JGalt
Diamond Member
- Mar 9, 2011
- 79,146
- 102,323
- 3,635
Damn! It was to be kept a secret!
Oh shit. Now they'll probably turn me into a zombie.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Damn! It was to be kept a secret!
The 1960s called. They want their excuses back.A number of different things. Racist housing policies that cemented segregated neighborhoods and vast economic disparities between white and black American families and tying public education funding to property taxes collected in those segregated neighborhoods certainly doesn't help.
If nothing is ever done to address the inequalities of the psst don't expect the disparities to unwind themselves.The 1960s called. They want their excuses back.
There is no such thing. The median net worth of white families in America is $170,000 composted to the $17,000 net worth of the median black family.If that were true, the "white neighborhoods" would have similar statistics to the "black neighborhoods".
What makes you think these schools need equal funding? They need equitable funding. If a run down school in a poor black neighborhood starts receiving the same funding as a wealthy majority white school in a wealthy one do you think that means they can both now spend the same amount of dollars educating their students? Well if the older school in a poorer neighborhood needs more maintenence and more renovations then they aren't. If a larger percentage of their students rely on school breakfast and lunch programs then they can't. These schools may require more funding.California has been evenly distributing school funding for quite some time now. See prop 13.
Furthermore, this is statistic analysis within the same school district. The same school district has the same funding. So what are you saying?
![]()
How Proposition 13 Transformed Neighborhood Public Schools Throughout California | KQED
After the 1978 measure, decisions once made by local officials over how to spend funds for schools and how to educate and evaluate students shifted to state policymakers.www.kqed.org
So, is that still your excuse?
A number of different things. Racist housing policies that cemented segregated neighborhoods and vast economic disparities between white and black American families and tying public education funding to property taxes collected in those segregated neighborhoods certainly doesn't help.
So, what do you recommend (I already know, I just want to you put it in writing)?If nothing is ever done to address the inequalities of the psst don't expect the disparities to unwind themselves.
The stats in this article are about THE SAME SCHOOL DISTRICT. AND prop 13. Median income is IRRELEVANT.There is no such thing. The median net worth of white families in America is $170,000 composted to the $17,000 net worth of the median black family.
What does this mean? Black kids need more funding than white kids? If so, why?What makes you think these schools need equal funding? They need equitable funding.
AGAIN, this is WITHIN the SAME FUCKING SCHOOL DISTRICT.If a run down school in a poor black neighborhood starts receiving the same funding as a wealthy majority white school in a wealthy one do you think that means they can both now spend the same amount of dollars educating their students? Well if the older school in a poorer neighborhood needs more maintenence and more renovations then they aren't. If a larger percentage of their students rely on school breakfast and lunch programs then they can't. These schools may require more funding.
Yeah, that's pretty much what he is saying. It's the same old canned excuse.So worse housing and less funding in San Francisco schools is why the white kids in the same
buildings have higher scores?
Yes. Economic disparities between white and black families can lead to vastly different outcomes.So worse housing and less funding in San Francisco schools is why the white kids in the same
buildings have higher scores?
How?Yes. Economic disparities between white and black families can lead to vastly different outcomes.
Why is median wealth irrelevant? What does it matter if they are in the same district? First of all the article I posted showed that there's an over 20 billion dollar funding gap between majority white school districts and majority black districts. Secondly there can be widely varying standards within the same district in a lot of urban communities. In Miami my High school Miami Killian was in the middle of a wealthy Miami neighborhood but because the district was so expansive it bled a little in Richmond Heights, where I grew up. The district also included Palmetto Highschool where our most recent Supreme Court Justice went that included wealthy Kendall neighborhoods and poor neighborhoods in Perrine.So, what do you recommend (I already know, I just want to you put it in writing)?
EDIT: Never mind. You edited to include your recommendation. Socialism. What a surprise.
The stats in this article are about THE SAME SCHOOL DISTRICT. AND prop 13. Median income is IRRELEVANT.
What does this mean? Black kids need more funding than white kids? If so, why?
AGAIN, this is WITHIN the SAME FUCKING SCHOOL DISTRICT.
![]()
That goes back to median household income. Just because white and black students are in the same school district or even the same school doesn't mean they have the same economic circumstances.How?
School is school. The funding in this school district is equal. Wouldn't poor white kids get the same results?
The median net worth of white families in America is $170,000 composted to the $17,000 net worth of the median black family.
Yes. Economic disparities between white and black families can lead to vastly different outcomes.
You're not making the case for any connection between economic circumstances and math proficiency.That goes back to median household income. Just because white and black students are in the same school district or even the same school doesn't mean they have the same economic circumstances.
Every child has two parents and despite marriage rates black fathers are the most involved childrens lives. Also black communities in general tend to believe more than whites than raising children is a group effort with grandparents, aunts, uncles and cousins all playing a role.Two parent households have higher net worths, regardless of race.
Every child has two parents and despite marriage rates black fathers are the most involved childrens lives. Also black communities in general tend to believe more than whites than raising children is a group effort with grandparents, aunts, uncles and cousins all playing a role.
Race/Ethnic Differences in Nonresident Fathers’ Involvement after a Nonmarital Birth
However even when we look at black families who are married, who have college educations and who earn high incomes even then there is a disparity of results between them and their white counterparts.
What makes you think poor white kids aren't over represented in that 30% who aren't proficient just as blacks are over represented in poverty? In fact what is your argument?You're not making the case for any connection between economic circumstances and math proficiency.
If that were true, poor white kids would have the same problem, no? You're not suggesting that, of the 70% of the white kids who are proficient in math in that school district, 100% of them are all rich kids and none of them are poor, are you?
Do you have an data at all to suggest black fathers aren't involved in their children's lives other than marriage rates?Every child has two parents and despite marriage rates black fathers are the most involved childrens lives.
Do you have anything beyond this single study?
However even when we look at black families who are married, who have college educations and who earn high incomes even then there is a disparity of results between them and their white counterparts.
Younger families tend to have lower net worths than older ones.
My argument is that 70% of white kids are proficient, 13% of black kids are proficient.What makes you think poor white kids aren't over represented in that 30% who aren't proficient just as blacks are over represented in poverty? In fact what is your argument?
Do you have an data at all to suggest black fathers aren't involved in their children's lives other than marriage rates?
Black Families of every age have ten times less wealth than white families and we all know why.