Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 64,173
- 27,136
- 2,173
He had to testify. It’s legally required to testify in court when called.By testifying on his behalf. He was a defense witness.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He had to testify. It’s legally required to testify in court when called.By testifying on his behalf. He was a defense witness.
Fox News contributor Andrew McCarthy, the chief prosecutor in Abdel Rahman’s criminal trial, said Hamawy’s testimony ultimately helped the government’s case despite it being offered to undermine the prosecution’s case.By testifying on his behalf. He was a defense witness.
Don't you remember?You could just drive into the garage of the world trade center with no problems no hassel ,no bomb check mirrors .Don't you? what happenedFox News contributor Andrew McCarthy, the chief prosecutor in Abdel Rahman’s criminal trial, said Hamawy’s testimony ultimately helped the government’s case despite it being offered to undermine the prosecution’s case.
No one accused him of knowing what he was doing. His intention was to help his religious leader. Then too, it's not like the democrat led media is credible.Fox News contributor Andrew McCarthy, the chief prosecutor in Abdel Rahman’s criminal trial, said Hamawy’s testimony ultimately helped the government’s case despite it being offered to undermine the prosecution’s case.
How did you determine what his intention was?No one accused him of knowing what he was doing. His intention was to help his religious leader. Then too, it's not like the democrat led media is credible.
Yes. And if he honestly felt that the shiekh had a right to blow up the World Trade Center, kill six people and injure hundreds, he has an obligation to be upfront and testify to that.He had to testify. It’s legally required to testify in court when called.
Because he testified for the defense. Or do you think that was accidental. His intention was to testify on behalf of this shiekh and he did.How did you determine what his intention was?
I guess you can travel through time and read minds.
He had an obligation to answer the questions asked of him, which didn’t (and couldn’t) include anything like what you suggested.Yes. And if he honestly felt that the shiekh had a right to blow up the World Trade Center, kill six people and injure hundreds, he has an obligation to be upfront and testify to that.
Again, he was legally required to testify when called. It wasn’t about intent, it was about what he’s required to do.Because he testified for the defense. Or do you think that was accidental. His intention was to testify on behalf of this shiekh and he did.
He was not chosen out of a cast of thousands. He was not required to testify for the defense out of the blue. He was identified as being a defense witness and then subpoenaed. It would have been adorable if he had been called by the defense and then trashed their case. But lawyers generally know what witnesses are going to say before they take the stand. This is an Al Quaeda terrorist whose spiritual leader is a terrorist.Again, he was legally required to testify when called. It wasn’t about intent, it was about what he’s required to do.
And as stated, his testimony helped the prosecution.
And yet, according to the prosecutor he harmed the defense.He was not chosen out of a cast of thousands. He was not required to testify for the defense out of the blue. He was identified as being a defense witness and then subpoenaed. It would have been adorable if he had been called by the defense and then trashed their case. But lawyers generally know what witnesses are going to say before they take the stand. This is an Al Quaeda terrorist whose spiritual leader is a terrorist.
He was asked to testify about his support for this shiekhAnd yet, according to the prosecutor he harmed the defense.
All these opinions and you have absolutely no idea what he was asked to testify about.
Nope. He wasn’t on trial so that’s not relevant.He was asked to testify about his support for this shiekh
You are just making shit up to smear an American hero.And now you’re just denying reality.
Hegseth admitted to putting the info on Signal.
Go be delusional and ignorant somewhere else.
I accept your surrender.You are just making shit up to smear an American hero.
What a POS you are.
He's a terrorist supporting muslim. No doubt, no argument.Nope. He wasn’t on trial so that’s not relevant.
You don’t know what he was asked or what he said on the stand.
You’re just making shit up.
There’s no arguing with you since you are so extremely prejudiced against Muslims that you want to arrest all of them.He's a terrorist supporting muslim. No doubt, no argument.
At least you are just lying about me, and not a decorated war hero.I accept your surrender.
He gets thanks from Islamic terrorists and Islamic terrorist Pom Pom flailers like you.He saved the lives of hundreds of US service members.
And this is the thanks he gets.