if you approve of Trump

The problem here is that you want to cherry pick a few events and them apply them to Trump. Pathetic. You ignore or even support some conquests as long as they wouldn't be applied in the same conversation. How disingenuous of you.
keep twisting, lemming.

 
It's an honest ascertainment of what you posted. It doesn't surprise me you can't provide a rebuttal
Ascertainment is a big word for you!

Anyway, if so many people in the country actually suffer from this debilitating mental illness, what do you propose to do about it? I mean, you're saying it's a real thing, right? What should be done, in your view. Or would you rather not talk about it?
 
Ascertainment is a big word for you!

Anyway, if so many people in the country actually suffer from this debilitating mental illness, what do you propose to do about it? I mean, you're saying it's a real thing, right? What should be done, in your view. Or would you rather not talk about it?
Anyway, if so many people in the country actually suffer from this debilitating mental illness, what do you propose to do about it? I mean, you're saying it's a real thing, right? What should be done, in your view. Or would you rather not talk about it?
Luckily you are in the minority so I don't have to worry about it.
Ascertainment is a big word for you!
Do you even know what it means? Why are you so pusillanimous?
 
Luckily you are in the minority so I don't have to worry about it.

Do you even know what it means? Why are you so pusillanimous?
Still no answer. I'm calling bullshit. If you thought TDS was a real form of mental illness, you'd be trying to put these people away, or at least prevent them from voting.

You big faker!
 
keep twisting, lemming.


I twist nothing, conquest is conquest, the one twisting things is you. By cherry picking some events while ignoring thousands of other events is simply disingenuous because you have no legitimate point, just more silly whining.
 
I twist nothing, conquest is conquest, the one twisting things is you. By cherry picking some events while ignoring thousands of other events is simply disingenuous because you have no legitimate point, just more silly whining.
when you compare Lincoln taking on the confederacy with Putin and the Ukraine; Hitler and France; and Saddam invading Kuwait, it makes me wonder what level of schooling you got.

(did your high school have teeter-totters on the playground?)
 
Trump wasn't a good option to be our president, but he was sure as hell better than the alternative. Clinton, Biden, or Harris? Please.
 
when you compare Lincoln taking on the confederacy with Putin and the Ukraine; Hitler and France; and Saddam invading Kuwait, it makes me wonder what level of schooling you got.

(did your high school have teeter-totters on the playground?)
Much better schooling than you. You are applying silly emotional attachments to events, with no regard to the reality of those events and where they fit in the historic record simply because they fit your pathetic narrative. How sad.
 
Still no answer. I'm calling bullshit. If you thought TDS was a real form of mental illness, you'd be trying to put these people away, or at least prevent them from voting.

You big faker!
Luckily you can receive help for your condition now that it's been declared a mental illness
 
Trump wasn't a good option to be our president, but he was sure as hell better than the alternative. Clinton, Biden, or Harris? Please.
no, he wasn't

nor were the others.

the last GOOD option was McCain.

but the NEW GOP didn't like him, so they didn't vote for him, and he lost, and we ended up with Obama.
 
Much better schooling than you. You are applying silly emotional attachments to events, with no regard to the reality of those events and where they fit in the historic record simply because they fit your pathetic narrative. How sad.
Lincoln was trying to reunite his country, the others mentioned were only out for conquest.

shame you can't see the difference.
 
no, he wasn't

nor were the others.

the last GOOD option was McCain.

but the NEW GOP didn't like him, so they didn't vote for him, and he lost, and we ended up with Obama.
McCain? Wow. That's probably the worst Republican pick in over a 100 years.
 
Trump wasn't a good option to be our president, but he was sure as hell better than the alternative.
2178.jpg
 
Lincoln was trying to reunite his country, the others mentioned were only out for conquest.

shame you can't see the difference.
Isn't Putin trying to reunite his country? Does the excuse matter? Not really, only the result. In the case of Lincoln, the states lawfully left the US, taking it back by force was conquest. Attempting to apply separate values to the event does not change reality. It might make you feel better, but history never cared about your feelings.
 
McCain? Wow. That's probably the worst Republican pick in over a 100 years.
no, that would be trump, but then, the people that elected him weren't real Republicans, (except In Name Only).

McCain was the last 'Republican' to run.

if it weren't for the kool-aid, you'd know that
 
no, that would be trump, but then, the people that elected him weren't real Republicans, (except In Name Only).

McCain was the last 'Republican' to run.

if it weren't for the kool-aid, you'd know that
McCain was hardly a real Republican. He was the worst RINO around. He was a terrorist loving warmongering scumbag. He would have dragged the party down to where Democrats are now had he somehow won.
 
15th post
McCain was hardly a real Republican. He was the worst RINO around. He was a terrorist loving warmongering scumbag. He would have dragged the party down to where Democrats are now had he somehow won.
notice the red hats?

 
no, that would be trump, but then, the people that elected him weren't real Republicans, (except In Name Only).

McCain was the last 'Republican' to run.

if it weren't for the kool-aid, you'd know that

McCain along with Collins and Murkowski voted against the repeal of the ACA. He was more interested in his image as a maverick than he was as a conservative. We shoulda got rid of that piece of shit legislation back in 2017, and he is partly responsible that it didn't happen.
 
Probably not gonna happen and if the US does takeover over by force, the next Democrat president will return Greenland. Trump knows this. Denmark, on the other hand said it's military is authorized to shoot first, ask later. Question is, does Denmark really want to challenge the US? Any military takeover will end NATO, troops out of Germany, and dissolution of the UN.
And trade with Europe.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom