In Historic 6-3 Supreme Court Decision, 3 Justices Ruled To Be Morons

[WelfareQueen]

Marbury, and the judicial review that came with it, isn't going anywhere.

It is unconstitutional.

 

[Dragonlady]

Not an answer to my question, so I'll try again:

What can the president do when a federal court issues a blatantly unconstitutional order, with a short deadline that does not allow time for an appeal before the action required by the order?

For example, suppose a Democrat congressperson had been briefed on the raid on Iran's nuclear weapons program before the mission. By the time that Democrat can get the highly classified information to an anti-Israel activist group and that group files a suit in a lower federal court, the mission aircraft have already taken off.

The lower court judge orders the lawyers for the president to ensure that the planes are turned around immediately.

If the president believes this order is unconstitutional, what can the president do (legally, according to you)?

They can do what Trump did, but in the case of birthright citizenship, Trump is WRONG and the SC is likely to overturn the EO.

It should be pointed out that when Biden tried to get the SC course to set aside a national injunction, the SC refused to hear the case. Just saying.

 

[Meister]

View attachment 1129589

So Donald Trump as their father isn't a part of the equation?

Seriously? Have you given this much thought?

 

[PeanutGallery]

You mean the 50/50 Congress which puts the lie to the notion that the President has a "mandate" to push through his agenda????

A President doesn't get their "mandate" from the makeup of Congress. Winning the electoral college by 86 would be any president's notion that they have a mandate to govern.

Trump was just on TV that he won in a "landslide" because he won all 7 Swing States. He won the election by a 1.5% margin. MORE VOTERS STAYED HOME THAN VOTED FOR TRUMP.

Since it's an election, it's based on who goes out and vote. So what, that more people stayed home. They didn't vote, so their opinion had zero effect on Trump winning. The fact that Trump won the electoral AND the popular vote, regardless of the margin, is a mandate. Who here had Trump winning the popular vote in 2024? Also, I understand that Trump is going to exaggerate one way or the other. Knowing this, I'm not going to take everything he says as the gospel truth. Democrats/liberals, for some reason, want to take all those exaggerations seriously. I think he does it now just to get under y'all skin.

Trump won a weak squeaker of an election, with 25% of registered voters casting ballots for him, in a slim margin over Harris, and Trump has has declared himself King.

It would be laughably funny if it wasn't so dangerous and unhinged.

I think you may be confused with your own country where you have to deal with the Crown. If Trump's a king, can you send me something of when the coronation took place. I'm busy, but I don't think I would miss an event like that.

 

[HikerGuy83]

This one, where it's fashionable for billionaires to own a supreme court justice or two.

Does your mother still tuck you in and night and tell you these fairy tales ?

 

[M14 Shooter]

But this SC seems particularly determined to empower the Presidency and end citizens rights.

All you do is lie.

 

[Seymour Flops]

They can do what Trump did,

So, you do not believe presidents are bound by unconstitutional lower court decisions?

Good, then we agree fully on that.

Hopefully, berg80 can be as straightforward, however he wishes to answer.

but in the case of birthright citizenship, Trump is WRONG and the SC is likely to overturn the EO.

Probably.

If such an EO had been issued and such a case had been brought shortly after the Reconstruction Amendments were ratified, the courts would likely not have upheld birthright citizenship. But it has become engrained in our thinking, so the court will be reluctant to change it.

I'm not too mad about that. Illegal immigration has slowed to a trickle, and without the so-called "bipartisan border bill." The line of who is a natural citizen and who is not must be drawn somewhere and where one is born seems the most logical.

It should be pointed out that when Biden tried to get the SC course to set aside a national injunction, the SC refused to hear the case. Just saying.

Maybe they were aware that Biden was not running things by that time.

Or maybe they exercised their (self-given) power to wait until there is a case ripe for an outcome that they prefer.

What was the Biden case, if you know it?

 

[WelfareQueen]

So Donald Trump as their father isn't a part of the equation?

Seriously? Have you given this much thought?

They're a Dim, so I am guessing no.

 

[marvin martian]

Look at you, continuing to demonstrate you have zero idea what this ruling does.
Well done.

Remember, skews13 is the retard who thinks Trump's kids are illegals because their mother was an immigrant.

 

[Oddball]

 

[toobfreak]

View attachment 1129673

If there were really justice, these justices who either clearly knew they were way outside the law but did not care using their position purely for political purposes, or incompetently had no idea what their limits were should at the least be fined a fee equal to a third their annual salary, to being disbarred from practicing law.

 

[Oddball]

Trump won a weak squeaker of an election, with 25% of registered voters casting ballots for him, in a slim margin over Harris, and Trump has has declared himself King.

It would be laughably funny if it wasn't so dangerous and unhinged.

 

[Oddball]

If there were really justice, these justices who either clearly knew they were way outside the law but did not care using their position purely for political purposes, or incompetently had no idea what their limits were should at the least be fined a fee equal to a third their annual salary, to being disbarred from practicing law.

Jurisdiction is something you learn in Law 101....They knew they didn't have it...Should be disbarred.

 

[Dragonlady]

A President doesn't get their "mandate" from the makeup of Congress. Winning the electoral college by 86 would be any president's notion that they have a mandate to govern.

Since it's an election, it's based on who goes out and vote. So what, that more people stayed home. They didn't vote, so their opinion had zero effect on Trump winning. The fact that Trump won the electoral AND the popular vote, regardless of the margin, is a mandate. Who here had Trump winning the popular vote in 2024? Also, I understand that Trump is going to exaggerate one way or the other. Knowing this, I'm not going to take everything he says as the gospel truth. Democrats/liberals, for some reason, want to take all those exaggerations seriously. I think he does it now just to get under y'all skin.

I think you may be confused with your own country where you have to deal with the Crown. If Trump's a king, can you send me something of when the coronation took place. I'm busy, but I don't think I would miss an event like that.

Trump declared himself to be king.

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114032082899254855

The Story Behind TIME’s Trump 'King Me' Cover

Brooklyn-based artist Tim O’Brien painted Donald Trump for TIME's latest cover

time.com

 

[IM2]

That rule can easily be reversed if Democrats ever regain power.
Someone HAS to stop these arrogant irresponsible leftist children in their tracks in their quest to destroy America and themselves along with it.

More projection.

 

[dudmuck]

Jurisdiction is something you learn in Law 101....They knew they didn't have it...Should be disbarred.

 

[Oddball]

SUCK IT!!

 

[toobfreak]

Trump declared himself to be king.

Must really be bad up there is decrepit Canada!

 

[Dragonlady]

Jurisdiction is something you learn in Law 101....They knew they didn't have it...Should be disbarred.

The SC has, in effect, stripped all lower court judges of their power and accrued all judicial power until themselves, as they are now the only court which can issue a national injunction. This further erodes the checks and balances on Executive Power.

The SC is remaking to Constitution to destroy citizens' rights and accrue all power to the President and the SC. The Legislative Branch is, in essence, stalemated by being split down the middle.

 

[Oddball]

The SC has, in effect, stripped all lower court judges of their power and accrued all judicial power until themselves, as they are now the only court which can issue a national injunction. This further erodes the checks and balances on Executive Power.

The SC is remaking to Constitution to destroy citizens' rights and accrue all power to the President and the SC. The Legislative Branch is, in essence, stalemated by being split down the middle.

No, USSC told them to get the **** back into their own lane....


And if you don't like it.....