If Trump really wants to help keep people from being so angry I have some suggestions.

Was obstruction charged? yes or no? ANS: NO there was no obstruction or it would have been charged, dumbass.
Perhaps you aren't aware of Mueller's determination he could not indict Trump for obstruction, despite the overwhelming evidence supporting the charge, because of the OLC prohibition against indicting a sitting prez.
Here is some of the plentiful evidence.

 
1. Apologize to the nation for causing much of the vitriol and division we are experiencing.
2. Concede the election and acknowledge there was no widespread voter fraud. That Stop the Steal was predicated on a lie.
3. Admit he and a number of co-conspirators plotted to allow him retain power by overturning the election results. Specifically apologize to Mike Pence for putting his life in jeopardy.
4. Acknowledge he did not have the legal authority to take classified material from the WH.
5. Tell his followers to stop making threats of violence against law enforcement agencies.
6. Announce he will never again seek public office and is withdrawing from public life.
7. Set up a fund to provide financial help for those whose live's he has ruined by duping them in to participating in the 1/6 riot.
8. Ask for forgiveness from all the ethnic, religious, and racial groups he insulted.

Maybe then we can move on and address the problems we need to solve as a more united nation with a common purpose.

:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 
Perhaps you aren't aware of Mueller's determination he could not indict Trump for obstruction, despite the overwhelming evidence supporting the charge, because of the OLC prohibition against indicting a sitting prez.
Here is some of the plentiful evidence.

That senile bastard Mueller did not even know what day it was when he testified.
 
That senile bastard Mueller did not even know what day it was when he testified.
Attempting to question Mueller's competence in no way compromises the evidence of Trump's obstruction revealed in Mueller's report. Like this...........

I. Order to McGahn to deny Trump’s order to fire Mueller

Obstructive act (p. 118): This effort “would qualify as an obstructive act if it had the natural tendency to constrain McGahn from testifying truthfully or to undermine his credibility as a potential witness[.]” There is “some evidence” that Trump genuinely believed press reports that he had ordered McGahn to fire Mueller were wrong. However, “[o]ther evidence cuts against that understanding of the president’s conduct”—and the special counsel lists a great deal more evidence on this latter point.

Nexus (p. 119): At this point “the Special Counsel’s use of a grand jury had been further confirmed by the return of several indictments.” Mueller’s office had indicated to Trump’s lawyers that it was investigating obstruction, and Trump knew that McGahn had already been interviewed by Mueller on the topic. “That evidence indicates the President’s awareness” that his efforts to fire Mueller were relevant to official proceedings. Trump “likely contemplated the ongoing investigation and any proceedings arising from it” in directing McGahn to create a false record of the earlier interaction.

Intent (p. 120): “Substantial evidence indicates that … the President acted for the purpose of influencing McGahn’s account in order to deflect or prevent further scrutiny” of Trump.
 
Perhaps you aren't aware of Mueller's determination he could not indict Trump for obstruction, despite the overwhelming evidence supporting the charge, because of the OLC prohibition against indicting a sitting prez.
Here is some of the plentiful evidence
Why are we discussing ancient history?
Trump did not commit obstruction and was not indicted for obstruction, Period.

Now we can look at the evidence in Hunter's laptop and the sworn testimony of the whistleblower (Bobulinsky) and get a new special prosecutor to investigate the Xiden Crime Family and their cash cows.

Throwing smoke grenades is NOT going to help democrats in November or in 2024.
 
Perhaps you aren't aware of Mueller's determination he could not indict Trump for obstruction, despite the overwhelming evidence supporting the charge, because of the OLC prohibition against indicting a sitting prez.
Here is some of the plentiful evidence.

Your link is biased and the article is an OPed making presumptions.
 

Forum List

Back
Top