under Article 32. Not under Article 10. Repeated again just for you.

Try to keep up.

 

[CowboyTed]

Just kidding. But it would be nice. It would also show that their calls for "unity" weren't just designed to get the heat off them.

WATCH: Kirk killing is a moment for Americans to unite in mourning, Schumer says

At the U.S. Capitol on Thursday, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said “all Americans should come together and feel and mourn what happened.”

www.pbs.org

Sorry I am not showing 'unity' with a guy who ******* underaged minors...

The Piece of Shit was best friends with Epstein for a Decade... It is very clear that Epstein was enabling everyone around him...
Piece of Shit has a conviction about lying about sexually assaulting a woman, he has 20+ women accusing him of sexual assault or rape despite his money and influence...

Piece of Shit is a rapist...

What is MAGA answer? Subpoena Clinton... Clinton is a choir boy compared to Piece of Shit

 

[M14 Shooter]

Sorry I am not showing 'unity' with a guy who ******* underaged minors...

Oh look.
Another leftard liar.

 

[Nostra]

False. Title 10 Federal activation is Active Army.

So WTF point are you trying to make?


Why the pretzel twisting over semantic bullshit? Cuz that's all losers like you have.

 

[krichton]

There is no unity with people who support fascism and pedophiles.

 

[M14 Shooter]

There is no unity with people who support fascism and pedophiles.

Correct. Democrats aren't the opposition, they are the enemy.

 

[White 6]

No. But irrelevant.

Trump used Title 32; not Article 10.

As I said.

The activated National Guard in DC were activated under Article 32. Not under Article 10. Repeated again just for you.

Try to keep up.

So WTF point are you trying to make?


Why the pretzel twisting over semantic bullshit? Cuz that's all losers like you have.

Somebody objected to characterizing Trump military deployments to support immigration crackdown as federal troops.

 

[Nostra]

Somebody objected to characterizing Trump military deployments to support immigration crackdown as federal troops.

Wow! That really triggered you, huh? Someone objected...............and you went on a two page pissy pants rant about it.

How sad.

 

[White 6]

Wow! That really triggered you, huh? Someone objected...............and you went on a two page pissy pants rant about it.

How sad.

No rant, just setting the record straight, as American do not want Federal Troops in the streets, on duty, across America. It looks like the Supreme Court does not, either.

 

[M14 Shooter]

It looks like the Supreme Court does not, either.

Yeah?
What did the Supreme Court say?
Cite / copy / paste.

 

[Nostra]

No rant, just setting the record straight, as American do not want Federal Troops in the streets, on duty, across America. It looks like the Supreme Court does not, either.

So you were butthurt when Obama used Federal Troops in the streets?

 

[BackAgain]

Somebody objected to characterizing Trump military deployments to support immigration crackdown as federal troops.

False. White is literally falling apart.

Trump did federalize some national guard troops. Nobody objected to that statement of fact.

Your claim, however, was that this made them “Army.” No. It doesn’t.

And, the larger point was (and still is despite your deflection efforts): when President Trump federalized some national guard troops for DC, he did not use Article 10. He used Article 32.

And here you are, pretending that you don’t understand that important distincrion

Bottom line: you’ve been consistently wrong in your assertions on this matter and you refuse to even admit it — despite proof.

 

[BackAgain]

No rant, just setting the record straight, as American do not want Federal Troops in the streets, on duty, across America. It looks like the Supreme Court does not, either.

They still aren’t federal troops.