Impeachment articles hit judge who ordered Trump to stop Tren de Aragua deportation flights

Just In!

It's going to be a tough row to hoe, getting this piece of shit impeached. democrats stick together and -- We all know why,

But still, this has got to be embarrassing. And then there's Doscovery.

Fun City!!


A House GOP lawmaker has filed impeachment articles against the federal judge who ordered the Trump administration to stop deportation flights being conducted under the Alien Enemies Act.

"For the past several weeks, we've seen several rogue activist judges try to impede the president from exercising, not only the mandate voters gave him, but his democratic and constitutional authority to keep the American people safe," Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, told Fox News Digital. "This is another example of a rogue judge overstepping his…authority."

Gill's resolution, first obtained by Fox News Digital, accused U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg of abusing his power in levying an emergency pause on the Trump administration's plans to deport illegal immigrants under a wartime authority first issued in 1798, which President Donald Trump recently invoked to get members of the criminal Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua out of the U.S

fuck that fucking, fucker.webp
 
The judge isn't creating law.

He's applying the law passed by Congress.

You know, the one Trump took an oath to faithfully execute.

WW

You flagged my post as fake news.

What law did Trump attempt to invoke and what are the conditions for invoking the law?

Do you know?

WW
 
Any issue that involves the Sitting President and involves Presidential orders should go directly to the SC.
Thats...a good idea actually. One issue of course is that would open them up to potentially hundreds of cases every year. They could however make it their policy to overhear EO cases or mayhaps restrict themselves in some manner.
Alternatively" Congress could Constitutionally create special courts of Review for Presidential EOs. It can create courts and jurisdictions.
 
Thats...a good idea actually. One issue of course is that would open them up to potentially hundreds of cases every year. They could however make it their policy to overhear EO cases or mayhaps restrict themselves in some manner.
Alternatively" Congress could Constitutionally create special courts of Review for Presidential EOs. It can create courts and jurisdictions.

Great, more government....
 
The judge should not be impeached over his rulings. He should be impeached because of the unethical conduct that caused and resulted from his rulings. That would require an investigation as to his political leanings and donations as well as past acts and rulings.
 
The judge should not be impeached over his rulings. He should be impeached because of the unethical conduct that caused and resulted from his rulings. That would require an investigation as to his political leanings and donations as well as past acts and rulings.
:boohoo:
 
The judge should not be impeached over his rulings. He should be impeached because of the unethical conduct that caused and resulted from his rulings. That would require an investigation as to his political leanings and donations as well as past acts and rulings.
Investigating people for their political leanings is pretty fascist.
 
Investigating people for their political leanings is pretty fascist.
Not at all. Since judges are required to be inherently politically neutral. It goes with the job. Otherwise all of their rulings are suspect, exactly as they are suspect here.
 
The judicial input into the deportation of illegal aliens is messy. For while it is true that even illegal aliens have some basic due process rights (generally involving some form of adjudication in Immigration “Court”), those “courts” are NOT Article III courts. They are mere extensions of the Executive Branch.

From their adjudications, the aliens also have some appellate rights, in some instances.

Absent some deprivation of the rights granted to aliens (even illegal aliens), it is difficult to accept the determinations of so many of these low level district court judges which grant to themselves “jurisdiction” to entertain these absurd complaints from groups like the ACLU.

The United States (via our DOJ) is clearly in the right, at this point, in challenging these injunctions. The courts do need to get reined in.

That said, I’m not seeing these decisions as amounting to the kind of bad “behavior” warranting impeachment.

But SCOTUS had better start getting a bit proactive in taking the government’s appeals — and starting to make clear what is justiciable and what isn’t.
 
Just In!

It's going to be a tough row to hoe, getting this piece of shit impeached. democrats stick together and -- We all know why,

But still, this has got to be embarrassing. And then there's Doscovery.

Fun City!!


A House GOP lawmaker has filed impeachment articles against the federal judge who ordered the Trump administration to stop deportation flights being conducted under the Alien Enemies Act.

"For the past several weeks, we've seen several rogue activist judges try to impede the president from exercising, not only the mandate voters gave him, but his democratic and constitutional authority to keep the American people safe," Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, told Fox News Digital. "This is another example of a rogue judge overstepping his…authority."

Gill's resolution, first obtained by Fox News Digital, accused U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg of abusing his power in levying an emergency pause on the Trump administration's plans to deport illegal immigrants under a wartime authority first issued in 1798, which President Donald Trump recently invoked to get members of the criminal Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua out of the U.S
I find it interesting that Democrats went after Trump at least twice using laws from long ago and yet they claim that Trump can't use a law on the books from 1798.
 
Not at all. Since judges are required to be inherently politically neutral. It goes with the job. Otherwise all of their rulings are suspect, exactly as they are suspect here.
So you want to persecute judges who aren’t conservative?
 
Back
Top Bottom