SuperDemocrat
Gold Member
- Mar 4, 2015
- 8,200
- 869
- 275
- Banned
- #81
Trump philosophy is think big so he may just fire him in order to make a bigger controversy. I believe the man has no fear and is willing to risk it all.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
well DAMNIT !
already a thread on this.
AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHHHH.
No, no conflict of interest exists.Because of Mullers close ties to Comey he should withdraw as Special Counsel. There's a clear conflict of interest, unless Comey is not to be involved at all and that door has already closed..
No, no conflict of interest exists.Because of Mullers close ties to Comey he should withdraw as Special Counsel. There's a clear conflict of interest, unless Comey is not to be involved at all and that door has already closed..
No, no conflict of interest exists.Because of Mullers close ties to Comey he should withdraw as Special Counsel. There's a clear conflict of interest, unless Comey is not to be involved at all and that door has already closed..
Really, Comey was Mullers direct supervisor 2003-2005. So one or the other can't be involved. Which will it be?
.
Twelve years ago? Trump was Comey's and now Muller's supervisor if you want me to be as silly as you. No court would uphold your logic.No, no conflict of interest exists.Because of Mullers close ties to Comey he should withdraw as Special Counsel. There's a clear conflict of interest, unless Comey is not to be involved at all and that door has already closed..
Really, Comey was Mullers direct supervisor 2003-2005. So one or the other can't be involved. Which will it be?.
No, no conflict of interest exists.Because of Mullers close ties to Comey he should withdraw as Special Counsel. There's a clear conflict of interest, unless Comey is not to be involved at all and that door has already closed..
Really, Comey was Mullers direct supervisor 2003-2005. So one or the other can't be involved. Which will it be?
.
Well, Comey has been fired so it will likely be he who is not investigating. Do try to keep up.
Twelve years ago? Trump was Comey's and now Muller's supervisor if you want me to be as silly as you. No court would uphold your logic.No, no conflict of interest exists.Because of Mullers close ties to Comey he should withdraw as Special Counsel. There's a clear conflict of interest, unless Comey is not to be involved at all and that door has already closed..
Really, Comey was Mullers direct supervisor 2003-2005. So one or the other can't be involved. Which will it be?.
Meanwhile, Trump's not lowering taxes.I'm fed up with watching Democrats and their collusive media humping dry holes in public, time for their bullshit to stop, Mueller should go and working class Americans should be represented and their taxes not wasted on squat and hate speech..
Only if Trump refunds the government his Florida golfing expenses and what it costs to keep his wife and kid in a different state.![]()
Do you really want to review the wasted taxes and doubling of the national debt during the Obama years... were talking Trillions here...![]()
Mueller was picked, and he accepted, despite his connections to Comey. And now, he's ramping up his team. Mueller's going nowhere unless Trump fires him.No, no conflict of interest exists.Because of Mullers close ties to Comey he should withdraw as Special Counsel. There's a clear conflict of interest, unless Comey is not to be involved at all and that door has already closed..
Really, Comey was Mullers direct supervisor 2003-2005. So one or the other can't be involved. Which will it be?
.
Well, Comey has been fired so it will likely be he who is not investigating. Do try to keep up.
You might want to keep up with the law and conflicts of interest.
.
Friend says Trump is considering 'terminating' Mueller
I can predict the responses:
"Well, he's the president! He has that power!"
"There's nothing to investigate anyway!"
Right Trumpsters just think they know everything there is to know about the case.
1) How about Trump just let the investigation vindicate him if he has done no wrong doing?
2) Why aren't ANY congressional republicans backing him up on this?
The people that are into politics know that Mueller is a partisan dickhead and a good buddy of Comey. A member in good standing of The Swamp.
However, Heartland America doesn't give a shit because they are too busy making a living so that the asshole Liberals in government can take their money and give it away to the welfare queens.
Friend says Trump is considering 'terminating' Mueller
I can predict the responses:
"Well, he's the president! He has that power!"
"There's nothing to investigate anyway!"
Right Trumpsters just think they know everything there is to know about the case.
1) How about Trump just let the investigation vindicate him if he has done no wrong doing?
2) Why aren't ANY congressional republicans backing him up on this?
As always, you rightards are woefully uninformed. Mueller is a registered Republican and was appointed director of the FBI by republican president.Friend says Trump is considering 'terminating' Mueller
I can predict the responses:
"Well, he's the president! He has that power!"
"There's nothing to investigate anyway!"
Right Trumpsters just think they know everything there is to know about the case.
1) How about Trump just let the investigation vindicate him if he has done no wrong doing?
2) Why aren't ANY congressional republicans backing him up on this?
Mueller is a Democrat hack appointed by an Obozo leftover and he's stacking his staff with leftist donors. Of course he should be fired!
Friend says Trump is considering 'terminating' Mueller
I can predict the responses:
"Well, he's the president! He has that power!"
"There's nothing to investigate anyway!"
Right Trumpsters just think they know everything there is to know about the case.
1) How about Trump just let the investigation vindicate him if he has done no wrong doing?
2) Why aren't ANY congressional republicans backing him up on this?
Maybe if you could point out what law was ever broken, we might support keeping a special prosecutor around. Even then, if a law was broken why can't the Feds handle it?
So far there is zilch, and it's a waste of taxpayer money. He'd do the country a favor by dismissing him.
If Trump fired the special prosecutor, how would Trumpsters react?
Let me get this straight.
Yet another report saying that someone not even in government is guessing that Trump might be considering, perhaps doing something bad?
And then jumps into pointing our how baaaad Trump would be for that?
Once again, Trump never has to do anything, not even lift a finger, not even say a word. And the liberals announce it's a shocking new scandal and begin making up what Republicans are saying about it... despite the fact that Republican's haven't said anything about it, since the liberals only just made it up???
Do you people even try to deal in facts any more? Or do they just not support your destroy-Trump agenda any more?
Did they ever?![]()
Trump should fire Mueller and anyone else who wants to pursue the meritless witchhunt that simply seeks to delegimitze his awesomeness.Friend says Trump is considering 'terminating' Mueller
I can predict the responses:
"Well, he's the president! He has that power!"
"There's nothing to investigate anyway!"
Right Trumpsters just think they know everything there is to know about the case.
1) How about Trump just let the investigation vindicate him if he has done no wrong doing?
2) Why aren't ANY congressional republicans backing him up on this?