Impeachment articles hit judge who ordered Trump to stop Tren de Aragua deportation flights

[Rawley]

No he isn't. He's invoking the Alien Enemy Act. To invoke it it requires:

• Declaration of war by Congress. OR
• Invasion by a foreign government

So when did the government of Venezuela invade the US.

It was laid out very clearly in the Proclamation. Did you read it? What do you disagree with?

Was it a land attack, seaborne landing on the beach, or did they parachute troops into Wyoming?

WW

Got it, you're not being serious. Have a blessed day.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

I gave you the oath! Stop being a democrat for a minute and learn something.

I never asked about the oath, I can go and dig that out anytime.

Please explain why a Judge disagreeing with a right wing president shows political bias but a judge agreeing with a right wing president does not.

 

[Edgetho]

No he isn't. He's invoking the Alien Enemy Act. To invoke it it requires:

• Declaration of war by Congress. OR
• Invasion by a foreign government

So when did the government of Venezuela invade the US. Was it a land attack, seaborne landing on the beach, or did they parachute troops into Wyoming?

WW

Bottom line is, dimocrap scumbag, you want to keep murdering, raping terrorists in the Country. Note, that is not a question, it is a statment of fact.

Do not bore me with your 'Due Process' bullshit.

Someday, we might be deporting dimocrap scum. Wouldn't that be nice

 

[Edgetho]

It was laid out very clearly in the Proclamation. Did you read it? What do you disagree with?

Got it, you're not being serious. Have a blessed day.

This POS didn't read shit other than what he saw in the the DISGUSTING FILTH.

The View is about their Intellectual limit.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

I never asked about the oath, I can go and dig that out anytime.

Please explain why a Judge disagreeing with a right wing president shows political bias but a judge agreeing with a right wing president does not.

You have presented no facts, not even a same case that would require any decision as to agreement or disagreement.

The agreement or disagreement is normally presented to a judge in the form of briefs discussing both sides. Normally these briefs are supported by Amicus Briefs by persons unrelated to the subject but interested in the outcome. What points have been presented to this judge? None? It was a request by degenerate democrat lawyers without a hearing. The judge purports to exercise jurisdiction over aircraft in international airspace. Of course a judge or justice can't do that. Compounding this bit of activist nonsense, the Judge purports to exercise jurisdiction over the President of a foreign country by ordering him to cease the inhumane treatment of his prisoners and to return them to the United States. That's total partisan bullshit.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

You have presented no facts, not even a same case that would require any decision as to agreement or disagreement.

The agreement or disagreement is normally presented to a judge in the form of briefs discussing both sides. Normally these briefs are supported by Amicus Briefs by persons unrelated to the subject but interested in the outcome. What points have been presented to this judge? None? It was a request by degenerate democrat lawyers without a hearing. The judge purports to exercise jurisdiction over aircraft in international airspace. Of course a judge or justice can't do that. Compounding this bit of activist nonsense, the Judge purports to exercise jurisdiction over the President of a foreign country by ordering him to cease the inhumane treatment of his prisoners and to return them to the United States. That's total partisan bullshit.

So you disagree with this Judge, that's clear, so let me ask are you a federal Judge? are you a federal attorney? have you passed the bar exam in any state?

 

[Edgetho]

You have presented no facts, not even a same case that would require any decision as to agreement or disagreement.

The agreement or disagreement is normally presented to a judge in the form of briefs discussing both sides. Normally these briefs are supported by Amicus Briefs by persons unrelated to the subject but interested in the outcome. What points have been presented to this judge? None? It was a request by degenerate democrat lawyers without a hearing. The judge purports to exercise jurisdiction over aircraft in international airspace. Of course a judge or justice can't do that. Compounding this bit of activist nonsense, the Judge purports to exercise jurisdiction over the President of a foreign country by ordering him to cease the inhumane treatment of his prisoners and to return them to the United States. That's total partisan bullshit.

dimocrap scum keep writing our 2026 Campaign Ads for us!!

 

[EvilCat Breath]

So you disagree with this Judge, that's clear, so let me ask are you a Judge? are you an attorney? have you passed the bar exam in any state?

I passed the California bar exam. Does that count?

This is an ex parte ruling, without both parties being heard and purports to exert judicial authority over international acts and foreign leaders. =

 

[WorldWatcher]

It was laid out very clearly in the Proclamation.

The Proclamation doesn't comply with the law.

Did you read it?

Yes.

What do you disagree with?

The designation of a criminal organization as a Terrorist Organization does not trigger Trump's ability to dispense with Due Process. The law clearly says that to trigger it, one of the following must be true:

• Declaration of war by Congress. OR
• Invasion by a foreign government

Got it, you're not being serious. Have a blessed day.

Very serious. Trump swore to follow the Constitution which means faithfully executing the laws passed by Congress.

I have no problem with locking the gang members up, and after due process deporting them (or charge and try them criminally).

But buying prison space in a 3rd party country under a commercial prison deal to get them out of US court reach? No.

But them in a US jail and deal with them here. Then prison or deportation to their home country.

WW
.
.
.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

I passed the California bar exam. Does that count?

Sure, it means something I guess.

This is an ex parte ruling, without both parties being heard and purports to exert judicial authority over international acts and foreign leaders. =

Who has raised this complaint? is there a source showing that trump's team share your concerns?

 

[WorldWatcher]

Bottom line is, dimocrap scumbag, you want to keep murdering, raping terrorists in the Country. Note, that is not a question, it is a statment of fact.

Do not bore me with your 'Due Process' bullshit.

Someday, we might be deporting dimocrap scum. Wouldn't that be nice

Internet chest thumping from some in their grandmothers basement.

Why don't you leave conversations to the adults.

WW

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Sure, it means something I guess.

Who has raised this complaint? is there a source showing that trump's team share your concerns?

Apparently they DO since they complained about the judge and refused to follow the illegal order.

 

[Mac-7]

Just In!

It's going to be a tough row to hoe, getting this piece of shit impeached. democrats stick together and -- We all know why,

But still, this has got to be embarrassing. And then there's Doscovery.

Fun City!!

SCOOP: Impeachment articles hit judge who ordered Trump to stop Tren de Aragua deportation flights

A House Republican is moving to impeach the federal judge who ordered the Trump administration to stop some of its deportation flights.

www.foxnews.com

A House GOP lawmaker has filed impeachment articles against the federal judge who ordered the Trump administration to stop deportation flights being conducted under the Alien Enemies Act.

"For the past several weeks, we've seen several rogue activist judges try to impede the president from exercising, not only the mandate voters gave him, but his democratic and constitutional authority to keep the American people safe," Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, told Fox News Digital. "This is another example of a rogue judge overstepping his…authority."

Gill's resolution, first obtained by Fox News Digital, accused U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg of abusing his power in levying an emergency pause on the Trump administration's plans to deport illegal immigrants under a wartime authority first issued in 1798, which President Donald Trump recently invoked to get members of the criminal Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua out of the U.S

Federal judges are almost untouchable

Which makes them a threat to our republic

 

[debbiedowner]

I'd rather wait for a smackdown from the SC on him, but that's a more iffy possibility.

Any issue that involves the Sitting President and involves Presidential orders should go directly to the SC.

Roberts said today you cannot impeach a federal judge just because you disagree with them. So if it goes to SCOTUS only thomas and alito will side with trump

 

[martybegan]

Roberts said today you cannot impeach a federal judge just because you disagree with them. So if it goes to SCOTUS only thomas and alito will side with trump

That's about the impeachment, not about the merits of the case, or if the District judge even has actual jurisdiction, not only on the merits, but even if he can really issue a TRO that makes planes change direction.

 

[Rawley]

The Proclamation doesn't comply with the law.



Yes.



The designation of a criminal organization as a Terrorist Organization does not trigger Trump's ability to dispense with Due Process. The law clearly says that to trigger it, one of the following must be true:

• Declaration of war by Congress. OR
• Invasion by a foreign government

Well, clearly you didn't read the Proclamation or would would have noticed the five paragraphs explaining how this terrorist organization is connected to and acting on behalf of Venezuela

Very serious. Trump swore to follow the Constitution which means faithfully executing the laws passed by Congress.

I have no problem with locking the gang members up, and after due process deporting them (or charge and try them criminally).

Trump provided all the due process required under the statute.

Why you and your Trump hating cult has chosen to support these violent criminal gangs is truly beyond comprehension.

 

[TimFitz]

That says NOTHING about the merits of what the District Judge has done.

No, it’s about a right wing political stunt.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Apparently they DO since they complained about the judge and refused to follow the illegal order.

So this is your interpretation of what's reported in the news, not what's actually reported?

This is an ex parte ruling, without both parties being heard and purports to exert judicial authority over international acts and foreign leaders

as is this you said earlier too:

The agreement or disagreement is normally presented to a judge in the form of briefs discussing both sides. Normally these briefs are supported by Amicus Briefs by persons unrelated to the subject but interested in the outcome. What points have been presented to this judge? None? It was a request by degenerate democrat lawyers without a hearing. The judge purports to exercise jurisdiction over aircraft in international airspace. Of course a judge or justice can't do that. Compounding this bit of activist nonsense, the Judge purports to exercise jurisdiction over the President of a foreign country by ordering him to cease the inhumane treatment of his prisoners and to return them to the United States.

These represent nothing more than your opinion based on scant details present in the news. You have no source corroborating your interpretation do you?

The Judge also says

"My equitable powers are pretty clear that they do not lapse at the water's edge," Boasberg replied.

and

“I’m just asking how you think my equitable powers do not attach to a plane that has departed the U.S., even if it’s in international airspace,” Boasberg added at another point.

The Judge seems confident here, this is all public discourse and his reputation would be in tatters if he had this fundamentally wrong. He also has high level security clearance and has presided over these kinds of cases many times.

It's pretty obvious that a US plane under control of US government agents is subject to US jurisdiction, I mean imagine a US bomber pilot disobeying an order from his commander on the basis that he's no longer in US airspace? Do you think he'd be court martialed for that?

It isn't the plane itself over which he has jurisdiction but the agents of the US government, one cannot claim that only the executive branch has jurisdiction but not the judiciary.

How do you think US war crimes committed outside the US have been tried here in the US?

 

[martybegan]

No, it’s about a right wing political stunt.

So you admit impeachments are a political stunt these days?

 

[WorldWatcher]

Well, clearly you didn't read the Proclamation or would would have noticed the five paragraphs explaining how this terrorist organization is connected to and acting on behalf of Venezuela

I did read it and notice the attempt to pain a crime organization to a government.

That does not change that the law requires either a declaration of war of the innovation by a foreign government to trigger AEA.

TdA is not a foreign government, it's a drug gang.

Trump provided all the due process required under the statute.

He didn't provide due process as his application of the statue violates the law.

Why you and your Trump hating cult has chosen to support these violent criminal gangs is truly beyond comprehension.

I don't support the violent criminals. As I clearly said above, lock them up in a US jail and process them correctly. If the individual is a criminal? Prosecute them and send them to prission. If they are not convicted and still illegal, deport them to their home country.

That isn't supporting violet criminal gangs, it's supporting the Constitution.

You know? "Faithful execution of the laws of the United States" Ever hear that phrase before?

WW