Impeachment articles hit judge who ordered Trump to stop Tren de Aragua deportation flights

[Sherlock Holmes]

Not at all. Since judges are required to be inherently politically neutral. It goes with the job. Otherwise all of their rulings are suspect, exactly as they are suspect here.

How do you establish that a Judge is not acting in a politically neutral manner? If a Judge disagrees on a point of law, with a right wing president, does that prove to you that the Judge is not neutral? If he agreed with him, would that not also prove he was not neutral?

 

[The Irish Ram]

Did you hear the one prisoner, formerly known by democrats as the "new American"?
"It ain't no 5-star hotel, but at least they feed us."
There you go. Everybody is happy but the judge.

 

[The Irish Ram]

How do you establish that a Judge is not acting in a politically neutral manner?

By the amount of money he took from Soros...

 

[BluesLegend]

Turncoat justice Roberts already poo-pooed the idea of impeaching this hack judge.

 

[martybegan]

Trump doesn’t have the right to create laws from the WH.

Every executive order he issues is based on a law passed by Congress.

 

[jknowgood]

Trump doesn’t have the right to create laws from the WH.

Why? Biden did away or ignored our immigration laws.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

How do you establish that a Judge is not acting in a politically neutral manner? If a Judge disagrees on a point of law, with a right wing president, does that prove to you that the Judge is not neutral? If he agreed with him, would that not also prove he was not neutral?

Did you ever notice that during the State of the Union address, the justices of the Supreme Court sit in the front, in the middle and not on either side? Judicial neutrality is a given. If not, there are ethics complaints that can be made.

Threre is more than one way to remove a judge and impeachment is not the only way. Start winding him up with ethics complaints. Go back to every one of his rulings, his political actions and start nit picking.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

So you want to persecute judges who aren’t conservative?

It's hard to believe that our educational system has become so abysmal that these basic civics lessons are no longer being taught.

 

[Rawley]

The judge isn't creating law.

He's applying the law passed by Congress.

You know, the one Trump took an oath to faithfully execute.

WW

The law was passed by Congress. Trump is following it. The judge isn't.

 

[Marener]

It's hard to believe that our educational system has become so abysmal that these basic civics lessons are no longer being taught.

In my schools, we learned about how democracies were perverted to become fascist authoritarian states.

One such step included taking control of the judiciary and eliminating judges that stood in the way of centralization of authority.

That's where we are at.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

I find it interesting that Democrats went after Trump at least twice using laws from long ago and yet they claim that Trump can't use a law on the books from 1798.

This will be revisited in 2026 when we street sweep more democrats out of the way.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Did you ever notice that during the State of the Union address, the justices of the Supreme Court sit in the front, in the middle and not on either side? Judicial neutrality is a given. If not, there are ethics complaints that can be made.

Threre is more than one way to remove a judge and impeachment is not the only way. Start winding him up with ethics complaints. Go back to every one of his rulings, his political actions and start nit picking.

If he agreed with him, would that not also prove he was not neutral?

Surely I should file an ethics complaint when a Judge agrees with me? yes? he's not being neutral.

Your logic is non existent, if a Judge agrees with me he's neutral and if he doesn't he's not, and you talk of education standards?

 

[WorldWatcher]

The law was passed by Congress. Trump is following it. The judge isn't.

No he isn't. He's invoking the Alien Enemy Act. To invoke it it requires:

• Declaration of war by Congress. OR
• Invasion by a foreign government

So when did the government of Venezuela invade the US. Was it a land attack, seaborne landing on the beach, or did they parachute troops into Wyoming?

WW

 

[EvilCat Breath]

If he agreed with him, would that not also prove he was not neutral?

Depends on the grounds the agreement was made. Judges are bound, and take an OATH to be neutral .

Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, _ _, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and IMPARTIALLY discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as ___ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”

Start with a fine tooth comb and go over every one of his rulings starting from day one and tie him up in ethics complaints until he is removed for cause.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

This will be revisited in 2026 when we street sweep more democrats out of the way.

Look at the declared non-fascist advocating

Depends on the grounds the agreement was made. Judges are bound, and take an OATH to be neutral .

Each justice or judge of the United States shall take the following oath or affirmation before performing the duties of his office: “I, _ , do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and IMPARTIALLY discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me as __ under the Constitution and laws of the United States. So help me God.”

Start with a fine tooth comb and go over every one of his rulings starting from day one and tie him up in ethics complaints until he is removed for cause.

But so far as I can tell so far, all you've maintained here is that a judge's agreeing raises no questions of judicial bias but disagreeing raises questions of judicial bias.

Is that your position?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Look at the declared non-fascist advocating


But so far as I can tell so far, all you've maintained here is that a judge's agreeing raises no questions of bias but disagreeing raises questions of bias.

Is that your position?

My position is that judges have a obligation to be neutral and this judge is partisan. That's why degenerate democrats chose this activist judge. What else has he been activist about?

 

[Edgetho]

I find it interesting that Democrats went after Trump at least twice using laws from long ago and yet they claim that Trump can't use a law on the books from 1798.

dimocraps are scum

Does it not just shock the shit out of you that dimocrap FILTH are defending a POS Judge that wants to keep Rapists, Murderers and Baby Killers in the Country?

If there is a choice between good and evil, dimocrap scum defend evil every time.

If there is a Choice between the American People and -- Anything else, especially if it's scuzzy and low-lifey, dimocrap scum will side against America and The American People..... EVERY.FUCKING.TIME!

I am not kidding around when I refer to them as scum. That IS what they are. Especially the voters

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

My position is that judges have a obligation to be neutral and this judge is partisan.

Yes they do have that obligation. Now please stop evading my question.

Do you determine the Judge is partisan because he disagrees with trump's team?

If he agreed with trump's team why would that not also be evidence that he was partisan?

That's why degenerate democrats chose this activist judge. What else has he been activist about?

He's not a political activist.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Yes they do have that obligation. Now please stop evading my question.

Do you determine the Judge is partisan because he disagrees with trump's team?

If he agreed with trump's team why would that not also be evidence that he was partisan?

He's not a political activist.

I gave you the oath! Stop being a democrat for a minute and learn something.

 

[Independent thinker]

dimocraps are scum

Does it not just shock the shit out of you that dimocrap FILTH are defending a POS Judge that wants to keep Rapists, Murderers and Baby Killers in the Country?

If there is a choice between good and evil, dimocrap scum defend evil every time.

If there is a Choice between the American People and -- Anything else, especially if it's scuzzy and low-lifey, dimocrap scum will side against America and The American People..... EVERY.FUCKING.TIME!

I am not kidding around when I refer to them as scum. That IS what they are. Especially the voters

I'd like to disagree with you that they can't possbily be that bad, BUT, they really are that bad.