In Historic 6-3 Supreme Court Decision, 3 Justices Ruled To Be Morons

It is a good way to describe the Roberts Court
An Imperial Judiciary protecting an Imperial Executive

They have abandoned the Constitution to run interference for an out of control President
Love.webp
 
How can the three radical LEFT justices come to the polar opposite decision of the other six justices, on the exact same 200 years of law precedent and Constitution??
 
Now Trump has 3.5 more years to F with Dems and they can't run to their shill Dem judges for protection, OH SHIT!
 
How can the three radical LEFT justices come to the polar opposite decision of the other six justices, on the exact same 200 years of law precedent and Constitution??

Good question. If even supreme court justices cannot agree on the meaning of the law, what does that say about our legal system?
 
It is a good way to describe the Roberts Court
An Imperial Judiciary protecting an Imperial Executive

They have abandoned the Constitution to run interference for an out of control President
They are, in fact, the only branch of government that is currently upholding the Constitution.
 
Actually it's really great up here. Unlike the USA, our infrastructure isn't crumbling, our bridges aren't collapsing. Unlike the USA, Canada hasn't elected convicted felons, or the worst businessman in world history to run our country.

When you can succintly sum up your nation's economic problems in one short paragraph, you're doing well.

"Canada's macroeconomic framework is robust, supported by strong public finances and a well-capitalised banking sector. However, the economy faces significant headwinds from tariffs with the United States. High household mortgage debt remains another vulnerability, and high debt service costs weigh on household finances. There is also room to improve the efficiency of the tax structure."

~~~~~~
Why is it then, that many Canadians come to the U.S. for surgery and cancer treatment in the U.S.? Then there are those that are trying to escape euthanization...
Here's a few ditties to Read more:
xxxxxxxxxx​
xxxxxxxxxx​

Meanwhile, Alberta Province leaders discussions are gaining momentum following the introduction of legislation that lowers the threshold for a citizen-led referendum on the issue. Premier Danielle Smith has indicated that a referendum could take place in 2026 if enough support is gathered from Albertans.
Kinda blows your statement out of the water.
If Albert secedes Saskatchewan will follow then British Columbia..
Interestingly, there is also the good possibility the the Eastern Provinces are seeking to leave the commonwealth.
Several eastern provinces in Canada, particularly Newfoundland and Labrador, have shown interest in secession due to historical grievances and perceived neglect by the federal government. Additionally, there have been discussions about a Maritime Union involving New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, and Nova Scotia, .
 
15th post
In a 6-3 ruling, the SCOTUS has granted a partial stay against lower courts that issue nationwide injunctions. Amy Coney Barrett wrote for the Majority. This is a huge victory for the Trump administration, freeing it to essentially enact its agenda as it sees fit within the bounds of constitutional law. It mostly stops lower courts from issuing blanket injunctions.

Looks like the GOP is shit out of luck when the president is a Democrat.
 
The SC has, in effect, stripped all lower court judges of their power and accrued all judicial power until themselves, as they are now the only court which can issue a national injunction. This further erodes the checks and balances on Executive Power.

The SC is remaking to Constitution to destroy citizens' rights and accrue all power to the President and the SC. The Legislative Branch is, in essence, stalemated by being split down the middle.
Drama queen much? SC told them to stick within your jurisdiction. It's not hard.
 
Back
Top Bottom