In Dallas, Nearly 8,000 out of 9,644 Illegals Arrested by ICE have Criminal Records

Seymour Flops said:
View attachment 1207282

This is what happens when law enforcement cooperates with law enforcement in inforcing the law.



Dallas is a Blue City, but it is a Texas Blue City, and Texas has laws against santuary policies. Laws actually being enforced by our Attorney General.

So ICE is able to make arrests at jails where communities do not have to be bothered, and the "activists" cannot commit violent acts against law enoforcement.
Click to expand...


Shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit......I live there. I coulda told you THAT!!!!
They need to expand to Plano, Garland, Mesquite, Red Bird, and especially Oak Cliff.
 
So I guess we can make thread titles with blatant lies in them, now.
 
Fort Fun Indiana said:
Oh, and:

Less than 14% of those arrested by ICE in Trump's 1st year back in office had violent criminal records, document shows​


www.cbsnews.com

Less than 14% of those arrested by ICE in Trump's 1st year back in office had violent criminal records, document shows

The official DHS statistics, which had not been previously reported, provide the most detailed look yet into who ICE has arrested during the Trump administration's crackdown.
www.cbsnews.com www.cbsnews.com
Click to expand...
Biden sure created a hell of a mess
 
As far as I am concerned 100% of illegals have a criminal record.
 
Seymour Flops said:
View attachment 1207282

This is what happens when law enforcement cooperates with law enforcement in inforcing the law.



Dallas is a Blue City, but it is a Texas Blue City, and Texas has laws against santuary policies. Laws actually being enforced by our Attorney General.

So ICE is able to make arrests at jails where communities do not have to be bothered, and the "activists" cannot commit violent acts against law enoforcement.
Click to expand...


Of the 8,000 individuals with criminal records or "pending criminal charges", what is the number for "pending criminal charges" out of the 8,000 are for the misdeomoener illegal entry charge for just crossing the border?

Just speaking logically, if you can "pending charge" every a very large number of illegal aliens with a misdemeanor illegal entry - that can make for a nice click-bait number.


WW
 
Fort Fun Indiana said:
Being here unlawfully is not a crime.
Click to expand...

HikerGuy83 said:
Do you know how stupid that reads.

What is your definition of unlawful?
Click to expand...

Technically he is correct.

Crossing the border without authorization is a misdeomoneor criminal offense. This applies to someone that walks across the border.

On the other hand it is not a criminal offense to be present in the country if you entered legally. At that point it is a civil offense not a criminal one. For example a person comes here on a student visa, drops out of school, and does not depart within the required time frame and remains. Because the entered legally, unlawful presence is not a crime.

WW
 
Fort Fun Indiana said:
Wrong. Being here unlawfully is not a crime. It's not even a misdemeanor.

Yet another white nationalist talking point down the drain. That's now two, including the lying thread title.
Click to expand...
Poor POC. She doesn’t understand that crossing the border illegally is a crime.
 
Hollie said:
Poor POC. She doesn’t understand that crossing the border illegally is a crime.
Click to expand...

Crossing the border is a crime, it's a misdeomenor (1st Offense).

Being present in the country unlawfully is not a crime, it is a civil violation. So if you entered the country legally but then didn't leave when you were supposed to no crime was committed.

Civil Offense? Yes Criminal Offense? No.

WW
 
WorldWatcher said:
On the other hand it is not a criminal offense to be present in the country if you entered legally. At that point it is a civil offense not a criminal one. For example a person comes here on a student visa, drops out of school, and does not depart within the required time frame and remains. Because the entered legally, unlawful presence is not a crime.
Click to expand...
I appreciate that distinction.

Is the person who entered legally but didn't leave when they should have....eligible for deportation?
 
WorldWatcher said:
Crossing the border is a crime, it's a misdeomenor (1st Offense).

Being present in the country unlawfully is not a crime, it is a civil violation. So if you entered the country legally but then didn't leave when you were supposed to no crime was committed.

Civil Offense? Yes Criminal Offense? No.

WW
Click to expand...
So yes. Crossing the border illegally is a crime. Remaining in the US after a removal order has been issued can also be a criminal offense.
 
15th post
Hollie said:
So yes. Crossing the border illegally is a crime. Remaining in the US after a removal order has been issued can also be a criminal offense.
Click to expand...

Can be yes. If a final removal order was issued. But now you are changing the context of the question by adding conditions.

Under 8 U.S.C. § 1253 there is a criminal penalty for violating the removal order, the penalty though is for violating the final removal order and not departing within 90 days.

The criminal part isn't being unlawfully present, it's for violating the final removal order. Those are two different thing.

WW

Loading…

uscode.house.gov
 
WorldWatcher said:
Of the 8,000 individuals with criminal records or "pending criminal charges", what is the number for "pending criminal charges" out of the 8,000 are for the misdeomoener illegal entry charge for just crossing the border?
Click to expand...
Zero, as far as I know. These are people who were in jail for crimes committed (or alleged) after crossing illegally or overstaying a visa and had detainers. I haven't heard of Dallas police arresting people for the misdemeanor of illegal crossing.

Do you know of any in that 8,000 who were "otherwise law-abiding" border jumpers?
WorldWatcher said:
Just speaking logically, if you can "pending charge" every a very large number of illegal aliens with a misdemeanor illegal entry - that can make for a nice click-bait number.


WW
Click to expand...
Well, sure, if they are being dishonest. Or they could have just made up a number out of whole cloth, for the clickbait.

But, why is NBC in the business of providing a platform for ICE to lie?

At least these ICE guys are on camera making these claims with their names on the chyron. Why is that less credible than the never named "sources" the media uses to create clickbait anti-Trump stories?
 
WorldWatcher said:
Can be yes. If a final removal order was issued. But now you are changing the context of the question by adding conditions.

Under 8 U.S.C. § 1253 there is a criminal penalty for violating the removal order, the penalty though is for violating the final removal order and not departing within 90 days.

The criminal part isn't being unlawfully present, it's for violating the final removal order. Those are two different thing.

WW

Loading…

uscode.house.gov
Click to expand...
There are not two different things regarding refusal to vacate after a removal order.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

ICE Arresting U.S. Citizens, Using Banned Chokeholds

< Previous Thread

National Guard Troops Mobilized in Minneapolis as Trump Threatens to Invoke Insurrection Act

Next Thread >

Similar threads

Dont Taz Me Bro
Oregon Democrats block plan to notify ICE on felons' release
Replies
2
Views
187
Cellblock2429
Cellblock2429
LeftofLeft
Activist Judge in Manhattan facilitates courtroom escape for illegal with criminal record.
2 3
Replies
42
Views
715
Mack The Finger
Mack The Finger
H
ICE ‘Detention Reengineering’ Plan Will Expand Capacity, Speed Deportation of Criminal Aliens
Replies
12
Views
292
1srelluc
1srelluc
Seymour Flops
Is ICE Conducting "Roving Patrols?"
2
Replies
33
Views
491
WorldWatcher
WorldWatcher
Dont Taz Me Bro
The Democratic Party is Ultimately Responsible for ICE
Replies
13
Views
313
Robert W
Robert W

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom