Concerned American
Diamond Member
If ANYONE is too stupid to vote, they are too stupid to make an informed decision and yeah, I'm fine with that too.If Republicans are too stupid to vote, I'm fine with that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If ANYONE is too stupid to vote, they are too stupid to make an informed decision and yeah, I'm fine with that too.If Republicans are too stupid to vote, I'm fine with that.
If you say so. I am too tired to argue now. I will look at tomorrowI have. I gave you the link to the bill
No idea what you are talking about zinc. There is nothing in there about the Feds reviewing registrations lists. Can you give us a cite to the section you think contains this review?
It wasn't a counter claim. It was a statement of fact that didn't target any of your claims.And you made a factual counter claim you have yet to substantiate.
Ah. The one where 58% want mail in voting and 58% want same day registration.No. See my post to Alicia.
That's its beauty. MAGAts can pretend it's not doing what it's intended to do.Not one citizen will be denied their right to vote under the SAVE Act.
Not a single one.
Are you going to lie and say people will be denied their vote?That's its beauty. MAGAts can pretend it's not doing what it's intended to do.
But since you know that was a lie, I'll go ahead and kindly squash it:Under the SAVE ACT the Trump Fed could unilaterally declare that all registered independents failed their system test and kick them off voter lists three days before the election, without recourse.
Sorry. Thems the breaks, Moonglow.I myself am getting tired of proving who I am year after year to vote.
It's the citizenship part of the bill, isn't it?Are you going to lie and say people will be denied their vote?
Show up, show an ID, vote.
So simple that even you can do it.
The documents required to vote under this bill would seem to take much the same effort to acquire as the documents needed to acquire a passport.Are you going to lie and say people will be denied their vote?
Show up, show an ID, vote.
So simple that even you can do it.
Nah, it's the dog whistling part.It's the citizenship part of the bill, isn't it?
Any new restrictions will disenfranchise some voters.
And until the right wing liars prove that in-person voting fraud is actually a significant problem, it's not worth possibly disenfrachising even one single voter.
So you can toss out all of your pre-programmed talking points, because it just boils down to this.
And especially given the recent lies of the right wingers, not a single inch should be given to them on this, until the paid liars who fooled the gullible right wingers about election fraud publicly apologize and admit they lied.
Nothing wrong with either if sufficient safeguards are put in place. But you don't want those, do you?Ah. The one where 58% want mail in voting and 58% want same day registration.
Oh no. We can't do what India, a country three times our size, can do? Require voter ID?The documents required to vote under this bill would seem to take much the same effort to acquire as the documents needed to acquire a passport.
You can pretend that's not a hindrance to sectors of the population, especially those more likely to vote Democratic Party, that's the shtick after all.
Lol.fact that didn't target any of your claims.
So it’s 88% accurate. Easy to fix, show up on voting with your ID and do a provisional.In tests of the system, error rates are hovering at 12-14%. Meaning, 12% of the viters identified as ineligible are actually eligible.
Republicans dont care. That's a BONUS, as far as they are concerned. The entire point is to reduce turnout, which they believe favors the GOP. So this is like gravy, to them.
Oy vey! You disappoint me!If you say so. I am too tired to argue now. I will look at tomorrow
You claim that requiring voter ID will "disenfranchise" some voters:Any new restrictions will disenfranchise some voters.
And until the right wing liars prove that in-person voting fraud is actually a significant problem, it's not worth possibly disenfrachising even one single voter.
So you can toss out all of your pre-programmed talking points, because it just boils down to this.
And especially given the recent lies of the right wingers, not a single inch should be given to them on this, until the paid liars who fooled the gullible right wingers about election fraud publicly apologize and admit they lied.
It's the Constitutionality of the Bill.It's the citizenship part of the bill, isn't it?