If There Was No Fraud, Why?

[RealDave]

You have to hate the America-hating Democrats, as in the Pennsylvania courts which allowed extending the dates for voting.....while the Constution states that they have no such authority.

Only a legislature has such authority.

Clearly, the election was stolen by fraud.

You must be very stupid not to know that.

Your orange hero deliberately slowed the mail service & you think that was OK. You are the America hating person here.

Trump lost. Deal with it.

 

[candycorn]

You have to hate the America-hating Democrats, as in the Pennsylvania courts which allowed extending the dates for voting.....while the Constution states that they have no such authority.

Only a legislature has such authority.

Clearly, the election was stolen by fraud.

You must be very stupid not to know that.

Didn't Texas do the same thing?

 

[Lastamender]

You have to love the whiny right. Republicans passed mail in voting in PA & when they discovered more Democrats voted by mail, the declared what they did was illegal

You happen to love the globalists that have these politicians from both parties in their pocket. That is why the law was passed.

 

[Lastamender]

Your orange hero deliberately slowed the mail service & you think that was OK. You are the America hating person here.

Trump lost. Deal with it.

That has never been proven. Try something that has been.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The election was lost by a douche. Simple as that. If you think extending voting dates constitutes a stolen election then you are high. More people voted for Biden. Trump lost. Deal with it

Watch how easily I prove a total moron:


This...

.....Or this.....

 

[PoliticalChic]

Your orange hero deliberately slowed the mail service & you think that was OK. You are the America hating person here.

Trump lost. Deal with it.

You can try to ignore this.....but I won't allow it: the Constitution spicifically forbids what states like Pennsylvania did, courts changing the rules for voting.

That makes it a stolen election from the start.




You have to hate the America-hating Democrats, as in the Pennsylvania courts which allowed extending the dates for voting.....while the Constution states that they have no such authority.

Only a legislature has such authority.

Clearly, the election was stolen by fraud.

You must be very stupid not to know that.

 

[OldFlame]

The people who insist there was no fraud keep acting like there was when they refuse to comply a subpoena.

HARRISBURG – Senate President Pro Tempore Jake Corman (R-Bellefonte) and Senate Intergovernmental Operations Committee Chair Cris Dush (R-Jefferson) issued the following statement today after filing a petition to compel the Department of State to comply with a subpoena for information relevant to the committee’s election investigation:


“Throughout the past several months since our investigation began, the Wolf Administration, Senate Democrats and Attorney General Shapiro have unfairly denied a co-equal branch of government the tools necessary to repair the vulnerabilities of our election system. Today’s legal action is intended to finally bring their needless delays and continued obstruction to an end.


“It is an embarrassment to our Commonwealth that the Department of State still refuses to comply with a legal, legitimate subpoena from a co-equal branch of government. The fact that the Department wouldn’t even turn over basic information included in the subpoena without pages upon pages of unexplained redactions shows they have no respect for the legislature or the courts. They should not be allowed to thumb their nose at the other two branches of government with impunity.

Not a conspiracy in anyway. Just a demand to help make elections more secure by looking at the information the SOS has no right to withhold.

BREAKING: Pennsylvania Senators Jake Corman and Cris Dush File Petition to Compel Sec of State to Comply with Election Related Subpoena | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

President Trump released a statement this evening about the election activities in Pennsylvania being blocked by the corrupt Secretary of State.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

And that asswipe is running for governor now, you'll never see any of this in the media or on the local news either, it's all disgusting.

 

[OldFlame]

You can try to ignore this.....but I won't allow it: the Constitution spicifically forbids what states like Pennsylvania did, courts changing the rules for voting.

That makes it a stolen election from the start.




You have to hate the America-hating Democrats, as in the Pennsylvania courts which allowed extending the dates for voting.....while the Constution states that they have no such authority.

Only a legislature has such authority.

Clearly, the election was stolen by fraud.

You must be very stupid not to know that.

The corrupt media doesn't report it, therefore it never happened. The scum 'leadership' in PA absolutely corrupted the 2020 election, the legislature did everything they could to get that information out, but it was suppressed everywhere in the propaganda machine called media.

 

[Resnic]

The people who insist there was no fraud keep acting like there was when they refuse to comply a subpoena.

HARRISBURG – Senate President Pro Tempore Jake Corman (R-Bellefonte) and Senate Intergovernmental Operations Committee Chair Cris Dush (R-Jefferson) issued the following statement today after filing a petition to compel the Department of State to comply with a subpoena for information relevant to the committee’s election investigation:


“Throughout the past several months since our investigation began, the Wolf Administration, Senate Democrats and Attorney General Shapiro have unfairly denied a co-equal branch of government the tools necessary to repair the vulnerabilities of our election system. Today’s legal action is intended to finally bring their needless delays and continued obstruction to an end.


“It is an embarrassment to our Commonwealth that the Department of State still refuses to comply with a legal, legitimate subpoena from a co-equal branch of government. The fact that the Department wouldn’t even turn over basic information included in the subpoena without pages upon pages of unexplained redactions shows they have no respect for the legislature or the courts. They should not be allowed to thumb their nose at the other two branches of government with impunity.

Not a conspiracy in anyway. Just a demand to help make elections more secure by looking at the information the SOS has no right to withhold.

BREAKING: Pennsylvania Senators Jake Corman and Cris Dush File Petition to Compel Sec of State to Comply with Election Related Subpoena | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

President Trump released a statement this evening about the election activities in Pennsylvania being blocked by the corrupt Secretary of State.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

I'm still curious if there was no fraud and The voting system was rock solid then why does Biden want to change voting laws?

I mean if it works then why change it? Nothing has changed since the last election.

I can't say for sure there was fraud, but I'm also aware of the levels he and his party will stoop to in order to keep their power.

 

[para bellum]

Read the link I provided. Trump was asked multiple times by the courts to present his evidence and he had none.

https://www.courthousenews.com/fede...ign-to-provide-proof-of-mail-in-voting-fraud/

You know that case was filed before the election, right? They were challenging the drop-boxes and the expansion of no-excuse mail in voting.

The Pennsylvania appellate court has agreed, and ruled that the law was unconstitutional.

 

[pknopp]

You know that case was filed before the election, right? They were challenging the drop-boxes and the expansion of no-excuse mail in voting.

The Pennsylvania appellate court has agreed, and ruled that the law was unconstitutional.

Same as it ever was. Case after case after case, even before judges that Trump appointed were tossed because of a lack of actual evidence.

My cousins neighbor saw........is not evidence.

 

[para bellum]

Why does a simple tabulation machine have an algorithm within it?

That is Prima Facie evidence of vote fraud no matter how much you want to deny it.

Westwall, the recount in Arizona showed that the tabulators were counting the ballots correctly. There are no manipulations at that level. The software can be configured to weight elections, but that's done on the back-end, and has not been shown to have been enabled anywhere.

What has been withheld in every State is the data. I don't care about the routers- there is not much to be learned from a router. There are access logs that are needed, and there was a lot of monkey business with the registration databases. This was AZ:

3,981 voted despite registered AFTER Oct 15 deadline
11,326 voted who were NOT on rolls on Nov 7 but WERE on Dec 4
18,000 voted and then were removed from rolls AFTER election

None of the data was turned over in AZ or any of the other States. The election servers have everything- the entire election can be reconstructed so long as the data is preserved. They went to great extents in AZ to delete the election files and tabulator totals before any hardware was turned over to the auditors, and a lot of the data is probably not recoverable now.

The Steal was a ballot-stuffing operation in those 6 key States that decide the election. Tried and true, and it worked because there was no voter verification in those large counting centers where the ballots were aggregated.

Dems have been packing the voter rolls for 2 decades. I can show you 177K new voter registrations in Georgia in a 2 week period in July 2019. None of them have GA drivers licenses or State issued ID, and only 4K of them have a social security number. That's not a normal thing- it's the work of an NGO. Possibly Stacy Abrams group, I don't know.

Source is the HAVV database, it cross references voter registrations with State Motor Vehicle databases and the Social Security Administration. It is part of the HAVA law from 2002, it was built to help States with motor voter laws verify new voters. This database is out of reach to State actors, so they can't manipulate it.

 

[RealDave]

You can try to ignore this.....but I won't allow it: the Constitution spicifically forbids what states like Pennsylvania did, courts changing the rules for voting.

That makes it a stolen election from the start.




You have to hate the America-hating Democrats, as in the Pennsylvania courts which allowed extending the dates for voting.....while the Constution states that they have no such authority.

Only a legislature has such authority.

Clearly, the election was stolen by fraud.

You must be very stupid not to know that.

So, the Republicans voted to install voting by mail.

Since there were more mail in votes by Democrats, they now declare what they did unconstitutional and somehow that is the fault of the Democrats.

The dates for voting were not extended as they had to be post marked within the set time period, you know, like the IRS & tax authorities accept post marks.

But leave it to TRump lover to ignore the attempts of Trump to cheat the system by slowing down the mail service.

 

[para bellum]

Same as it ever was. Case after case after case, even before judges that Trump appointed were tossed because of a lack of actual evidence.

My cousins neighbor saw........is not evidence.

I think it's clear the courts don't want anything to do with elections. They will rule on election law, but not in an election year...

 

[Slade3200]

Watch how easily I prove a total moron:


This...

.....Or this.....

Political talking points… we are in a far better place today than we were a year ago.

 

[pknopp]

I think it's clear the courts don't want anything to do with elections. They will rule on election law, but not in an election year...

Last year wasn't an election year.

 

[para bellum]

Last year wasn't an election year.

And last year, State courts heard challenges to the way the 2020 elections were administered. Wisconsin and Pennsylvania both, the courts said the no-excuse mail-ins and/or drop boxes were not legal.

The case you cited was filed in August of 2020. Well, that was before the 2020 election. The judge was not asking for evidence of fraud in the November election, he was asking for evidence of fraudulent mail-in ballots in prior elections.

Plaintiffs were not arguing fraud in that complaint, they were challenging the procedures that were put in place by Secretaries of State without Legislative authority.

 

[pknopp]

And last year, State courts heard challenges to the way the 2020 elections were administered. Wisconsin and Pennsylvania both, the courts said the no-excuse mail-ins and/or drop boxes were not legal.

The case you cited was filed in August of 2020. Well, that was before the 2020 election. The judge was not asking for evidence of fraud in the November election, he was asking for evidence of fraudulent mail-in ballots in prior elections.

Plaintiffs were not arguing fraud in that complaint, they were challenging the procedures that were put in place by Secretaries of State without Legislative authority.

The courts asked Trump to provide evidence of his claims. He could provide none.

 

[PoliticalChic]

So, the Republicans voted to install voting by mail.

Since there were more mail in votes by Democrats, they now declare what they did unconstitutional and somehow that is the fault of the Democrats.

The dates for voting were not extended as they had to be post marked within the set time period, you know, like the IRS & tax authorities accept post marks.

But leave it to TRump lover to ignore the attempts of Trump to cheat the system by slowing down the mail service.

The only document that Americans have agreed to be governed by is the Constitution. It is written in English….no ‘interpretation’ is required.

That document forbids any body other than the elected legislature of a state from altering voting times and procedures.

Supreme Court Allows Longer Deadlines for Absentee Ballots ...​

https://www.nytimes.com › 2020/10/28 › supreme-court-...



Dec 11, 2020 — In North Carolina, the question was whether state election officials had the power to alter such voting rules. The Pennsylvania case left open ...

A Pennsylvania court overturned the state's mail voting law ...​

https://www.inquirer.com › politics › election › pennsyl...



Jan 28, 2022 — Democrats believe the state Supreme Court will ultimately uphold the law, which passed with bipartisan support before becoming toxic in GOP ...

Pennsylvania court declares state's mail-in voting law - The ...​

https://www.washingtonpost.com › politics › 2022/01/28



Jan 28, 2022 — The two-year-old law was struck down by a Republican majority on the five-judge Commonwealth Court, but Pennsylvania's Democratic governor ...




You've been very helpful in proving that I am never wrong.....and you the very opposite.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Political talking points… we are in a far better place today than we were a year ago.

You have just exposed yourself as lying scum.