excalibur
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2015
- 18,149
- 34,371
- 2,290
Crazy Fani. Her own office uses the same tacking service to aid in the conviction of people of crimes, now she claims it is unreliable. Duh!
Does she realize what she is saying in this pleading?
Is she even an actual attorney who passed the BAR?
Does she realize what she is saying in this pleading?
Is she even an actual attorney who passed the BAR?
BREAKING: In court proceedings, Fulton County DA Fani Willis argues that the Atlanta Police Department's cell phone tracking software, in use since 2017, cannot "prove anything relevant" and provides "little evidentiary value."
Under DA Fani Willis' jurisdiction, the Atlanta Police Department has utilized Hawk Analytics' "CellHawk" software since 2017.
This very software documented Nathan Wade's alleged visits to Fani Willis' home 35 times before the purported beginning of their affair.
In a recent court filing, Willis argues that CellHawk's software fails to establish "anything relevant" and provides "little evidentiary value."
She further contends that CellHawk does not confirm "Special Prosecutor Wade's presence at any particular location or address."
According to Willis, CellHawk merely indicates that "Special Prosecutor Wade's telephone was located somewhere within a densely populated multiple-mile radius where various residences, restaurants, bars, nightclubs, and other businesses are located."
Does Fulton County DA Fani Willis maintain that the cellphone tracking software used by the Atlanta Police Department fails to "prove anything relevant" and offers "little evidentiary value"?
Since the adoption of CellHawk by the Atlanta Police Department in 2017, has the Fulton County District Attorney's office utilized this software to prosecute any cases?
Under DA Fani Willis' jurisdiction, the Atlanta Police Department has utilized Hawk Analytics' "CellHawk" software since 2017.
This very software documented Nathan Wade's alleged visits to Fani Willis' home 35 times before the purported beginning of their affair.
In a recent court filing, Willis argues that CellHawk's software fails to establish "anything relevant" and provides "little evidentiary value."
She further contends that CellHawk does not confirm "Special Prosecutor Wade's presence at any particular location or address."
According to Willis, CellHawk merely indicates that "Special Prosecutor Wade's telephone was located somewhere within a densely populated multiple-mile radius where various residences, restaurants, bars, nightclubs, and other businesses are located."
Does Fulton County DA Fani Willis maintain that the cellphone tracking software used by the Atlanta Police Department fails to "prove anything relevant" and offers "little evidentiary value"?
Since the adoption of CellHawk by the Atlanta Police Department in 2017, has the Fulton County District Attorney's office utilized this software to prosecute any cases?