catatomic
Gold Member
- Nov 28, 2012
- 1,053
- 304
- 198
No. Don't most Americans live in housing?So you are the average American with the average American carbon footprint.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No. Don't most Americans live in housing?So you are the average American with the average American carbon footprint.
Yes, do you live in a tent?No. Don't most Americans live in housing?
It's pretty low. I'm sure.
It's hard to look at my bill because I am in subsidized housing.... but you're not smart enough to look on your bill to find out? ...
VERY lame for someone with a Master Degree in Differential Equations ... seems like you wouldn't know what to do with a ∂t even if it bit you in the ass ...
I live in a small apartment.Yes, do you live in a tent?
There's not a lot of uncertainty about today's models.
The level of the ocean has risen perhaps a few millimeters in the last 100 years at best. Florida is sinking because it is made of sand.
That is measured by satellites who would have to know their exact altitude over the ocean in a constantly decaying orbit. A whole lot of math would have to go into these calculations and is extremely prone to error.Tracking 30 Years of Sea Level Rise
Global mean sea level has risen 101 millimeters (3.98 inches) since 1992, and it continues to do so at 3.9 mm (0.15 inches) per year.earthobservatory.nasa.gov
1. Write the conclusion you want.Why?
Yes, lucky us! The economies of the Western world will be destroyed because morons support everything they're told to support.If true, lucky for us. Big oil has a lot of muscle though.
Science. Obviously you don't recognize it.What are you talking about?
It's hard to look at my bill because I am in subsidized housing.
That is measured by satellites who would have to know their exact altitude over the ocean in a constantly decaying orbit. A whole lot of math would have to go into these calculations and is extremely prone to error.
I've read hundreds of papers. That just isn't so.1. Write the conclusion you want.
2. Cherry-pick, distort, and invent data that support your conclusion.
3. Shout that the science is settled.
4. Cash the grant money checks.
Because it's not science, that's why.
It always saves money to consume lessYes, lucky us! The economies of the Western world will be destroyed because morons support everything they're told to support.
You should make that a plank of your platform. "You have too much money! You don't need a house! Have you ever considered living in a yurt?"
Why you got to treat me like I'm stupid?Science. Obviously you don't recognize it.
I'm sure my footprint is low.Too stupid to go out and look on your meter? ... the electric company posts their rates on the internet ...
Hypocrite ... burning coal to tell us the evils of burning coal ... [sniff] ... my hydro-electricity makes bouillabaisse ... never claimed otherwise ...
The models are plugged in from 1880 and it is a problem.Here's a scientific paper with an extended error management discussion ... some things they do correct for, and these corrections are described ... other they don't ...
The main (uncorrected) error is too little data ... 25 years is just weather, not climate ... the other big one is altimeter decay, scientific instruments have to be calibrated on a regular basis, like every year, but this is near impossible in Low Earth Orbit ...
The math says less than 2 feet rise by Year 2100 ... which is nothing ... doesn't effect Miami International Airport ... one man with one shovel can protect the entirety of Houston, Texas ... easy ... like "minimum wage" easy ...
There's not a lot of uncertainty about today's models.