Frankeneinstein
Gold Member
Diversity under attack.Impeach Clarence Thomas
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Diversity under attack.Impeach Clarence Thomas
There is also a democrat SCOTUS that has gotten gifts and money, I see you're silent on that one.
Guess you missed the BOMBSHELL report about two of the liberal justices scamming taxpayer money with bulk purchases of their books by public institutions in exchange for them showing up to give a speech. OH SNAP!!!This one is about SCOTUS judges taking private gifts like candy from people with cases before their court.
What the **** does any of that have to do with excusing anything?Guess you missed the BOMBSHELL report about two of the liberal justices scamming taxpayer money with bulk purchases of their books by public institutions in exchange for them showing up to give a speech. OH SNAP!!!
I destroyed your thread fool, try to keep up.What the **** does any of that have to do with excusing anything?
We have a justice who has been taking about as much in under the table gifts as he does in honest salary. You are good with that?
Want to say someone else is conducting their office corruptly? Ok sure, lets impeach any and all, but one does not make the other ok.
Diversity under attack.
hmm, attacking diversity, caught in the act, accuses others of lying about it...got "WHITE LIBERAL PRIVILEGE" written all over it.
![]()
- Reactions:AntonToo
I destroyed your thread fool, try to keep up
I thought Thomas didn't report gifts.Here is a list of gifts by total $:
![]()
One is very much not like the others.
But hey - you want to say that none of the justice should be recieving any gifts, no matter how small? Sure, that sounds good to me, but does not absolve the main perp here.

Of the most diverse court in history? could you be anymore liberal? anymore white? anymore privileged? ^this/that^ post is an undeniable attack on diversityOk sure, lets impeach any and all
dem/media lies are not facts, consider the source before making a fool of yourself.What the **** does any of that have to do with excusing anything?
We have a justice who has been taking about as much in under the table gifts as he does in honest salary. You are good with that?
Want to say someone else is conducting their office corruptly? Ok sure, lets impeach any and all, but one does not make the other ok.
Your food stamps won't buy a very good one.Oh shit!
Even Putin owns a "supreme court" justice?
We should all pool our money and buy one for ourselves.
Not with people with business before the court, you can't.Cant make friends when you become a judge. Ok boomer.
So you're good with democrats getting bribes?Here is a list of gifts by total $:
![]()
One is very much not like the others.
But hey - you want to say that none of the justice should be recieving any gifts, no matter how small? Sure, that sounds good to me, but does not absolve the main perp here.
It's coming, if Democrats win in November. It is certainly deserved. He's been taking bribes for 25 years. Now it looks like he's been blackmailed, too.
Judges are there because they are supposed to be impartial. How much of that have we seen?Not with people with business before the court, you can't.
It's coming, if Democrats win in November. It is certainly deserved. He's been taking bribes for 25 years. Now it looks like he's been blackmailed, too.
No dummy, I'm not good with anyone taking bribes.So you're good with democrats getting bribes?
Bullshit.No dummy, I'm not good with anyone taking bribes.