- Sep 28, 2010
- 56,083
- 16,294
- 2,180
There isn't a word to describe the damage this socialist has done to our country.
Sure there is. None.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There isn't a word to describe the damage this socialist has done to our country.
Makes watergate look like a rose garden.
Watergate, ROTF. Next it's gonna be Obama's Waterloo too!
There isn't a word to describe the damage this socialist has done to our country.
Makes watergate look like a rose garden.
Watergate, ROTF. Next it's gonna be Obama's Waterloo too!
Anyone murdered, killed in watergate? Both had lies, deception, cover-ups did they not?
There isn't a word to describe the damage this socialist has done to our country.
Yes there is. The word is 'none'.
Mr. Romney decided to try and score political points and spoke when he didn't have all the facts.
There isn't a word to describe the damage this socialist has done to our country.
Yes there is. The word is 'none'.
He renewed the Patriot Act. Come on now.
Yes there is. The word is 'none'.
He renewed the Patriot Act. Come on now.
Renewed? So that damage was already done? I'll grant you he continue down that path......
There isn't a word to describe the damage this socialist has done to our country.
Yes there is. The word is 'none'.
He renewed the Patriot Act. Come on now.
So how'd that Fast 'n' Furious thing go again?
On CNN's "State of the Union" on September 30, Candy Crowley insisted David Axelrod, President Barack Obama's chief strategist, was wrong when Axelrod tried to claim President Barack Obama called the Benghazi attack "an act of terror" on the day after.
"First, they said it was not planned, it was part of this tape," Crowley said when Axelrod tried to spin her.
This was Crowley the journalist, unlike the pro-Obama advocate who moderated Tuesday's debate between Obama and Mitt Romney and interjected herself into an argument between Obama and Romney on the exact same issue -- and took Obama's side.
During the debate, Crowley affirmed Obama's assertion that he referred to the Benghazi attacks as acts of terror on the day after.
After Romney correctly said it took Obama 14 days before Obama said the the Benghazi attacks were acts of terror, Crowley took Obama's side -- to an ovation from the town hall audience -- and she proclaimed Obama had indeed claimed the Benghazi attacks were acts of terror the day after the attacks in the White House Rose Garden.
On September 12, the day after the attacks, Obama did say the words "acts of terror" but he was not referring to the attacks that killed U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens.
Crowley knew that on September 30 and she conceded it again hours after the debate when she went on CNN and said while Romney "was right in the main, but he just chose the wrong word." But the damage had already been done.
With Obama's reelection on the line, Crowley seemed to have conveniently forgotten the facts she knew two weeks before when she grilled Axelrod in a way she should have Obama.
Across 166 pages of internal State Department documents -- released Friday by a pair of Republican congressmen pressing the Obama administration for more answers on the Benghazi terrorist attack -- slain U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and the security officers assigned to protect him repeatedly sounded alarms to their superiors in Washington about the intensifying lawlessness and violence in Eastern Libya, where Stevens ultimately died.
On Sept. 11 -- the day Stevens and three other Americans were killed -- the ambassador signed a three-page cable, labeled "sensitive," in which he noted "growing problems with security" in Benghazi and "growing frustration" on the part of local residents with Libyan police and security forces. These forces the ambassador characterized as "too weak to keep the country secure."
Watergate, ROTF. Next it's gonna be Obama's Waterloo too!
Anyone murdered, killed in watergate? Both had lies, deception, cover-ups did they not?
Only Watergate had lies, deceptions and cover-ups from the sitting President. This was an attack on the United States that kill four Americans. The only lies and deceptions in this whole tragedy are from the Romney camp. Mr. Romney decided to try and score political points and spoke when he didn't have all the facts.
If Obama understood that the attack in Benghazi was an act of Terror unrelated to the movie, why did he spend 2 weeks claiming it was a direct result of the movie? Why did he send his Ambassador to the UN to say specifically it was caused by the movie?
Where were his briefings from the Intel agencies and the State Department all of whom have stated then knew right away it was a terrorist attack unrelated to the movie?
If the State Department knew it was a terror attack unrelated to the Movie why did they allow the UN Ambassador to say it was connected to the movie?
Watergate, ROTF. Next it's gonna be Obama's Waterloo too!
Anyone murdered, killed in watergate? Both had lies, deception, cover-ups did they not?
Only Watergate had lies, deceptions and cover-ups from the sitting President. This was an attack on the United States that kill four Americans. The only lies and deceptions in this whole tragedy are from the Romney camp. Mr. Romney decided to try and score political points and spoke when he didn't have all the facts.
Mr. Romney decided to try and score political points and spoke when he didn't have all the facts.
If they knew it was terror attack why did Biden tell the nation it was intelligence failure ?