In Historic 6-3 Supreme Court Decision, 3 Justices Ruled To Be Morons

[toobfreak]

Leftists are such lousy losers.

Let's see: 6:3 decision. Just when do the MAJORITY become the majority in the Left's eyes and not just "a cult?"

Ever?

 

[IM2]

Winning the electoral college by 86 votes is not a national mandate.

Obama won the EC by 192 votes over McCain, but you guys didn't call that a mandate.

Obama won the EC by 126 votes over Romney, but you guys didn't call that a mandate.

This court is going down in history with the court of Taney and the court that made Jim Crow legal. Those are two of the worst decisions made in our history before this court decided Dobbs. And now we see their 3rd straight idiot decision.

 

[BluesLegend]

Thank you for admitting I'm right and you have nothing.

I have Trump who just CANCELED all trade talks with Canada.

 

[WEATHER53]

View attachment 1129673

Judges bought and paid from Littletown USA are not going to be able to pretend they can issue edicts covering the Entire Country anymore.

 

[Dragonlady]

Must really be bad up there is decrepit Canada!

Actually it's really great up here. Unlike the USA, our infrastructure isn't crumbling, our bridges aren't collapsing. Unlike the USA, Canada hasn't elected convicted felons, or the worst businessman in world history to run our country.

When you can succintly sum up your nation's economic problems in one short paragraph, you're doing well.

"Canada's macroeconomic framework is robust, supported by strong public finances and a well-capitalised banking sector. However, the economy faces significant headwinds from tariffs with the United States. High household mortgage debt remains another vulnerability, and high debt service costs weigh on household finances. There is also room to improve the efficiency of the tax structure."

https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/sub-issues/economic-surveys/canada-economic-snapshot.html

 

[WEATHER53]

All in favor of freedom
The rest in favor of freakdumb

 

[JGalt]

In a 6-3 ruling, the SCOTUS has granted a partial stay against lower courts that issue nationwide injunctions. Amy Coney Barrett wrote for the Majority. This is a huge victory for the Trump administration, freeing it to essentially enact its agenda as it sees fit within the bounds of constitutional law. It mostly stops lower courts from issuing blanket injunctions.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a884_8n59.pdf

Wow! The left really got their collective dicks knocked in the dirt today. Not only did the SC limit nationwide injunctions against birthright citizenship, parents can also opt their kids out of classes with transgender book characters, they sided with Texas' age verification law for porn sites, postponed a racial gerrymandering case, and upheld South Carolina's ban on Medicaid funds for Planned Parenthood.

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/27/g-s1-74738/scotus-decisions-birthright-aca

Let the salty tears flow.

 

[Doc7505]

In a 6-3 ruling, the SCOTUS has granted a partial stay against lower courts that issue nationwide injunctions. Amy Coney Barrett wrote for the Majority. This is a huge victory for the Trump administration, freeing it to essentially enact its agenda as it sees fit within the bounds of constitutional law. It mostly stops lower courts from issuing blanket injunctions.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/24a884_8n59.pdf

~~~~~~

Supreme Court Ends Abuse of Injunctions: ​

No More ‘Judicial Supremacy’​

Supreme Court Ends Abuse of Injunctions: No More 'Judicial Supremacy'

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in the "birthright citizenship" case that lower courts cannot simply issue nationwide injunctions.

www.breitbart.com

27 Jun 2025 ~~ By Joel B. Pollak


The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 on Friday in the controversial “birthright citizenship” case that lower courts cannot simply issue nationwide injunctions, and that doing so is an abuse of their judicial power.
The decision in Trump v. Casa vindicated the Department of Justice (DOJ) strategy of arguing against the idea of nationwide injunctions, rather than addressing the underlying substantive issue in the case — namely, the dispute over whether the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution guarantees citizenship upon birth. Conservatives argue that “birthright citizenship” is abused by illegal migrants to make their children into U.S. citizens, who can later sponsor the legal immigration of the rest of their families. They also argue that no other nation has birthright citizenship, and that the Fourteenth Amendment did not intend to create it.
~Snip~
In a originalist opinion written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the court’s conservative majority found: “Universal injunctions likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has given to federal courts.”
Barrett wrote:

The Judiciary Act of 1789 endowed federal courts with jurisdiction over “all suits . . . in equity,” §11, 1 Stat. 78, and still today, this statute “is what authorizes the federal courts to issue equitable remedies,” S. Bray & E. Sherwin, Remedies 442 (4th ed. 2024). Though flexible, this equitable authority is not freewheeling. We have held that the statutory grant encompasses only those sorts of equitable remedies “traditionally accorded by courts of equity” at our country’s inception. … We must therefore ask whether universal injunctions are sufficiently “analogous” to the relief issued “‘by the High Court of Chancery in England at the time of the adoption of the Constitution and the enactment of the original Judiciary Act.’” Grupo Mexicano, 527 U. S., at 318–319 (quoting A. Dobie, Handbook of Federal Jurisdiction and Procedure 660 (1928)).​

The answer is no: Neither the universal injunction nor any analogous form of relief was available in the High Court of Chancery in England at the time of the founding. Equity offered a mechanism for the Crown “to secure justice where it would not be secured by the ordinary and existing processes of law.”​

........​

Nor did founding-era courts of equity in the United States chart a different course.​

........​

The bottom line? The universal injunction was conspicuously nonexistent for most of our Nation’s history. Its absence from 18th- and 19th-century equity practice settles the question of judicial authority.​

~Snip~
Barrett dismissed Jackson’s dissent sternly: “We will not dwell on JUSTICE JACKSON’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself. We observe only this: JUSTICE JACKSON decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary.”
Going forward, district courts will only be able to apply their judgments beyond the areas of their jurisdiction if the plaintiffs can file their complaints in the form of a class action, demonstrating common injuries.
Left-wing groups who relied on “forum-shopping” to find friendly judges in remote places who could stop national policies — part of an overall strategy of “Lawfare” — have now lost a key weapon in their arsenal.

Commentary:
So much for Justice Barrett drifting left or being weak. She took Jackson to the woodshed with some of the harshest language I can recall one justice using on another.
This ruling in effect nullifies the Democrat judge shopping, district court's illegal ruling, and will overload the lower courts trying to litigate each case individually.
Overloading the lower courts with completely political law suits will soon prove to be the DSA Democrat Leftist's undoing legally. Class actions can still be brought, but they do not have the power of an injunction.
Additionally, along with defunding all these NGO's that the DSA Democrat left lunatics use and abuse, may hopefully bankrupt the lunatic left attorneys as well. Next on the list is Soros and his corrupt, criminal enterprise who illegally sucked millions out of USAID.

 

[toobfreak]

Actually it's really great up here.

Must be why everyone from Canada comes here to live, etc.

Unlike the USA, our infrastructure isn't crumbling, our bridges aren't collapsing.

In other words, you spent your money on yourselves while we gave you and other countries trillions of our money.
Yet Canada is still a fascist shithole where you can get arrested just for thinking wrong.

Unlike the USA, Canada hasn't elected convicted felons, or the worst businessman in world history to run our country.

How sad then that Trump is spanking your asses. Now, Trump has just cut off all affairs between our countries.

When you can succintly sum up your nation's economic problems in one short paragraph, you're doing well.

One paragraph, why not just two words? Canada: YOU SUCK.

Canada's macroeconomic framework is robust,

Yeah, they really have you rubes buffaloed.

 

[Seymour Flops]

The SC has, in effect, stripped all lower court judges of their power and accrued all judicial power until themselves, as they are now the only court which can issue a national injunction. This further erodes the checks and balances on Executive Power.

The SC is remaking to Constitution to destroy citizens' rights and accrue all power to the President and the SC. The Legislative Branch is, in essence, stalemated by being split down the middle.

How?

The USSC has always been able to over-rule decisions by lower federal courts.

This ruling merely ensures that lower courts do not make rulings that they themselves know are likely to be ruled erroneous and quickly enforce them on a national level before that happens.

As far as I know, crazy rulings by the 9th Circuit, for example, will still be applicable within its jurisdiction.

 

[toobfreak]

Wow! The left really got their collective dicks knocked in the dirt today.

Not only did the SC limit nationwide injunctions against birthright citizenship, parents can also opt their kids out of classes with transgender book characters, they sided with Texas' age verification law for porn sites, postponed a racial gerrymandering case, and upheld South Carolina's ban on Medicaid funds for Planned Parenthood.

And to be sure, not only can't Boasberg issue anymore Trump injunctions, not only are the tariff barriers falling, wokism dying, transgender being suffocated, but Birthright Citizenship is falling. The Supremes will probably issue their final ruling on it in October.

Let the salty tears flow.

 

[struth]

Big win for the rule of law and the our republic

 

[whitehall]

Solid majority and good call. It must piss off the socialist democrats.

 

[WEATHER53]

Ding dong the ding dongs are going gone

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Live updates: Trump calls court ruling a ‘monumental victory'

The Supreme Court left the fate of birthright citizenship unclear by curbing nationwide injunctions. President Donald Trump called the decision a victory.

apnews.com

WOW - Barrett on Jackson -

"We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself," Barrett wrote. "We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary."

 

[Oddball]

 

[RetiredGySgt]

The SC has, in effect, stripped all lower court judges of their power and accrued all judicial power until themselves, as they are now the only court which can issue a national injunction. This further erodes the checks and balances on Executive Power.

The SC is remaking to Constitution to destroy citizens' rights and accrue all power to the President and the SC. The Legislative Branch is, in essence, stalemated by being split down the middle.

The supreme Court is THE ONLY COURT in the Constitution the other federal Courts don't have the same power rights or authority,

 

[BluesLegend]

Wait, didn't the black one swear to uphold and defend the Constitution??

 

[rightwinger]

We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary."

It is a good way to describe the Roberts Court
An Imperial Judiciary protecting an Imperial Executive

They have abandoned the Constitution to run interference for an out of control President

 

[Oddball]

Wait, didn't the black one swear to uphold and defend the Constitution??