If Obama understood it was a terrorist attack?

[Misty]

Crowley sounds like Clinton. Romney was right but used the wrong word? Wtf. Is that what is means?

 

[Katzndogz]

obama is not cooperating with the senate investigation. One of the big questions is why did the CIA leave? The building known as The Annex was a CIA base. They left days before the attack. That's the vacant building Ambassador Stevens went to because it had a safe room.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

A chance for Obama to explain his self for all his fuck ups.


Read all about it...Obama spins and lies!!!!


Time line of lies!

Obama's Benghazi Lies - Home

Destroys Obama's case. It wasn't about a fucking terrorist attack, BUT the protest over our freedom of speech.

On the 13th he was talking about the protest when he said terrorized.

Susan Rice said on the 16th that this wasn't a pre-planned attack. LIES

On the 18th Obama went on the letterman show and blamed our first amendment for the attack. LIES!!!

If the terrorized was supposed to mean a terrorist attack. Well, Obama sure inserted his foot in his ass.

Clinton on the 21st was the first to say it was a Terrorist attack. SPIN!

Obama on the view on the 25th said it was about the fucking video! Spin some more!!!

Carney maintains Libya attack was not preplanned - YouTube

Who is responsible for the attack in Benghazi? - YouTube




Biden blatantly lied about Chris Stevens wanting more Security
The Fact Checker


“We weren’t told they wanted more security there. We did not know they wanted more security.”

— Biden, speaking of the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya

Biden’s bold statement was directly contradicted by State Department officials just this week, in testimony before a congressional panel and in unclassified cables released by a congressional committee.

“All of us at post were in sync that we wanted these resources,” said Eric Nordstrom, the top regional security officer in Libya earlier this year. A Utah national guardsman who led a security team, Lt. Col. Andrew Wood, said: “We felt great frustration that those requests were ignored or just never met.”



September 12, 2012 - President Obama Speaks on Libya Attacks that killed US Ambassador Chris Stevens - YouTube

@ 5:00-6:20 you can hear the context in which he mentioned terrorism, Romney was correct in his assertation as, in context, Obama was referring to terrorism in general and not specifically the attack
====

Candy wasn't even right here as Obama said "terror" in the context of the protest.



Crowley to Axelrod: Obama Never Said Benghazi Attack Was 'Act of Terror
Breitbart ^ | 17 Oct 2012, 3:44 AM PDT | Tony Lee
Crowley to Axelrod: Obama Never Said Benghazi Attack Was 'Act of Terror'

On CNN's "State of the Union" on September 30, Candy Crowley insisted David Axelrod, President Barack Obama's chief strategist, was wrong when Axelrod tried to claim President Barack Obama called the Benghazi attack "an act of terror" on the day after.
"First, they said it was not planned, it was part of this tape," Crowley said when Axelrod tried to spin her.
This was Crowley the journalist, unlike the pro-Obama advocate who moderated Tuesday's debate between Obama and Mitt Romney and interjected herself into an argument between Obama and Romney on the exact same issue -- and took Obama's side.
During the debate, Crowley affirmed Obama's assertion that he referred to the Benghazi attacks as acts of terror on the day after.
After Romney correctly said it took Obama 14 days before Obama said the the Benghazi attacks were acts of terror, Crowley took Obama's side -- to an ovation from the town hall audience -- and she proclaimed Obama had indeed claimed the Benghazi attacks were acts of terror the day after the attacks in the White House Rose Garden.
On September 12, the day after the attacks, Obama did say the words "acts of terror" but he was not referring to the attacks that killed U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens.
Crowley knew that on September 30 and she conceded it again hours after the debate when she went on CNN and said while Romney "was right in the main, but he just chose the wrong word." But the damage had already been done.
With Obama's reelection on the line, Crowley seemed to have conveniently forgotten the facts she knew two weeks before when she grilled Axelrod in a way she should have Obama.

---
Yet we learn today that Stevens was begging for months for security??? WTF is wrong with the Obama Admin. If you leftist had any honor you wouldn't vote for Obama.


Documents show Stevens worried about Libya security threats, Al Qaeda before consulate attack
Fox News ^ | 10-19-2012 | James Rosen
Documents show Stevens worried about Libya security threats, Al Qaeda before consulate attack | Fox News

Across 166 pages of internal State Department documents -- released Friday by a pair of Republican congressmen pressing the Obama administration for more answers on the Benghazi terrorist attack -- slain U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and the security officers assigned to protect him repeatedly sounded alarms to their superiors in Washington about the intensifying lawlessness and violence in Eastern Libya, where Stevens ultimately died.

On Sept. 11 -- the day Stevens and three other Americans were killed -- the ambassador signed a three-page cable, labeled "sensitive," in which he noted "growing problems with security" in Benghazi and "growing frustration" on the part of local residents with Libyan police and security forces. These forces the ambassador characterized as "too weak to keep the country secure."

You're an idiot. In his rose garden statement the president preceded AND followed his reference to 'acts of terror' with specific references to the Benghazi attack and to the four Americans who were killed.

You have to be an idiot to deny he was calling it a terrorist attack.

Strange, I just reread it to be sure I was remembering it correctly, and before the comment he spent two paragraphs talking about how he spent the previous day visiting Arlington and the wounded warriors at Walter reed on the anniversary of 9/11. I think the idiot here is the one that is trying to argue he was talking about Benghazi when he was obviously talking about himself, again.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

If Obama understood that the attack in Benghazi was an act of Terror unrelated to the movie, why did he spend 2 weeks claiming it was a direct result of the movie? Why did he send his Ambassador to the UN to say specifically it was caused by the movie?

Where were his briefings from the Intel agencies and the State Department all of whom have stated then knew right away it was a terrorist attack unrelated to the movie?

If the State Department knew it was a terror attack unrelated to the Movie why did they allow the UN Ambassador to say it was connected to the movie?

Because no one has said that it was unrelated to the movie.

Quite the contrary, ALL of the evidence is that the protest over the movie was used as a cover by the terrorists to make their hit.

But don't let facts get in the way of your whacky conspiracy theories, guy.

If it wasn't for the fact that the State Department has said that there was no protest before the attack you would have a point. In fact, the official timeline has Chris Stevens walking out the front door of the consulate shortly before the attack in order to say goodbye to a guest, and then going to bed. That would not have happened if there was a protest, the consulate would have been evacuated, just like the embassy in Cairo was.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

The Righties are doing their darndest to make this selectively quoted breitbart/drudge hit-piece stick.

All I keep seeing is a concerted effort to rewrite history on the part of the Obamazombies.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

If Obama understood that the attack in Benghazi was an act of Terror unrelated to the movie, why did he spend 2 weeks claiming it was a direct result of the movie? Why did he send his Ambassador to the UN to say specifically it was caused by the movie?

Where were his briefings from the Intel agencies and the State Department all of whom have stated then knew right away it was a terrorist attack unrelated to the movie?

If the State Department knew it was a terror attack unrelated to the Movie why did they allow the UN Ambassador to say it was connected to the movie?

Because no one has said that it was unrelated to the movie.

Quite the contrary, ALL of the evidence is that the protest over the movie was used as a cover by the terrorists to make their hit.

But don't let facts get in the way of your whacky conspiracy theories, guy.

There were no protests before terrorists made their hit, so how could they have been used for cover, dirtbag?

Joe has a selective grasp on facts.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

There were no protests before terrorists made their hit, so how could they have been used for cover, dirtbag?

There were protests after and there were protests before going on in Egypt...

So it's not unreasonable to assume the two were related. And you guys really haven't proven they weren't.

I mean, are you talking directly to the terrorists, to find out what their motivations were?

Wow you're retarded! How were protests in Egypt supposed to provide cover for an attack in Libya?

You have to understand that Joe thinks Libya is part of Cairo, just like Egypt is.

 

[Katzndogz]

obama had the narrative that once Bin Laden was dead, the war on terror was won, al quaeda was knocked out (something he has already stopped claiming) and the middle east no longer presented a threat. It isn't so much that the consulate in Benghazi was denied additional security. The security that they had was taken away. Security wasn't necessary, Libya was made happy at obama's word.

 

[buckeye45_73]

GREGORY: Well, let’s talk-- talk about-- well, you talked about this as spontaneous. Can you say definitively that the attacks on-- on our consulate in Libya that killed ambassador Stevens and others there security personnel, that was spontaneous, was it a planned attack? Was there a terrorist element to it?

MS. RICE: Well, let us-- let me tell you the-- the best information we have at present. First of all, there’s an FBI investigation which is ongoing. And we look to that investigation to give us the definitive word as to what transpired. But putting together the best information that we have available to us today our current assessment is that what happened in Benghazi was in fact initially a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired hours before in Cairo, almost a copycat of-- of the demonstrations against our facility in Cairo, which were prompted, of course, by the video. What we think then transpired in Benghazi is that opportunistic extremist elements came to the consulate as this was unfolding. They came with heavy weapons which unfortunately are readily available in post revolutionary Libya. And it escalated into a much more violent episode. Obviously, that’s-- that’s our best judgment now. We’ll await the results of the investigation. And the president has been very clear--we’ll work with the Libyan authorities to bring those responsible to justice.

September 16: Benjamin Netanyahu, Susan Rice, Keith Ellison, Peter King, Bob Woodward, Jeffrey Goldberg, Andrea Mitchell - Meet the Press - Transcripts | NBC News

And even today it's as clear as mud.

NYT: Libya attack suspect scoffs at US in plain sight - World news - The New York Times | NBC News

You cannot tell me intelligent people thougjt it was a video.

 

[GoneBezerk]

Obamination lied until he admitted he was lying because he thought they could use the video as a cover story for their fuck-ups in Libya.

Also, the salespitch these past few months is that terrorism is dead because "Obamination" killed UBL.

Well, it's kinda hard to keep throwing out that lie when the Ambassador was killed by "terrorists" in Libya, a place Obamination held up as part of his Arab Spring transformation.

Libya is all just a big distractiion to his campaign, "not optimal" for re-election and a big bump in the road so he thought he could cover up the terrorists messing things up there by lying to the American public.

Well, today he doesn't have the whole media crawling up his ass to hide, instead bloggers, FOXNews, etc actually go find the FACTs and expose them until he has to admit he is a fucking lying piece of shit. Oh, but fatass Candy did her part lying for him in the last debate so they aren't going down without a fight.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

GREGORY: Well, let’s talk-- talk about-- well, you talked about this as spontaneous. Can you say definitively that the attacks on-- on our consulate in Libya that killed ambassador Stevens and others there security personnel, that was spontaneous, was it a planned attack? Was there a terrorist element to it?

MS. RICE: Well, let us-- let me tell you the-- the best information we have at present. First of all, there’s an FBI investigation which is ongoing. And we look to that investigation to give us the definitive word as to what transpired. But putting together the best information that we have available to us today our current assessment is that what happened in Benghazi was in fact initially a spontaneous reaction to what had just transpired hours before in Cairo, almost a copycat of-- of the demonstrations against our facility in Cairo, which were prompted, of course, by the video. What we think then transpired in Benghazi is that opportunistic extremist elements came to the consulate as this was unfolding. They came with heavy weapons which unfortunately are readily available in post revolutionary Libya. And it escalated into a much more violent episode. Obviously, that’s-- that’s our best judgment now. We’ll await the results of the investigation. And the president has been very clear--we’ll work with the Libyan authorities to bring those responsible to justice.

September 16: Benjamin Netanyahu, Susan Rice, Keith Ellison, Peter King, Bob Woodward, Jeffrey Goldberg, Andrea Mitchell - Meet the Press - Transcripts | NBC News

And even today it's as clear as mud.

NYT: Libya attack suspect scoffs at US in plain sight - World news - The New York Times | NBC News

You cannot tell me intelligent people thougjt it was a video.

Are you saying Obama is not intelligent?