If you still believe in deadly climate change, this will help you sleep.

[Sunsettommy]

I've given it before. Why do it again? You'd just cry, lie and run again.

I grow weary of that cycle. I educate those willing to learn for free. You're a cult clown, so you get treated like one. The fact that it triggers you is a bonus.

Who do you think you're impressing now with the hysterics? Don't delude yourself into thinking you've got an audience. It's just these few people here, my pout-stalker clique crying their little cult eyes out at me.

Now you are just plain LYING as you have been asked many times in this thread back up YOUR words from post 351:

The opposite of reality, of course. Follow the money. All of the corrupting bribe money flows to the deniers.

Any ethical scientist could triple their salary by choosing to lie for the deniers. They don't. They effectively take a pay cut by refusing denier bribes, which gives them even more credibility.

I persist because I am destroying you exposing your inability for mature discussion, your inability to talk the science and that you post a lot of wordy insulting smoke to hide your science ignorance.

 

[mamooth]

Now you are just plain LYING as you have been asked many times in this thread back up YOUR words from post 351:

And I refused. What are you going to do about? Cry harder? Ooh, scary.

I don't argue with flat earthers either. You're literally in the same category. It's not my fault that you cratered your credibility.

Oh, I see you neglected the post where I mentioned Happer taking the moolah. I'll let that pass though, as you're probably too hysterical to even read my posts now.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Let me highlight what made you soil yourself and run there.

You claimed that solar effects and ocean effects explained the warming.

I pointed out that TSI has gone down, and oceans have warmed strongly, which debunks your crazy claim.

So you ran, like you do every time.


And I accepted that. Sweet Jeebus, even for a denier, you're stupid and dishonest.

I pointed out that your claim, that 2.8 W/m^2 couldn't cause warming, that claim was stupid. Because it was. If that much extra energy is being absorbed, the earth has to warm. Energy just doesn't vanish.

How are you going to run this time? That's really the only interesting thing about talking to you, guessing what tactic you'll use to run this time.

See you don't realize how SMALL 3.8 W m/2 really is against the total downwelling radiation flow. Here is a chart showing how negligible the change is over many decades of time. From 1880 to around 2090?

This is why you ignorant science illiterates fail.

 

[Sunsettommy]

And I refused. What are you going to do about? Cry harder? Ooh, scary.

I don't argue with flat earthers either. You're literally in the same category. It's not my fault that you cratered your credibility.

Oh, I see you neglected the post where I mentioned Happer taking the moolah. I'll let that pass though, as you're probably too hysterical to even read my posts now.

Then you failed to back your assertion at post 351.

Thank you.

Meanwhile all you have is smoke screen of anger, hate and ignorance to hide which is why you fail so epically.

 

[Robert W]

I pointed out where he was wrong in several spots.

That is, you're just lying about my posts now. I've taken your measure, and found you to be craven and dishonest.

If it makes you feel better, feel free to cry about how meeeeeeaaaaaaaan I was for highlighting your cowardly sleaze. It's not like you've ever been capable of any other tactic.

One word describes you. FAKE!!!

 

[Robert W]

Again, your argument-from-authority fallacy that fails in multiple ways.

You can't just say someone is great. You have to show it.

And you can't. You never even try. All you do is cry about how mean people are when they demonstrate your arguments are bad.

You live like a rainbow. Fades in and fades out. Talks all the time about nothing at all.

 

[Robert W]

Then you failed to back your assertion at post 351.

Thank you.

Meanwhile all you have is smoke screen of anger, hate and ignorance to hide which is why you fail so epically.

Ok, we have to face facts about him. He is like the huge mouth African BullFrog making stupid claims and taking way too long to catch his prey. In short I am ending talking to him. He has delusions of grandeur.

 

[ReinyDays]

I don't do physics ...

We've noticed ...

Field theory is "simple math"? ...

 

[Robert W]

I pointed out where he was wrong in several spots.

That is, you're just lying about my posts now. I've taken your measure, and found you to be craven and dishonest.

If it makes you feel better, feel free to cry about how meeeeeeaaaaaaaan I was for highlighting your cowardly sleaze. It's not like you've ever been capable of any other tactic.

You appear to have no fan base on this topic. Don't you see your problem?

 

[Sunsettommy]

We've noticed ...

Field theory is "simple math"? ...

When you have many hundreds of scientists and well-educated people doing physics covering a lot of grounds that have been repeatedly brought up and posted, it was saturated grounds to stay away also that most people in society wouldn't understand physics based explanations anyway, while YOUR snobbery diminishes you by making posts as you do gets people to consider YOU less reliable than first thought because of your snobbery turns people off.

The simple math is actually sufficient to destroy the main IPCC argument, too bad that was hard for YOU to handle that a simple argument was apparently beneath your snobbish nature, I tire of your holier than thou bullshit back to ignore you go jerk!

 

[Sunsettommy]

You appear to have no fan base on this topic. Don't you see your problem?

He doesn't in other forums either because he is so unpleasant.

 

[mamooth]

You appear to have no fan base on this topic. Don't you see your problem?

You just illustrated yours. We think this is about science. You think it's about gathering a playground gang to bully people. You mind works in ugly and violent ways.

Sadly for you wannabee thugs, you haven't gathered nearly enough jackals to threaten the lion. You've only got, like, 3 or 4. You'll need at least 20 to successfully dogpile a lion. Until you can gather that many, the lion will keep swatting you away.

 

[mamooth]

The simple math is actually sufficient to destroy the main IPCC argument,

Then why have you never been able to present that math?

Remember, you're not talking to your fellow cult imbeciles. You're talking to liberals, the evidence-based community. Your usual tactic of declaring victory and running won't work on us.

 

[Robert W]

You just illustrated yours. We think this is about science. You think it's about gathering a playground gang to bully people. You mind works in ugly and violent ways.

Sadly for you wannabee thugs, you haven't gathered nearly enough jackals to threaten the lion. You've only got, like, 3 or 4. You'll need at least 20 to successfully dogpile a lion. Until you can gather that many, the lion will keep swatting you away.

Nope, you still don't see your problem.

 

[Robert W]

Remember, you're not talking to your fellow cult imbeciles. You're talking to liberals, the evidence-based community. Your usual tactic of declaring victory and running won't work on us.

You are not remotely a liberal. You are a card carrying Democrat.

 

[Robert W]

He doesn't in other forums either because he is so unpleasant.

In a word, I believe he is psychotic.

 

[catatomic]

It's not real science if the conclusion is predetermined.

Why?

 

[catatomic]

There is far more money available on the pro-AGW side than there ever has been on the anti side.

If true, lucky for us. Big oil has a lot of muscle though.

 

[catatomic]

Go look at your electricity bill and tell me how much you pay for it ... SDG&E has some of the highest electric costs in the nation ...

But if you live in Idaho, I'll apologize ...

It's pretty low. I'm sure.

 

[catatomic]

You don't care about the empirical climate evidence of the geologic record? You do realize the ice age began ~3 million years ago, right?

What are you talking about?