If the Ashli Babbitt murder/shooting was so justified why was she the only one shot? Didn’t hundreds break in?

[tahuyaman]

OK, got it. Cool.
So, let's you and I allow it to serve both you and the OP.
My response works both ways.
Think of it as ambidextrous. But not bi.

She was indeed stopped, but she posed no dangerous threat to anyone.

 

[tahuyaman]

That's like creating a force field around yourself.

Are you really denying the existence of sanctuary cities and states?

 

[pknopp]

Are you really denying the existence of sanctuary cities and states?

I've done this 50 times. I did it in this thread. Address what I said there.

 

[tahuyaman]

I've done this 50 times. I did it in this thread. Address what I said there.

What you said made no sense.

 

[Chillicothe]

"She was indeed stopped, but she posed no dangerous threat to anyone." (emphasis by my avatar)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Should we note that the above opinion about "no dangerous threat to anyone"....is being offered about 360 days after the event, from many miles (dozens? hundreds? thousands?) from where the event actually occurred? That the poster was not, in fact, at the scene at the time of the shooting? Was not privy to the communication received in the officer's earpiece? could not see exactly what the officer was seeing from his perspective? Does not know what the officer knew at the time.

So, if the good poster is merely some version of a long distance observer....in time and space....well then, I would demur on his rather subjective opinion of 'no danger'.

Instead, I would concede credibility to the people who were actually right there, in the moment.....and were forced by mob action to make nano-second decisions in real time.

Yupper, I think their perception has more traction than the good poster 'tahuya's.

But that's just me.

 

[pknopp]

What you said made no sense.

What part?

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

There is a clear picture of the window
It’s at least 2x4 feet.
You agree

Is that a question? And where is the picture? And what does it matter?

 

[tahuyaman]

What part?

All of it. It was stupid.

 

[pknopp]

All of it. It was stupid.

All of it was factual which is why you won't actually address it.

 

[tahuyaman]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Should we note that the above opinion about "no dangerous threat to anyone"....is being offered about 360 days after the event, from many miles (dozens? hundreds? thousands?) from where the event actually occurred? That the poster was not, in fact, at the scene at the time of the shooting? Was not privy to the communication received in the officer's earpiece? could not see exactly what the officer was seeing from his perspective? Does not know what the officer knew at the time.

So, if the good poster is merely some version of a long distance observer....in time and space....well then, I would demur on his rather subjective opinion of 'no danger'.

Instead, I would concede credibility to the people who were actually right there, in the moment.....and were forced by mob action to make nano-second decisions in real time.

Yupper, I think their perception has more traction than the good poster 'tahuya's.

But that's just me.

On January 6, she posed no threat to harm any person.

 

[tahuyaman]

All of it was factual which is why you won't actually address it.

What factual?

Here's a fact. There are states and cities who have declared themselves sanctuary cities and sanctuary states. You can talk about force fields or any other stupid stuff you want.

 

[Winco]

Is that a question? And where is the picture? And what does it matter?

I posted the picture. Post #619
You denied it.
You want me to post it again? **** You.
Just look back YLF.

It matters, because others follow. If she was no harm or threat, WHY did she try to enter? What was her intent?

 

[tahuyaman]

What factual?

Here's a fact. There are states and cities who have declared themselves sanctuary cities and sanctuary states. You can talk about force fields or any other stupid stuff you want.

Some idiot disagreed with that. I guess that moron doesn't like facts

 

[Faun]

She was indeed stopped, but she posed no dangerous threat to anyone.

Bullshit.

 

[tahuyaman]

Bullshit.

She was unarmed and posed no serious threat to anyone. The application of deadly force in her case was not legit.

 

[Faun]

She was unarmed and posed no serious threat to anyone. The application of deadly force in her case was not legit.

False. She was not there alone. She was part of a violent mob trying to break into an area where members of Congress and staff were holed up. She just happen to be the first of that mob to breach the doors into the Speaker's Lobby. To keep that violent mob out, of which she was an active participant, lethal force was needed.

 

[tahuyaman]

False. She was not there alone. She was part of a violent mob trying to break into an area where members of Congress and staff were holed up. She just happen to be the first of that mob to breach the doors into the Speaker's Lobby. To keep that violent mob out, of which she was an active participant, lethal force was needed.

Then why was she the only person killed? I'll tell you why. The particular officer who killed her panicked. Deadly force was not necessary. The elected officials had already been evacuated. They were in no danger.

 

[Faun]

Then why was she the only person killed? I'll tell you why. The particular officer who killed her panicked. Deadly force was not necessary. The elected officials had already been evacuated. They were in no danger.

How many times need this be answered until you yahoos get it??

She was the only one killed because she was the only one stupid enough to breach the police barricade. The moment that cop pulled out his gun, everyone else back off. They stopped pounding on the doors and windows and some yelled, he's got a gun! Here's the part you simpletons can't seem to grasp. The cop shot her to keep that violent mob out while some lawmakers and staff were still holed up inside the House chamber. And it worked. No one else tried to enter and no one else needed to be shot to be kept out. That cop is a hero who saved lives because he would have had to shoot many of those nuts had they followed Benedict Babbitt.

 

[Hum Dinger]

Are they? Perhaps you might ask Connecticut Sen. Richard Blumenthal.

There are a growing number of people in this nation who disagree with your opinion. Democrats used to be anti-communist but now not so much.

Perhaps it is you that is the dumbass. Stop acting like an ostrich and pull your head out of the sand and watch what is happening around you.

As Sen. Blumenthal stands with communists, will fellow Democrats stand with him?

It’s hard for “progressive” Democrats to avoid being likened to communists when a leading Democratic U.S. senator openly consorts with, yes, communists.

www.washingtonexaminer.com

It’s hard for “progressive” Democrats to avoid being likened to communists when a leading Democratic U.S. senator openly consorts with, yes, communists.

And this wasn’t just an encounter of happenstance. This was a preplanned, open, full embrace of a Communist Party event, accompanied by fulsome praise for the Communist Party hosts. What it means is that even if U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut isn’t himself a communist, he is indisputably a fellow traveler.

Here's How to Tell if a Democrat is Actually a Communist

It is a real possibility that we could at some point in the very near future be bordering on a communist nation if the liberals and Democrats have their way.

thepoliticalinsider.com

Communist Party USA Announces Alignment With Democrats

The National Committee of the Communist Party USA announced an alignment with the Democratic party, likely as a way to make headlines. In an in-depth write-up titled, “People’s World," John Batchell, the current chairman of the

prepforthat.com

Why do Democrats love socialism?

Too many Americans on the left are simply unaware of how capitalism benefits our great nation.

thehill.com

Do you even read the articles you post?

First, Blumenthal made it clear that he did not agree with the goals of the organization. He wasn't even addressing the 'Communist Party', he was addressing the 'Connecticut People's World committee', and honoring them for the work they do supporting working Americans.

Second, American people are free to believe whatever they want. It's still the obligation of our elected representatives to communicate with them.

Third, regardless of whatever theoretical political system these people believe in, until they commit a crime they are free to believe whatever they like - welcome to Democracy!

Fourth, it is a crime and an act of treason to attack the Capitol building and try to stop Congress from performing its duties.

Finally, if anything, there is a growing number of Americans that believe that European Socialism would be best for this country. Anti-socialism is dying out.

 

[Hum Dinger]

Your question that asks if someone will deny being a "bag of shit"?

It's not valid at all.

There are two types pf people that promote the idea that the election was stolen.

The first type are those that actually believe it. They are morons (IMHO).

The second - and by far the majority, know very well that the election was not stolen, but keep insisting it was for nefarious reasons. They are lying and they know it. They are lying bags of shit (IMHO)