I do, because you seem to be defending the "culture war". I guess it's just "different" when your side does it.Do you mean the power to demand calling a male person a “she” ?
No of course not
Do you even have to ask?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I do, because you seem to be defending the "culture war". I guess it's just "different" when your side does it.Do you mean the power to demand calling a male person a “she” ?
No of course not
Do you even have to ask?
Of course I am defending my cultural beliefsI do, because you seem to be defending the "culture war". I guess it's just "different" when your side does it.
I'm sure that's how you'd characterize my position on the issue. I'm for all kinds of things you'd oppose. Byt that's not the point. I don't want to force my values on you via the government. You, apparently, do. You're a culture warrior. I'm not.Of course I am defending my cultural beliefs
Are you for open borders?
There can be no compromise between open borders on your side and zero illegal migration on your sideI'm sure that's how you'd characterize my position on the issue. I'm for all kinds of things you'd oppose. Byt that's not the point. I don't want to force my values on you via the culture. You, apparently, do. You're a culture warrior. I'm not.
Reading comprehension is hard. But if you try again, you might see that I specifically said that I did NOT want to force that on everyone else with the government. OK?There can be no compromise between open borders on your side and zero illegal migration on your side
Unfortunately large swaths of libdom WANT open bordersReading comprehension is hard. But if you try again, you might see that I specifically said that I did NOT want to force that on everyone else with the government. OK?
As I said, I do. But I don't believe in forcing broad social change via the government. So, even if were President, I wouldn't advocate for such changes. Unless there was serious change in public sentiment on the matter. Unless there was real consensus.Unfortunately large swaths of libdom WANT open borders
As long as there is significant diasgreement on the matter, neither "side" will win. It will just be a lot of thrashing back and forth. That's the problem with your culture war. It's simply each "side" trying to bully the other (when they are in power).In the end one side will have to win and the other side lose that cultural battle
As far as I’m concerned battling libs to a draw is better than letting them winAs I said, I do. But I don't believe in forcing broad social change via the government. So, even if were President, I wouldn't advocate for such changes. Unless there was serious change in public sentiment on the matter. Unless there was real consensus.
As long as there is significant diasgreement on the matter, neither "side" will win. It will just be a lot of thrashing back and forth. That's the problem with your culture war. It's simply each "side" trying to bully the other (when they are in power).
If you want to live in a free country, live and let live is the only thing that works.
I say that's not the choice. Trying to pass laws that force change on society, when there isn't widespread consensus on the matter, is bad government, regardless of which "side" is driving.As far as I’m concerned battling libs to a draw is better than letting them win
What say you?
FYI- not true!I don't give a flying four letter word what you are. Do you think India's, Brazil's, Germany, Canada's, Denmark's and Sweden's voting requirements are "fascist"? And why would the US be "fascist" for having the same requirements to vote?
You really seem confused.![]()
Which ones were not investigated?Not exactly, most claims were never investigated. That IS the fact.
The question is, why didn't PA vet the application for citizenship? They had to vet the applicant for possibly being disqualified for the age minimum, for whether they live in the district they are registering in, and vet as to whether they are on any FELON list....why wouldn't the voter registrar vet applicants for citizenship?![]()
ICE Arrests Criminal Illegal Alien who Voted in Seven Federal Elections Since 2008 | Homeland Security
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), in partnership with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), arrested Mahady Sacko, a criminal illegal alien from Mauritania, charged for voter fraud in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.www.dhs.gov
There is no election fraud!
This is EXACTLY why Lefties brought in 20 million illegals.
Also, why didnt this person obtain citizenship? They just lived illegally for 20 years?!
One of you MB COMMIES could have sponsored them for citizenship.
How many haven't they caught?You found one! Good for you. You're not batshit after all.
Or, well.... You got one, anyways.
He falsely certified he was a US citizen per 6KFDM News.The question is, why didn't PA vet the application for citizenship? They had to vet the applicant for possibly being disqualified for the age minimum, for whether they live in the district they are registering in, and vet as to whether they are on any FELON list....why wouldn't the voter registrar vet applicants for citizenship?
Yes, he signed his registration....claiming citizenship.He falsely certified he was a US citizen per 6KFDM News.
Looks like the system failed doesn't it?Yes, he signed his registration....claiming citizenship.
That does not stop the registrar office from vetting the voter registration application for citizenship, or for being a disqualified felon, or for being underage, or for etc.etc etc....
As we saw in 2000, a presidential election can swing one way or the other on just a few hundred votes, and that's the big dog, the one everyone wants. Get down below the state level and you don't need many fraudulent votes at all. IOW, there doesn't have to be millions of illegal voters to cause problems and saddle us with democrats that should not be in office.Excellent. We got one! Where are the other millions of illegal voters y'all claim exists!?
Funny how FBI has recently seized voting information in Jaw Ja and AZ.That was honestly the nail in the coffin of the "they cheated!" excuse, from my perspective. They spent four years fixated on digging up proof if their hysterical fantasy and came up with nothing. Nothing. They disproved it themselves.
Has there ever been a coordinate conspiracy with illegal immigrants and the Democratic Party using illegal immigrants to vote for Democrats in mass in any election for the last 30 -50 years of Republicans claiming this....? Nope!As we saw in 2000, a presidential election can swing one way or the other on just a few hundred votes, and that's the big dog, the one everyone wants. Get down below the state level and you don't need many fraudulent votes at all. IOW, there doesn't have to be millions of illegal voters to cause problems and saddle us with democrats that should not be in office.