Impeachment articles hit judge who ordered Trump to stop Tren de Aragua deportation flights

[Sherlock Holmes]

Anyway, this is boring as usual, just a bunch of fanatical magat sycophants stamping their feet.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

I can see them trying to impeach Trump on this.

Crossing the Ruby-Red Rubicon

The Roman Senate tried to do that to Julius Caesar, so there is historical precedent for what Trump can do about it. Or he could do what Boris Yeltsin did in the same situation.

 

[SeaMajor7]

I did read it and notice the attempt to pain a crime organization to a government.

That does not change that the law requires either a declaration of war of the innovation by a foreign government to trigger AEA.

TdA is not a foreign government, it's a drug gang.



He didn't provide due process as his application of the statue violates the law.



I don't support the violent criminals. As I clearly said above, lock them up in a US jail and process them correctly. If the individual is a criminal? Prosecute them and send them to prission. If they are not convicted and still illegal, deport them to their home country.

That isn't supporting violet criminal gangs, it's supporting the Constitution.

You know? "Faithful execution of the laws of the United States" Ever hear that phrase before?

WW

The American People have HAD IT with your fucking LAWFARE against President Trump. We ELECTED him to get rid of CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIENS and that's exactly what he's doing.

 

[Rawley]

I did read it and notice the attempt to pain a crime organization to a government.

That does not change that the law requires either a declaration of war of the innovation by a foreign government to trigger AEA.

TdA is not a foreign government, it's a drug gang.

LOL Under your interpretation, we can employ mercenaries to invade Mexico and claim we're not involved in the invasion.

Interesting.

 

[WorldWatcher]

The American People have HAD IT with your fucking LAWFARE against President Trump. We ELECTED him to get rid of CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIENS and that's exactly what he's doing.

I'd rather put CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIENS in - you know - PRISON after conviction.

WW

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Yes, it should. But this back-bencher decided to make himself President For A Day

View attachment 1090859

Jack Bailey's Ghost Will Give Him a Ping-Pong Paddle He Can Pretend Is a Gavel

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

MAGA Republicans are fascists. The rule of law is under attack.

The Ruleoflaw Is the Rule of Lawyers

 

[SeaMajor7]

I'd rather put CRIMINAL ILLEGAL ALIENS in - you know - PRISON after conviction.

WW

We elected Trump to DEPORT THEM.
They are now IN PRISON.
Win-win.
You're welcome.

 

[22lcidw]

View attachment 1090862

You magats really need to grow up, acting like teenagers watching a fucking Captain America movie, FFS.

What we have now is two diametrically opposed power bases with little tolerating of the other. Progs are for the first time in a long time fighting with each other. They usually vote in unison on far-left extremist legislation. Republicans are slowly weeding out RINOS and NEO CONS as we see even with some of the judges they vote on.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

So this is your interpretation of what's reported in the news, not what's actually reported?



as is this you said earlier too:



These represent nothing more than your opinion based on scant details present in the news. You have no source corroborating your interpretation do you?

The Judge also says


and



The Judge seems confident here, this is all public discourse and his reputation would be in tatters if he had this fundamentally wrong. He also has high level security clearance and has presided over these kinds of cases many times.

It's pretty obvious that a US plane under control of US government agents is subject to US jurisdiction, I mean imagine a US bomber pilot disobeying an order from his commander on the basis that he's no longer in US airspace? Do you think he'd be court martialed for that?

It isn't the plane itself over which he has jurisdiction but the agents of the US government, one cannot claim that only the executive branch has jurisdiction but not the judiciary.

How do you think US war crimes committed outside the US have been tried here in the US?

The judge is wrong. He has no power beyond the water's edge.

US war crimes, allegedly committed by Americans are under the jurisdiction of the US and are tried by the US. War crimes, even if considered by the US as war crimes, committed on foreign soil by foreign nationals are beyond the jurisdiction of American courts. Otherwise, why bother with a president at all? If judges can decide foreign policy and rule on international acts we have an unelected politburo.

 

[konradv]

Why? Biden did away or ignored our immigration laws.

Cite?

 

[konradv]

Wormy Democrats lie.

Roberts rebuked Trump.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

The judge is wrong. He has no power beyond the water's edge.

Can you provide a source for this claim please? Why would only one branch of government have authority over US officials outside of US airspace?

US war crimes, allegedly committed by Americans are under the jurisdiction of the US and are tried by the US. War crimes, even if considered by the US as war crimes, committed on foreign soil by foreign nationals are beyond the jurisdiction of American courts. Otherwise, why bother with a president at all? If judges can decide foreign policy and rule on international acts we have an unelected politburo.

 

[Edgetho]

The judge is wrong. He has no power beyond the water's edge.

US war crimes, allegedly committed by Americans are under the jurisdiction of the US and are tried by the US. War crimes, even if considered by the US as war crimes, committed on foreign soil by foreign nationals are beyond the jurisdiction of American courts. Otherwise, why bother with a president at all? If judges can decide foreign policy and rule on international acts we have an unelected politburo.

The problem is with Judges simply awarding themselves jurisdiction. They have been arbitrarilly giving themselves power for the last 223 years. Power not given to them by the Legislative branch, not by the Executive Branch and certainly not by the Constituion.

Judges are assuming power they don't have. We live in a dictatorship of the Judicial Branch which is no different that a dictatorship of a King, a President or a Duma.

They award themselves power out of thin air. And THAT is what has to stop. It's been going on too long.

I even dispute that the Judicial Branch is a 'co-equal' branch of government. The Executive can be destroyed by the legislative branch (impeachment) and the Judicial can be destroyed in the same amnner.

But the Judicial has no power over either. They can't impeach, they can't remove. But the Judicial can be. The Executive has control of the Police and the Military. The Judicial has control of -- Their bathroom schedule.

The Judicial Branch are trying to become major players where they have no right to be. They are pencil pushers, paper shufflers, pinch-faced scolds. Their orders can only be carried out by the Executive and they are currently over-stepping their bounds. Bigly.

And the worst part is -- They're doing it for political reasons. No doubt about it. They'll lie and mutter some shit about 'due process' but it's about politics and we all know it.

It's time they got snapped back, put in their place. If SCOTUS is too gutless to do it, as apparently they are, then OMB has to do it for them

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Can you provide a source for this claim please? Why would only one branch of government have authority over US officials outside of US airspace?

You need an entire course of study to find out just how wrong you are. According to you, American courts have power of every blessed soul on the planet.

We have separation of powers. The executive branch is separate and apart from the judicial branch. The courts do not control the President. Especially with extrajudicial ex parte proceedings.

 

[konradv]

The problem is with Judges simply awarding themselves jurisdiction. They have been arbitrarilly giving themselves power for the last 223 years. Power not given to them by the Legislative branch, not by the Executive Branch and certainly not by the Constituion.

Judges are assuming power they don't have. We live in a dictatorship of the Judicial Branch which is no different that a dictatorship of a King, a President or a Duma.

They award themselves power out of thin air. And THAT is what has to stop. It's been going on too long.

I even dispute that the Judicial Branch is a 'co-equal' branch of government. The Executive can be destroyed by the legislative branch (impeachment) and the Judicial can be destroyed in the same amnner.

But the Judicial has no power over either. They can't impeach, they can't remove. But the Judicial can be. The Executive has control of the Police and the Military. The Judicial has control of -- Their bathroom schedule.

The Judicial Branch are trying to become major players where they have no right to be. They are pencil pushers, paper shufflers, pinch-faced scolds. Their orders can only be carried out by the Executive and they are currently over-stepping their bounds. Bigly.

And the worst part is -- They're doing it for political reasons. No doubt about it. They'll lie and mutter some shit about 'due process' but it's about politics and we all know it.

It's time they got snapped back, put in their place. If SCOTUS is too gutless to do it, as apparently they are, then OMB has to do it for them

Judges are the backbone of democracy. They’re there to make sure we live up to the laws and Constitution. Attacks on the judiciary are fascism writ large.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

You need an entire course of study to find out just how wrong you are.

Or a source that proves me wrong (and the Judge).

According to you, American courts have power of every blessed soul on the planet.

That's not true, I made no such claim and you know that, go and check.

We have separation of powers. The executive branch is separate and apart from the judicial branch. The courts do not control the President. Especially with extrajudicial ex parte proceedings.

Right, but my question was how can one branch of government have authority in international airspace when there are three branches of government? Can you cite a single source for your belief?

Anyway you have not provided a source and so I have no reason to regard your claims as anything more that personal opinion and pretty extremist at that, very un American in fact.

 

[Correll]

Just In!

It's going to be a tough row to hoe, getting this piece of shit impeached. democrats stick together and -- We all know why,

But still, this has got to be embarrassing. And then there's Doscovery.

Fun City!!

SCOOP: Impeachment articles hit judge who ordered Trump to stop Tren de Aragua deportation flights

A House Republican is moving to impeach the federal judge who ordered the Trump administration to stop some of its deportation flights.

www.foxnews.com

A House GOP lawmaker has filed impeachment articles against the federal judge who ordered the Trump administration to stop deportation flights being conducted under the Alien Enemies Act.

"For the past several weeks, we've seen several rogue activist judges try to impede the president from exercising, not only the mandate voters gave him, but his democratic and constitutional authority to keep the American people safe," Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, told Fox News Digital. "This is another example of a rogue judge overstepping his…authority."

Gill's resolution, first obtained by Fox News Digital, accused U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg of abusing his power in levying an emergency pause on the Trump administration's plans to deport illegal immigrants under a wartime authority first issued in 1798, which President Donald Trump recently invoked to get members of the criminal Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua out of the U.S

Loading…

media.tenor.com

 

[excalibur]

The reason the media and the Deep State is calling Trump a dictator is because they want to foment hatred for anything he does in response to their ridiculous planned actions.

Judges don't have the right to create laws from the bench.

The more ridiculous these corrupt judges act, the more aggressive they hope Trump becomes.

And many of these issues have been settled, including a court cannot enjoin a President from exercising his ministerial powers.

But Roberts plays the game, slowly, and thus we are where we are because Roberts, and his little doppelgänger Barrett, refused to act weeks ago in the Dellinger matter when the four true Constitutionalists saw the need for speedy action to nip all this in the bud.

 

[Edgetho]

Crossing the Ruby-Red Rubicon

The Roman Senate tried to do that to Julius Caesar, so there is historical precedent for what Trump can do about it. Or he could do what Boris Yeltsin did in the same situation.

That is quite a reach. Rome didn't have a President or a King. They hated the thought of a single man with that much power -- Except in times of great crisis..... War, usually. When that happened, the Roman Senate would appoint a Dictator. For a limited time. Often one year or less.

Julius Caesar was a dictator and when it came time for him to step down, he decided he liked the job too much to give it up.

So Rome went from a Republic to a dictatorial empire.

It's cool that you want to get high during the day, just don't post.......