If There Was No Fraud, Why?

How long have you been in this country, me I was born here a little over 60yrs ago. How about you?

Here is a book you need to read.

View attachment 631385



What did I say I 'heard about black people'?


I provided specific data.



I don't believe you even read that or any book.....but here are some I read:

1650114975974.png





And

Losing the Race: Self-Sabotage in Black America Paperback –​

by John McWhorter




and

Uncle Sam's Plantation: How Big Government Enslaves America's Poor and What We Can Do About It,

by Star Parker




and...
1650115328575.png





I'm sure some nice adult will help you get a library card.
 

Attachments

  • 1650115025919.png
    1650115025919.png
    49.6 KB · Views: 21
  • 1650115050926.png
    1650115050926.png
    49.6 KB · Views: 20
How long have you been in this country, me I was born here a little over 60yrs ago. How about you?

Here is a book you need to read.

View attachment 631385




Funny that you were born here, yet I am more of an American.


I’m a conservative…but I am far more liberal than any Leftist because I’m an American, with American values, and those values are about individual liberty and freedom and the American ethic and the Bill of Rights and the Constitution and the privileges bestowed by God, not by the state. The other side views everything as bestowed by the power of the state because, in their mind, they were responsible for the death of God long ago. Everyone who votes Democrat may not be quite as far as the fringe radicals who have taken over their party, but they certainly are what Lenin called ‘useful idiots.’
 
The people who insist there was no fraud keep acting like there was when they refuse to comply a subpoena.

HARRISBURG – Senate President Pro Tempore Jake Corman (R-Bellefonte) and Senate Intergovernmental Operations Committee Chair Cris Dush (R-Jefferson) issued the following statement today after filing a petition to compel the Department of State to comply with a subpoena for information relevant to the committee’s election investigation:


“Throughout the past several months since our investigation began, the Wolf Administration, Senate Democrats and Attorney General Shapiro have unfairly denied a co-equal branch of government the tools necessary to repair the vulnerabilities of our election system. Today’s legal action is intended to finally bring their needless delays and continued obstruction to an end.


“It is an embarrassment to our Commonwealth that the Department of State still refuses to comply with a legal, legitimate subpoena from a co-equal branch of government. The fact that the Department wouldn’t even turn over basic information included in the subpoena without pages upon pages of unexplained redactions shows they have no respect for the legislature or the courts. They should not be allowed to thumb their nose at the other two branches of government with impunity.

Not a conspiracy in anyway. Just a demand to help make elections more secure by looking at the information the SOS has no right to withhold.


Send in the Marshalls and take it by force
 
What did I say I 'heard about black people'?


I provided specific data.



I don't believe you even read that or any book.....but here are some I read:

View attachment 631394




And

Losing the Race: Self-Sabotage in Black America Paperback –​

by John McWhorter




and

Uncle Sam's Plantation: How Big Government Enslaves America's Poor and What We Can Do About It,

by Star Parker




and...View attachment 631400




I'm sure some nice adult will help you get a library card.
I have read all those books, don't agree with a lot of it.
 
Funny that you were born here, yet I am more of an American.
Hmm, how are you more of an American? Explain.
I’m a conservative…but I am far more liberal than any Leftist because I’m an American, with American values, and those values are about individual liberty and freedom and the American ethic and the Bill of Rights and the Constitution and the privileges bestowed by God, not by the state. The other side views everything as bestowed by the power of the state because, in their mind, they were responsible for the death of God long ago. Everyone who votes Democrat may not be quite as far as the fringe radicals who have taken over their party, but they certainly are what Lenin called ‘useful idiots.’
How long have you been in America?
 
Hmm, how are you more of an American? Explain.

How long have you been in America?


Because Americans don't support this:


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,

socialism,

infanticide,

opposition to free speech,

standing with criminals and felons rather than law-abiding citizens

substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,

support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,

accepting payment from Communist China for future considerations,

and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.
 
Because Americans don't support this:


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,

socialism,

infanticide,

opposition to free speech,

standing with criminals and felons rather than law-abiding citizens

substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,

support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,

accepting payment from Communist China for future considerations,

and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.
Most of that is just right wing propaganda, how long have you been in America?
 
I have read all those books, don't agree with a lot of it.


Don't agree???????????


These folks explained their lives and their experiences.

How could you not agree?????


Are they lying???????




Joseph C. Phillips, “He Talk Like a White Boy”

  1. In eighth grade English class, 1974, after I gave what must have been a brilliant and insightful observation, a black girl across the room raised her hand, and announced to the class, “He talk like a white boy!”
  2. What did LaQueesha mean? That is spoke clearly? Intelligently? That some timbre was missing from my voice? That moment was the beginning of my life.
  3. It was suddenly clear that my definition of my black self was unimportant: my membership credentials to the brotherhood were confiscated and ripped to shreds. The way I spoke, the sound of my voice, my diction, clearly meant that I was trying to be something I wasn’t. I was an outsider.


What is wrong with 'talking like a white boy'????

Why do your Democrat masters warn you not to be successful?????


Why did Smithsonian list the 'white' traits you must not have?????

“The chart endeavors to list "the ways white people and their traditions, attitudes and ways of life have been normalized over time and are now considered standard practices in the United States." Among those traditions, attitudes, and ways of life are: Individualism, hard work, objectivity, the nuclear family, a belief in progress, a written tradition, politeness, the justice system, respect for authority, delayed gratification and planning for the future, plus much more.” Smithsonian Goes Full Marxist: Nuclear Family, Science, Christianity All Part of Oppressive 'Whiteness'




Can you be so dumb not to see that the Democrats want to keep you a slave?????
 
Most of that is just right wing propaganda, how long have you been in America?

"... how long have you been in America?"

Why?



Name any that isn't true and I'll ram the lie back down your throat:


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism,

socialism,

infanticide,

opposition to free speech,

standing with criminals and felons rather than law-abiding citizens

substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry,

support for rioters, arsonists, murderers, and anarchists,

accepting payment from Communist China for future considerations,

and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.
 
Is any state agency other than a legislatue legally allowed to alter voting times and procedures?



The correct answer is "no."


Therefore, the election was illegitimate.
Wrong. Even if a state agency broke a law or rule in their execution of running an election, that would not delegitimize the entire election. The case would be taken to the courts for review and judgement. That’s what the constitution directs to happen. That’s what happened. The courts did not determine the election to be illegitimate. The results stood. That’s how it works.
 
Wrong. Even if a state agency broke a law or rule in their execution of running an election, that would not delegitimize the entire election. The case would be taken to the courts for review and judgement. That’s what the constitution directs to happen. That’s what happened. The courts did not determine the election to be illegitimate. The results stood. That’s how it works.


You are, of course, a low-life scummy liar.

The Constitution clearly states that only an elected legislature can do so.
 
You are, of course, a low-life scummy liar.

The Constitution clearly states that only an elected legislature can do so.
Nope. The legislature makes the rules. The courts decided what to do if the rules are broken or challenged. That’s what happened per our constitutional process. You are either confused or lying.

I do appreciate you having a normal discussion without the repeat copy and paste… kudos for that
 
Nope. The legislature makes the rules. The courts decided what to do if the rules are broken or challenged. That’s what happened per our constitutional process. You are either confused or lying.

I do appreciate you having a normal discussion without the repeat copy and paste… kudos for that


Why are you back.....we've agreed that you are a low-life scummy liar.

Yesterday you admitted that the Constitution is the law of the land, and I caught you lying in some claim that the Constitution gives courts the abilty to change the text.....



What more is there to say?

You're a liar.
 
it was in the courts because lawsuits were filed by lawyers.
Just because a series of corrupt courts.....including the 'supreme' one.....wouldn't hear the evidence doesn't mean there wasn't clear and dispositive evidence.



I can provide it.



The Constitution is known as ‘the law of the land.’

The U.S. Constitution calls itself the "supreme law of the land." This clause is taken to mean that when state constitutions or laws passed by state legislatures or the national Congress are found to conflict with the federal Constitution, they have no force.

The Constitution as Supreme Law

http://www.let.rug.nl › usa › outlines › government-1991




The fact is that the only document that Americans have agreed to be governed by is the Constitution. It is written in English….no ‘interpretation’ is required.



Wherein we find this:
Under the second clause of Article II of the Constitution, the legislatures of the several states have exclusive power to direct the manner in which the electors of President and Vice President shall be appointed.
Such appointment may be made by the legislatures directly, or by popular vote in districts, or by general ticket, as may be provided by the legislature.”


McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892)

supreme.justia.com



But....this occurred: courts altered voting rules.
“In Pennsylvania, the question was whether the state’s Supreme Court could override voting rules set by the state legislature. In North Carolina, the question was whether state election officials had the power to alter such voting rules.”
NYTimes

Sooo.....no, the election was not correctly decided, and we don't actually know who won the election.






Article VI, Paragraph 2 of the U.S. Constitution is commonly referred to as the Supremacy Clause. It establishes that the federal constitution, and federal law generally, take precedence over state laws, and even state constitutions.

Supremacy Clause | Wex | US Law
 
Why are you back.....we've agreed that you are a low-life scummy liar.

Yesterday you admitted that the Constitution is the law of the land, and I caught you lying in some claim that the Constitution gives courts the abilty to change the text.....



What more is there to say?

You're a liar.
Again you are wrong. I never agreed that I’m a lowlife liar. How you could put that together and think I actually agreed to that shows how nutty and irrational you are.

I also never said the courts could change the text of the constitution. That’s a lie. Don’t agree? Then prove me wrong and show the quotes where I said those two things.
 
Again you are wrong. I never agreed that I’m a lowlife liar. How you could put that together and think I actually agreed to that shows how nutty and irrational you are.

I also never said the courts could change the text of the constitution. That’s a lie. Don’t agree? Then prove me wrong and show the quotes where I said those two things.


Did you admit yesterday that the Constitution is the law of the land?

Does the Constitution give exclusive right to decide election rules to the legislature?


I'm never wrong.

You are a liar.

But.....a Democrat in good standing.
 

Forum List

Back
Top