If Obama understood it was a terrorist attack?

[NYcarbineer]

Makes watergate look like a rose garden.

Watergate, ROTF. Next it's gonna be Obama's Waterloo too!

Anyone murdered, killed in watergate? Both had lies, deception, cover-ups did they not?

So which was worse, Watergate or Iran/Contra?

 

[Quantum Windbag]

He didn't. Was it when you were a Mormon that you learned that lying is a good thing?

Well, it isn't.

This is amazing. Weren't you one of the people posting all over the board claiming this was all about the video for two fracking weeks?

 

[AmericanFirst]

He didn't. Was it when you were a Mormon that you learned that lying is a good thing?

Well, it isn't.

Yes he did liar. But that is what the LEFT does so well, lies.

 

[AmericanFirst]

He didn't. Was it when you were a Mormon that you learned that lying is a good thing?

Well, it isn't.

This is amazing. Weren't you one of the people posting all over the board claiming this was all about the video for two fracking weeks?

She is a libtard with no morals. Therefore she would be lying. She should be the poster child for the lying left, oh wait, they got one, obamaturd.

 

[thanatos144]

Makes watergate look like a rose garden.

Watergate, ROTF. Next it's gonna be Obama's Waterloo too!

Do you even know what Watergate was about?

 

[NYcarbineer]

A chance for Obama to explain his self for all his fuck ups.


Read all about it...Obama spins and lies!!!!


Time line of lies!

Obama's Benghazi Lies - Home

Destroys Obama's case. It wasn't about a fucking terrorist attack, BUT the protest over our freedom of speech.

On the 13th he was talking about the protest when he said terrorized.

Susan Rice said on the 16th that this wasn't a pre-planned attack. LIES

On the 18th Obama went on the letterman show and blamed our first amendment for the attack. LIES!!!

If the terrorized was supposed to mean a terrorist attack. Well, Obama sure inserted his foot in his ass.

Clinton on the 21st was the first to say it was a Terrorist attack. SPIN!

Obama on the view on the 25th said it was about the fucking video! Spin some more!!!

Carney maintains Libya attack was not preplanned - YouTube

Who is responsible for the attack in Benghazi? - YouTube




Biden blatantly lied about Chris Stevens wanting more Security
The Fact Checker


“We weren’t told they wanted more security there. We did not know they wanted more security.”

— Biden, speaking of the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya

Biden’s bold statement was directly contradicted by State Department officials just this week, in testimony before a congressional panel and in unclassified cables released by a congressional committee.

“All of us at post were in sync that we wanted these resources,” said Eric Nordstrom, the top regional security officer in Libya earlier this year. A Utah national guardsman who led a security team, Lt. Col. Andrew Wood, said: “We felt great frustration that those requests were ignored or just never met.”



September 12, 2012 - President Obama Speaks on Libya Attacks that killed US Ambassador Chris Stevens - YouTube

@ 5:00-6:20 you can hear the context in which he mentioned terrorism, Romney was correct in his assertation as, in context, Obama was referring to terrorism in general and not specifically the attack
====

Candy wasn't even right here as Obama said "terror" in the context of the protest.



Crowley to Axelrod: Obama Never Said Benghazi Attack Was 'Act of Terror
Breitbart ^ | 17 Oct 2012, 3:44 AM PDT | Tony Lee
Crowley to Axelrod: Obama Never Said Benghazi Attack Was 'Act of Terror'

On CNN's "State of the Union" on September 30, Candy Crowley insisted David Axelrod, President Barack Obama's chief strategist, was wrong when Axelrod tried to claim President Barack Obama called the Benghazi attack "an act of terror" on the day after.
"First, they said it was not planned, it was part of this tape," Crowley said when Axelrod tried to spin her.
This was Crowley the journalist, unlike the pro-Obama advocate who moderated Tuesday's debate between Obama and Mitt Romney and interjected herself into an argument between Obama and Romney on the exact same issue -- and took Obama's side.
During the debate, Crowley affirmed Obama's assertion that he referred to the Benghazi attacks as acts of terror on the day after.
After Romney correctly said it took Obama 14 days before Obama said the the Benghazi attacks were acts of terror, Crowley took Obama's side -- to an ovation from the town hall audience -- and she proclaimed Obama had indeed claimed the Benghazi attacks were acts of terror the day after the attacks in the White House Rose Garden.
On September 12, the day after the attacks, Obama did say the words "acts of terror" but he was not referring to the attacks that killed U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens.
Crowley knew that on September 30 and she conceded it again hours after the debate when she went on CNN and said while Romney "was right in the main, but he just chose the wrong word." But the damage had already been done.
With Obama's reelection on the line, Crowley seemed to have conveniently forgotten the facts she knew two weeks before when she grilled Axelrod in a way she should have Obama.

---
Yet we learn today that Stevens was begging for months for security??? WTF is wrong with the Obama Admin. If you leftist had any honor you wouldn't vote for Obama.


Documents show Stevens worried about Libya security threats, Al Qaeda before consulate attack
Fox News ^ | 10-19-2012 | James Rosen
Documents show Stevens worried about Libya security threats, Al Qaeda before consulate attack | Fox News

Across 166 pages of internal State Department documents -- released Friday by a pair of Republican congressmen pressing the Obama administration for more answers on the Benghazi terrorist attack -- slain U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and the security officers assigned to protect him repeatedly sounded alarms to their superiors in Washington about the intensifying lawlessness and violence in Eastern Libya, where Stevens ultimately died.

On Sept. 11 -- the day Stevens and three other Americans were killed -- the ambassador signed a three-page cable, labeled "sensitive," in which he noted "growing problems with security" in Benghazi and "growing frustration" on the part of local residents with Libyan police and security forces. These forces the ambassador characterized as "too weak to keep the country secure."

You're an idiot. In his rose garden statement the president preceded AND followed his reference to 'acts of terror' with specific references to the Benghazi attack and to the four Americans who were killed.

You have to be an idiot to deny he was calling it a terrorist attack.

 

[JoeB131]

If Obama understood that the attack in Benghazi was an act of Terror unrelated to the movie, why did he spend 2 weeks claiming it was a direct result of the movie? Why did he send his Ambassador to the UN to say specifically it was caused by the movie?

Where were his briefings from the Intel agencies and the State Department all of whom have stated then knew right away it was a terrorist attack unrelated to the movie?

If the State Department knew it was a terror attack unrelated to the Movie why did they allow the UN Ambassador to say it was connected to the movie?

Because no one has said that it was unrelated to the movie.

Quite the contrary, ALL of the evidence is that the protest over the movie was used as a cover by the terrorists to make their hit.

But don't let facts get in the way of your whacky conspiracy theories, guy.

 

[Dot Com]

The Righties are doing their darndest to make this selectively quoted breitbart/drudge hit-piece stick.

 

[BlueGin]

Obama's actions since the attack and the cover-up lies that have been and still are being floated as excuses for Obama....prove beyond all doubt that Obama cares more about fund raising and playing golf than he does about national security.

His first priority, his sworn duty is to PROTECT THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES. He has done a miserable job of it, has shown his preference for personal gain over protecting the nation and its embassy staffs, has lied repeatedly about the cause of the attack...and shows no remorse regarding his negligence of duty.

The above, by itself is enough to make any sane American citizen want to kick his sorry ass down the road. But we still have the Obamabots, the leeches, the professional voters, the Kool-Aid drinking worshipers of Mr. Cool and the died-in-the-wool racists that will vote for him regardless of what he does between now and November.

Have you seen his political ads? Specifically the one narrated by Morgan Freeman...still touting the "he killed Bin Laden" mantra? Yep...what a load of hooey. It's like we are to ignore the Embassy attack and pretend we weren't watching when that happened.

 

[Rocko]

Not to belabor the point, but our president is cowardly liar, and anyone who suggests otherwise is a cowardly liar as well.

 

[Rocko]

If Obama understood that the attack in Benghazi was an act of Terror unrelated to the movie, why did he spend 2 weeks claiming it was a direct result of the movie? Why did he send his Ambassador to the UN to say specifically it was caused by the movie?

Where were his briefings from the Intel agencies and the State Department all of whom have stated then knew right away it was a terrorist attack unrelated to the movie?

If the State Department knew it was a terror attack unrelated to the Movie why did they allow the UN Ambassador to say it was connected to the movie?

Because no one has said that it was unrelated to the movie.

Quite the contrary, ALL of the evidence is that the protest over the movie was used as a cover by the terrorists to make their hit.

But don't let facts get in the way of your whacky conspiracy theories, guy.

There were no protests before terrorists made their hit, so how could they have been used for cover, dirtbag?

 

[SniperFire]

State Department just released a bunch of documents. Chris Stevens had been begging for months for more security and the State Department offical said they felt like a "broken record" in denying the requests. Hilary wanted to Normalize relations in Benghazi.. I guess they're normal now but not nominal. huh?

Normal but not optimal.

 

[JoeB131]

If Obama understood that the attack in Benghazi was an act of Terror unrelated to the movie, why did he spend 2 weeks claiming it was a direct result of the movie? Why did he send his Ambassador to the UN to say specifically it was caused by the movie?

Where were his briefings from the Intel agencies and the State Department all of whom have stated then knew right away it was a terrorist attack unrelated to the movie?

If the State Department knew it was a terror attack unrelated to the Movie why did they allow the UN Ambassador to say it was connected to the movie?

Because no one has said that it was unrelated to the movie.

Quite the contrary, ALL of the evidence is that the protest over the movie was used as a cover by the terrorists to make their hit.

But don't let facts get in the way of your whacky conspiracy theories, guy.

There were no protests before terrorists made their hit, so how could they have been used for cover, dirtbag?

There were protests after and there were protests before going on in Egypt...

So it's not unreasonable to assume the two were related. And you guys really haven't proven they weren't.

I mean, are you talking directly to the terrorists, to find out what their motivations were?

 

[Rocko]

Because no one has said that it was unrelated to the movie.

Quite the contrary, ALL of the evidence is that the protest over the movie was used as a cover by the terrorists to make their hit.

But don't let facts get in the way of your whacky conspiracy theories, guy.

There were no protests before terrorists made their hit, so how could they have been used for cover, dirtbag?

There were protests after and there were protests before going on in Egypt...

So it's not unreasonable to assume the two were related. And you guys really haven't proven they weren't.

I mean, are you talking directly to the terrorists, to find out what their motivations were?

Wow you're retarded! How were protests in Egypt supposed to provide cover for an attack in Libya?

 

[AmericanFirst]

A chance for Obama to explain his self for all his fuck ups.


Read all about it...Obama spins and lies!!!!


Time line of lies!

Obama's Benghazi Lies - Home

Destroys Obama's case. It wasn't about a fucking terrorist attack, BUT the protest over our freedom of speech.

On the 13th he was talking about the protest when he said terrorized.

Susan Rice said on the 16th that this wasn't a pre-planned attack. LIES

On the 18th Obama went on the letterman show and blamed our first amendment for the attack. LIES!!!

If the terrorized was supposed to mean a terrorist attack. Well, Obama sure inserted his foot in his ass.

Clinton on the 21st was the first to say it was a Terrorist attack. SPIN!

Obama on the view on the 25th said it was about the fucking video! Spin some more!!!

Carney maintains Libya attack was not preplanned - YouTube

Who is responsible for the attack in Benghazi? - YouTube




Biden blatantly lied about Chris Stevens wanting more Security
The Fact Checker


“We weren’t told they wanted more security there. We did not know they wanted more security.”

— Biden, speaking of the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya

Biden’s bold statement was directly contradicted by State Department officials just this week, in testimony before a congressional panel and in unclassified cables released by a congressional committee.

“All of us at post were in sync that we wanted these resources,” said Eric Nordstrom, the top regional security officer in Libya earlier this year. A Utah national guardsman who led a security team, Lt. Col. Andrew Wood, said: “We felt great frustration that those requests were ignored or just never met.”



September 12, 2012 - President Obama Speaks on Libya Attacks that killed US Ambassador Chris Stevens - YouTube

@ 5:00-6:20 you can hear the context in which he mentioned terrorism, Romney was correct in his assertation as, in context, Obama was referring to terrorism in general and not specifically the attack
====

Candy wasn't even right here as Obama said "terror" in the context of the protest.



Crowley to Axelrod: Obama Never Said Benghazi Attack Was 'Act of Terror
Breitbart ^ | 17 Oct 2012, 3:44 AM PDT | Tony Lee
Crowley to Axelrod: Obama Never Said Benghazi Attack Was 'Act of Terror'

On CNN's "State of the Union" on September 30, Candy Crowley insisted David Axelrod, President Barack Obama's chief strategist, was wrong when Axelrod tried to claim President Barack Obama called the Benghazi attack "an act of terror" on the day after.
"First, they said it was not planned, it was part of this tape," Crowley said when Axelrod tried to spin her.
This was Crowley the journalist, unlike the pro-Obama advocate who moderated Tuesday's debate between Obama and Mitt Romney and interjected herself into an argument between Obama and Romney on the exact same issue -- and took Obama's side.
During the debate, Crowley affirmed Obama's assertion that he referred to the Benghazi attacks as acts of terror on the day after.
After Romney correctly said it took Obama 14 days before Obama said the the Benghazi attacks were acts of terror, Crowley took Obama's side -- to an ovation from the town hall audience -- and she proclaimed Obama had indeed claimed the Benghazi attacks were acts of terror the day after the attacks in the White House Rose Garden.
On September 12, the day after the attacks, Obama did say the words "acts of terror" but he was not referring to the attacks that killed U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens.
Crowley knew that on September 30 and she conceded it again hours after the debate when she went on CNN and said while Romney "was right in the main, but he just chose the wrong word." But the damage had already been done.
With Obama's reelection on the line, Crowley seemed to have conveniently forgotten the facts she knew two weeks before when she grilled Axelrod in a way she should have Obama.

---
Yet we learn today that Stevens was begging for months for security??? WTF is wrong with the Obama Admin. If you leftist had any honor you wouldn't vote for Obama.


Documents show Stevens worried about Libya security threats, Al Qaeda before consulate attack
Fox News ^ | 10-19-2012 | James Rosen
Documents show Stevens worried about Libya security threats, Al Qaeda before consulate attack | Fox News

Across 166 pages of internal State Department documents -- released Friday by a pair of Republican congressmen pressing the Obama administration for more answers on the Benghazi terrorist attack -- slain U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens and the security officers assigned to protect him repeatedly sounded alarms to their superiors in Washington about the intensifying lawlessness and violence in Eastern Libya, where Stevens ultimately died.

On Sept. 11 -- the day Stevens and three other Americans were killed -- the ambassador signed a three-page cable, labeled "sensitive," in which he noted "growing problems with security" in Benghazi and "growing frustration" on the part of local residents with Libyan police and security forces. These forces the ambassador characterized as "too weak to keep the country secure."

You're an idiot. In his rose garden statement the president preceded AND followed his reference to 'acts of terror' with specific references to the Benghazi attack and to the four Americans who were killed.

You have to be an idiot to deny he was calling it a terrorist attack.

No he did not call Benghazi a terror attack, I watched the video. Stop lying liar.

 

[AmericanFirst]

f+f? The atf chief said neither the booosh or obama administration were told what was going on. Total pubcrappe, for dupes only.

idiot!!!!

 

[EriktheRed]

The Righties are doing their darndest to make this selectively quoted breitbart/drudge hit-piece stick.

Like I said elsewhere, they don't have shit else at this point.

 

[Katzndogz]

If Obama understood that the attack in Benghazi was an act of Terror unrelated to the movie, why did he spend 2 weeks claiming it was a direct result of the movie? Why did he send his Ambassador to the UN to say specifically it was caused by the movie?

Where were his briefings from the Intel agencies and the State Department all of whom have stated then knew right away it was a terrorist attack unrelated to the movie?

If the State Department knew it was a terror attack unrelated to the Movie why did they allow the UN Ambassador to say it was connected to the movie?

Romney will make sure it all comes out Monday night. Stay tuned. Those are the question the whole lot of them have been side-stepping. Fund raising and golf are Obama's priorities.

It would have come out last Tuesday if Crowley hadn't stepped in, lied, and saved obama's ass.

 

[JoeB131]

If Obama understood that the attack in Benghazi was an act of Terror unrelated to the movie, why did he spend 2 weeks claiming it was a direct result of the movie? Why did he send his Ambassador to the UN to say specifically it was caused by the movie?

Where were his briefings from the Intel agencies and the State Department all of whom have stated then knew right away it was a terrorist attack unrelated to the movie?

If the State Department knew it was a terror attack unrelated to the Movie why did they allow the UN Ambassador to say it was connected to the movie?

Romney will make sure it all comes out Monday night. Stay tuned. Those are the question the whole lot of them have been side-stepping. Fund raising and golf are Obama's priorities.

It would have come out last Tuesday if Crowley hadn't stepped in, lied, and saved obama's ass.

The truth bitchslapped Romney down. He claimed Obama didn't call it terror, when it was called terror from the very beginning.

Just like the truth slapped Ryan down when he asked why there wasn't enough security, and they pointed out the GOP Cut 400 million for State's security budget.

 

[BreezeWood]

If Obama understood that the attack in Benghazi was an act of Terror unrelated to the movie, why did he spend 2 weeks claiming it was a direct result of the movie? Why did he send his Ambassador to the UN to say specifically it was caused by the movie?

Where were his briefings from the Intel agencies and the State Department all of whom have stated then knew right away it was a terrorist attack unrelated to the movie?

If the State Department knew it was a terror attack unrelated to the Movie why did they allow the UN Ambassador to say it was connected to the movie?

Romney will make sure it all comes out Monday night. Stay tuned. Those are the question the whole lot of them have been side-stepping. Fund raising and golf are Obama's priorities.

It would have come out last Tuesday if Crowley hadn't stepped in, lied, and saved obama's ass.

Video - Breaking News Videos from CNN.com


the interview clearly corroborates all the White House has said about Benghazi.

it is really just a matter of whether the American people will believe the Republican politically motivated version or the Truth.