First tell me what relevance this has to any sort of legal argument. Maybe Nathan Wade's qualifications matter to you subjectively if you're the one hiring him but in this case you aren't the one hiring him so your opinion doesn't matter. In what Universe do you imagine a defendant giving the opinion that his prosecutor is unqualified is the beginning and end of the argument and prosecution?
Fani is the one empowered to hire him and beyond the objective qualification, which he meets, the only subjective opinion that matters beyond that is hers.