- Apr 5, 2010
- 80,603
- 32,550
- 2,300
No it wasn't.
Read the report. He committed fraud often and continuously.
No, he didn't.
The collateral value was mutually agreed upon, and the value never came into play anyway, because he paid the loans back.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No it wasn't.
Read the report. He committed fraud often and continuously.
Thanks. From your link.Even the Trump hating AP had to admit it.
Key points from AP analysis of Trump's New York civil fraud case
Within days, Donald Trump could potentially have his sprawling real estate business empire ordered “dissolved” for repeated misrepresentations on financial statements to lenders, adding him to a short list of scam marketers, con artists and others who have been hit with the ultimate punishment for vapnews.com
What if he didn't pay the loans back?No, he didn't.
The collateral value was mutually agreed upon, and the value never came into play anyway, because he paid the loans back.
I'm sure.you think so.it was a show trial, nothing more or less.
They went to a law only used after conviction or civil judgement for fraud.
The appeals courts will have a field day.
What if he didn't pay the loans back?
I'm sure.you think so.
We will see how you react to their decision.
Incentive to stop fraud isn't convolated.Talk about convoluted reasoning.
Also,
How do you know?
Nope. He got better interest rates because the bank wanted his business and cut him a deal. They knew fully well the value of his properties. They made $100 million and wanted to do future loans. last thing they wanted was a lawsuit brought by the state government on a matter between two parties, in which everyone was happy.Yes their was. Trump got way better interest rates and loans because of his lies.
It shows Trump broke the law and evidently Trump supporters believe Trump is above the law.
I think the lower court’s judgement will be overturned, with either the fine being reduced to $0 or to a small amount.How do you feel Trump's appeal will go?
Incentive to stop fraud isn't convolated.
Never been a case like this before. Selective prosecution for the purpose of election interference, and it will be tossed by the SCOTUS.The law was used because that is the law Trump broke.
Not sure how you think this helps you.Thanks. From your link.
There may be more dissolved companies than AP found. Legal experts caution that some 63(12) cases never show up in legal databases because they were settled, dropped or otherwise not reported.
Still, the only case the AP found of a business dissolved under the anti-fraud law without citing actual victims or losses was a relatively small company closed in 1972 for writing term papers for college students. In that case, the attorney general said the victim was the “integrity of the educational process.”
THEN the bank could sue for non-payment, because they would have damages.What if he didn't pay the loans back?
This the way it works here too.In every state or county that I have owned property in, the tax assessor's office did their own valuations to determine the taxable value of property. If you thought they were wrong you could dispute it. I never got a letter asking me what the tax value of my property was, I was always told.
Not sure if you are daydreaming... lol.Imagine the ads Trump can run, "I lost my property to stand up for you. While those who haven't created a job in their lives looked to destroy me for political gain".
Over 22000 people employed and will be newly unemployed so that a radical New York "Attorney General" can apply some Stalinist tactics in a state that will be quickly losing their billionaires.
Regardless of the Marxists on this and other sites for whom history is a subject they avoided in school, this is about as UnAmerican as it gets.
View attachment 922105
Never been a case like this before. Selective prosecution for the purpose of election interference, and it will be tossed by the SCOTUS.
It may be overruled at the State level. The appeals court has to know this is an abomination of law.
My concern is that the state is blue, and full of leftists. My hope is that they will overrule anyway because they know it would look bad for them to be overruled by SCOTUS.It may be overruled at the State level. The appeals court has to know this is an abomination of law.
Exactly.It's worse than that, the banks didn't loan on Trump's valuation, they did their own and lent on that valuation.xay.
Do they? Frankly, the courts have been watching Trump pull crap like this for years, maybe they are just getting tired of covering for him.