If There Was No Fraud, Why?

[Lastamender]

Lol. Fucking snowflakes.

What vulnerabilities? The magaturd party has provided absolutely no proof of said vulnerabilities. Oops.

You idiots keep claiming there is no proof. There is just no proof your lying media and authorities want to recognize. That does not mean it is not there. Two states want to decertify results and more will be coming.

 

[pknopp]

You idiots keep claiming there is no proof. There is just no proof your lying media and authorities want to recognize.

Or any single court anywhere.

 

[Lastamender]

Or any single court anywhere.

Corrupt or intimidated courts. Try the fucking truth.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

If there was no fraud why were audits and investigations blocked? If fighting to hide something means guilt you just admitted there was fraud. This is the second time you have done that.

I asked a question, that is all. A question you cannot answer, for the 2nd time

 

[postman]

You idiots keep claiming there is no proof. There is just no proof your lying media and authorities want to recognize. That does not mean it is not there. Two states want to decertify results and more will be coming.

It's not the media that is denying the BOGUS proof that people like Mike Lindel put out, claiming enough fraud to put 300 million people in prison (yes he said 300 million). It's every judge, from the supreme court, down to the lowest state district judge, both republican and democrat, saying there is no proof.

Hearsay is not proof. And too much of your so-called proof, is someone claiming they heard somebody say something to somebody.

 

[postman]

Corrupt or intimidated courts. Try the fucking truth.

Your position is that every court in the US was either intimidated, or is corrupt.

That's not going to fly.

 

[RealDave]

The truth of the matter is simple.
If there was no fraud in the 2020 election, why have PM/DSA Democrats and the appointed judiciary blocked search for evidence.
It seems that if there was no fraud in the election, they would be more than willing to prove it, rather than block the investigations.
"They doth protest too much, methinks".

So, you would not care if the police showed up at your home to search it without a warrant.

 

[Lastamender]

I asked a question, that is all. A question you cannot answer, for the 2nd time

I did answer it. You are saying Trump is guilty of something. I am saying you can't judge him if you do not judge the states withholding information the same way. Dumbass.

 

[postman]

If there was no fraud why were audits and investigations blocked? If fighting to hide something means guilt you just admitted there was fraud. This is the second time you have done that.

The better question is, why were the results of the audits, and recounts, that there was no widespread fraud.

If every audit and recount concluded that if anything, Biden got more votes in the recount, than the original count.

In light of the audits and recounts HELPING BIDEN, why spend millions of tax dollars, making the hole Trump was in deeper?

 

[Lastamender]

It's not the media that is denying the BOGUS proof that people like Mike Lindel put out, claiming enough fraud to put 300 million people in prison (yes he said 300 million). It's every judge, from the supreme court, down to the lowest state district judge, both republican and democrat, saying there is no proof.

Hearsay is not proof. And too much of your so-called proof, is someone claiming they heard somebody say something to somebody.

It was enough proof for an impeachment. What has changed?

 

[postman]

So, you would not care if the police showed up at your home to search it without a warrant.

It's a catch-22 of fishing expeditions.

They can't get a warrant without evidence. And they can't get the evidence without a warrant.

 

[pknopp]

Corrupt or intimidated courts. Try the fucking truth.

Your argument is that every single court, even the ones with judges appointed by Trump are corrupt. It wasn't that Trump presented no evidence, I guess the courts should have found for Trump with no evidence to show how "fair" they are. LOL

But meh, let's go with every single court in the country is corrupt. With that being the case, let it go, you can't win.

 

[postman]

It was enough proof for an impeachment. What has changed?

Those people were first hand witnesses to the conversation. There was a hearsay exception because the person they overheard REFUSED to testify.
Exceptions to the hearsay rule for unavailable witnesses The first category of exceptions to the hearsay rule concerns specific circumstances where the prosecution or defence have the witness’s statement in written or recorded form, but are unable to get the original witness to court.

 

[Lastamender]

Your argument is that every single court, even the ones with judges appointed by Trump are corrupt. It wasn't that Trump presented no evidence, I guess the courts should have found for Trump with no evidence to show how "fair" they are. LOL

But meh, let's go with every single court in the country is corrupt. With that being the case, let it go, you can't win.

The evidence that would have proven fraud never made it to court. That is a fact. The rest is just gloating, bullying, and intimidation by the powers that be.

 

[pknopp]

The evidence that would have proven fraud never made it to court. That is a fact. The rest is just gloating, bullying, and intimidation by the powers that be.

https://www.courthousenews.com/fede...ign-to-provide-proof-of-mail-in-voting-fraud/

 

[Lastamender]

Those people were first hand witnesses to the conversation. There was a hearsay exception because the person they overheard REFUSED to testify.
Exceptions to the hearsay rule for unavailable witnesses The first category of exceptions to the hearsay rule concerns specific circumstances where the prosecution or defence have the witness’s statement in written or recorded form, but are unable to get the original witness to court.

The exception was that it is alright to break the law to get Trump. Nothing more than an abuse of power by a bunch of assholes representing themselves not te people who elected them.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It's not the media that is denying the BOGUS proof that people like Mike Lindel put out, claiming enough fraud to put 300 million people in prison (yes he said 300 million). It's every judge, from the supreme court, down to the lowest state district judge, both republican and democrat, saying there is no proof.

Hearsay is not proof. And too much of your so-called proof, is someone claiming they heard somebody say something to somebody.

Every day we see posts from Democrat supporters, evincing a palpable fear, as the evidence piles up: it was a stolen election.
Biden got no where near 81 million legitimate votes.


Ballot Bombshells: 20 episodes exposing fraud, illegalities and irregularities in 2020 election
Illegal rule changes, ballot harvesting, Iranian voter hack are among the many now-confirmed serious irregularities, putting the lie to the "perfect election" narrative.

"Here are 20 of the most important revelations uncovered by Just the News over the last 15 months of reporting, complete with substantiating evidence and links"

1. A Foreign Intrusion. Federal authorities have confirmed that two Iranian nationals successfully hacked into a state computer election system, stole 100,000 voter registrations and used the data to carry out a cyber-intimidation campaign that targeted GOP members of Congress, Trump campaign officials and Democratic voters in the November 2020 election in one of the largest foreign intrusions in U.S. election history. The defendants "were part of a coordinated conspiracy in which Iranian hackers sought to undermine faith and confidence in the U.S. presidential election," U.S. Attorney Damian Williams declared in an indictment.
2. Alleged Bribery. The former state Supreme Court justice appointed by the Wisconsin Legislature to investigate the 2020 election concluded that millions of dollars in donations to election administrators in five Democrat-heavy municipalities from the Mark Zuckerberg-funded Center for Tech and Civic Life violated state anti-bribery laws and corrupted election practices by turning public election authorities into liberal get-out-the-vote activists. “The Zuckerberg-funded CTCL/ Zuckerberg 5 scheme would prove to be an effective way to accomplish the partisan effort to 'turnout' their desired voters and it was done with the active support of the very people and the governmental institution (WEC) that were supposed to be guarding the Wisconsin elections administrative process from the partisan activities they facilitated,” Justice Michael Gableman wrote.
3. Illegal ballot harvesting in Wisconsin. Gableman also exposed an extensive vote collection operation, known as ballot harvesting, in nursing homes in which third-party activists illegally collected the ballots of vulnerable residents, some of whom lacked the mental or physical capacity to vote or were forbidden from voting by guardianship agreements. State election regulators “unlawfully directed the municipal clerks not to send out the legally required special voting deputies to nursing homes, resulting in many nursing homes’ registered residents voting at 100% rates and many ineligible residents voting, despite a guardianship order or incapacity,” Gableman wrote in his explosive report.
4. Ballot harvesting probe in the Peach State. Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger has announced he has opened a criminal investigation into allegations that liberal activists engaged in illegal ballot harvesting, collecting ballots from voters and delivering them in violation of state law. Raffensperger said he is planning to issue subpoenas to identify a whistleblower who admitted he engaged in the operation, and there could be prosecutions. The True the Vote election integrity group says in a formal state complaint that the man, identified as John Doe, admitted his role and identified nonprofits who funded it at $10 per ballot delivered. The watchdog group also claims it has assembled cell phone location records pinpointing the alleged harvesting by as many as 240 activists.
5. Bad voter signatures? A review of Maricopa County's mail-in ballots in Arizona's 2020 presidential election estimated that more than 200,000 ballots with signatures that did not match voter files were counted without being reviewed, more than eight times the number the county acknowledged.
6. 50,000 Arizona ballots called into question. An extensive audit by Arizona’s Senate officially called into question more than 50,000 ballots cast in the 2020 election, including voters who cast ballots from residences they had left. The tally in question is nearly five times the margin of Joe Biden’s victory in the state.
7. Illegal ballot drop boxes. A Wisconsin judge has ruled the widespread use of ballot drop boxes in 2020 was unlawful, and the state Supreme Court let that ruling stand. That means drop boxes can’t be used in future elections starting in April. It also means that tens of thousands of ballots in the 2020 election were cast unlawfully.
8. Foreign voters found on Texas rolls. An audit of Texas voter rolls identified nearly 12,000 noncitizens suspected of illegally registering to vote and nearly 600 cases in which ballots may have been cast in the name of a dead resident or by a voter who may also have voted in another state. Officials are now in the process of removing the foreign voters and deciding whether prosecutions are warranted.
9. Foreign voters found on Georgia rolls. An audit by Georgia’s Secretary of State has identified more than 2,000 suspected foreigners who tried to register to vote in the state, though none reached the point of casting ballots. Raffensperger says prosecutions may be forthcoming.
10. Unconstitutional mail-in voting. The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court has concluded the state law that opened the door to no-excuse mail-in voting in 2020 was unconstitutional and that mail-in voting can only be enacted by a constitutional amendment. “A constitutional amendment must be presented to the people and adopted into our fundamental law before legislation authorizing no-excuse mail-in voting can be placed upon our statute books,” the court ruled. About 2.5 million voted by mail in Pennsylvania in 2020, votes now called into question by the ruling.
11. More noncitizen voters. The Gableman investigation in Wisconsin also found noncitizens had made it onto the state voters rolls in violation of state law. The Wisconsin Election Commission failed “to record non-citizens in the WisVote voter database, thereby permitting non-citizens to vote, even though Wisconsin law requires citizenship to vote — all in violation of the Help America Vote Act,” the investigator wrote.
12. Ballot chain of custody issues. The Georgia Secretary of State's office has opened an investigation into the handling of drop box ballots last November in one of the state's Democratic strongholds following a media report that there were problems with chain of custody documentation in DeKalb County.
13. Fulton County irregularities. Georgia’s handpicked election monitor for Fulton County, the state’s largest voting district, documented two dozen pages of mismanagement and irregularities during vote counting in Atlanta in November 2020, including double-scanning of ballots, insecure transport of ballots and violations of voter privacy. The revelations prompted the state to take steps to possibly put Fulton County in receivership, empowering state officials to run the elections. Most of Fulton County's election officials have left their jobs.
14. Errant vote counting. Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp referred the audited November 2020 election results in Fulton County to the State Election Board after multiple reviews found three dozen significant problems with absentee ballot counting, including duplicate tallies, math errors and transposed data. Kemp’s referral calls into question hundreds of ballots in the official count.
15. Dirty voter rolls. Michigan’s official state auditor has found that Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson failed to adhere to state election law by properly updating and reconciling Michigan’s qualified voter roll. This oversight, according to the audit, increased the risk of ineligible voters casting ballots.
16. Illegal exemptions from voter ID. The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled as many as 200,000 voters were allowed to illegally skip voter ID for absentee ballots by claiming they were indefinitely confined by COVID when there was no such legal authority to do so. Biden beat Trump by about 20,000 votes in the state.
17. Uneven enforcement of election laws. The Wisconsin Legislative Audit Bureau identified more than 30 problems with the administration of elections in 2020, including unlawful orders and uneven enforcement of the law and urged lawmakers to make sweeping improvements.
18. More illegal harvesting. In Arizona, a half dozen people have already been indicted on charges of illegal harvesting in a probe by Attorney General Mark Brnovich that shows signs of expanding. It comes after the U.S. Supreme Court rejected Democrats' arguments and concluded Arizona’s ban on harvesting was constitutional.
19. Voter fraud in Michigan. Michigan charged three women in connection with voter fraud schemes, including efforts to cast ballots on behalf of non-consenting nursing home residents.
20. Still more nursing home fraud. In Wisconsin, Racine County Sheriff Christopher Schmaling announced his investigators have secured evidence that eight out of 42 residents at a local nursing home had been recorded as casting absentee ballots that their families said was not possible because the residents didn't possess the cognitive ability to vote." Ballot Bombshells: 20 episodes exposing fraud, illegalities and irregularities in 2020 election

 

[postman]

The evidence that would have proven fraud never made it to court. That is a fact.

Were Trumps lawyers that inept that they didn't bother to bring any evidence to present to the court in their complaint?

I would think they would at least have filed a motion for summary judgement, or expediated judgement, and presented the evidence to back it up.

If they didn't present evidence, it's obvious, it's because they had none.

 

[postman]

"Here are 20 of the most important revelations uncovered by Just the News over the last 15 months of reporting, complete with substantiating evidence and links"

Then present them to a judge.

Right now they're just wasting ink.

 

[Lastamender]

EXCLUSIVE: Maricopa County Supervisor Bill Gates Continues to Play Victim and Refuses to Turn Election Routers Over to Inspectors... Why Is That? (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

Maricopa County Chairman Bill Gates, Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, and Pasco County Supervisor Brian Corely recently chaired a McCain Institute panel titled, “Defending American Democracy: When Local Elections Are Threatened, What Are The National Implications?”.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

What is on the routers? If there was no fraud what is the problem? How much of this crap are people who deserve answers supposed to tolerate? Wouldn't an examination of the routers vindicate Maricopa County? Why won't they help prove there was no fraud?

These politicians are complaining because people want proof the election was fair? What kind of shit is that? Honor the people and their right to know, that is what you were elected for.