If homos have a constitutional right to marry, why don't siblings.??

That's not it. They want an easier time adopting kids to molest. THINK

Why do you think the LGBpbWTF bunch is so intent on having such sick stuff as this and this taught to young children in school, starting in Kindergarten?

It certainly is apparent that a very likely motive is to condition young kids to be easier prey for all manner of sexual abuse.
Catholics don't prepare their children for the sexual abuse they are about to suffer.

Could give them a heads up.
 
Seriously for a moment. This is a serious question to Christians. What does the bible say about f***ing your sister?

Exactly the same thing that it says about one man f***ing another man. In the same chapter, even.

Leviticus 18:9,22
9 The nakedness of thy sister, the daughter of thy father, or daughter of thy mother, whether she be born at home, or born abroad, even their nakedness thou shalt not uncover.
·
·
·
22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
 
But siblings can say the same thing. You don't understand what this thread is about.
I do. It's not right to marry your sibling. It's incest and that's illegal.

It is not any less wrong, any less immoral, any less perverted, for a man to “marry” another man, or for a woman to “marry” another woman. Homoseuxality is not any less sick or evil than incest is; and there is no legitimate reason why government should uphold one of these evils, and not the other.
 
why does it matter that they were unelected? that's the way we choose our supreme court justices. always has been. what's the problem with that?

A legitimate government, in accordance with this nation's founding principles, has to be accountable to the people who are governed, and subject to their will.

The courts are not accountable to the people, therefore, it is not legitimate that they should have nearly as much power over the people as the have usurped.
 
The courts are not accountable to the people, therefore, it is not legitimate that they should have nearly as much power over the people as the have usurped.

And the constitution agrees with you. Courts cannot write laws. The very first words of the constitution after the preamble are "all legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a congress of the united states".
 
Seriously for a moment. This is a serious question to Christians. What does the bible say about f***ing your sister?

Exactly the same thing that it says about one man f***ing another man. In the same chapter, even.

Leviticus 18:9,22
9 The nakedness of thy sister, the daughter of thy father, or daughter of thy mother, whether she be born at home, or born abroad, even their nakedness thou shalt not uncover.
·
·
·
22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
Gee! Is every thing in Leviticus to be held as law? My garden has peppers growing right next to tomatoes. Am I breaking God's law? What about the cheeseburger I had for lunch? I guess that's another of God's laws I broke!

I am wearing a cotton polyester blend t shirt right now. Oops! There goes another of God's laws!

I'm not sure how righteous I should be. Amish righteous? Orthodox Jew righteous? Sunni righteous? Or poorly educated Christian righteous?
 
lol if you want to campaign on allowing incest than go right ahead. It's your right to do so.

Sibling marriage makes a lot more sense than queer marriage.
To an ignorant Appalachian hillbilly, I suppose that's true

images


Why????? Because you consider it icky? Where have I heard that before?...... Oh!!!!! From the SSM crowd!

Does that make you a bigoted hypocrite?

*****CHUCKLE*****



:)
 
lol if you want to campaign on allowing incest than go right ahead. It's your right to do so.

Sibling marriage makes a lot more sense than queer marriage.
To an ignorant Appalachian hillbilly, I suppose that's true

images


Why????? Because you consider it icky? Where have I heard that before?...... Oh!!!!! From the SSM crowd!

Does that make you a bigoted hypocrite?

*****CHUCKLE*****



:)

Here's a tip on making your posts more palpable: try making sense.
 
Seriously for a moment. This is a serious question to Christians. What does the bible say about f***ing your sister?

Exactly the same thing that it says about one man f***ing another man. In the same chapter, even.

Leviticus 18:9,22
9 The nakedness of thy sister, the daughter of thy father, or daughter of thy mother, whether she be born at home, or born abroad, even their nakedness thou shalt not uncover.
·
·
·
22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination.
Ancient myths and fables have nothing to do with any of this, it's all legally and Constitutionally irrelevant.

That gay Americans have the 14th Amendment right to enter into marriage contracts is a matter of the law, not religion.
 
lol if you want to campaign on allowing incest than go right ahead. It's your right to do so.

Sibling marriage makes a lot more sense than queer marriage.
To an ignorant Appalachian hillbilly, I suppose that's true

images


Why????? Because you consider it icky? Where have I heard that before?...... Oh!!!!! From the SSM crowd!

Does that make you a bigoted hypocrite?

*****CHUCKLE*****



:)

Here's a tip on making your posts more palpable: try making sense.


images


If you don't understand the argument/issue then perhaps you shouldn't be posting here.

*****CHUCKLE*****



:)
 
Try it. Go down to the court house and ask for a marriage licence for you and your sister. If refused then start through the process. There is absolutely nothing I see in the law, now, the would bar you from marring your sister. So go for it..

Well I don't know what state you live in- but in every state I know of, it is still illegal for Shootie to marry his sister.

But- if he really thinks he should be able to- or if you think you should be able to marry your sister- you can try- and then when refused you have the right to sue- and come up with your argument as to why you should be able to marry your sister.

Let us know how that turns out.
 
[
LOL you have brought this up over and over.
Your inability to understand is not everyone else's problem.
Fact is that you don't have a clue what the Supreme Court ruled- and are unlikely to ever understand why.

The board notes you never addressed the issue and just called me stupid. Thanks for admitting you have no argument.

No- I didn't just call you stupid- you are just so stupid that is your interpretation.

I said you had made this same claim before- and your inability to understand is not everyone else's problem.

Fact is that you don't have a clue what the Supreme Court ruled- as you demonstrate every time you start up another thread about how you believe this now means you can marry your sibling.
 
Sex isn't a problem because as I understand it the whole reason that gays wanted to marry is for economic reasons..

That's not it. They want an easier time adopting kids to molest. THINK

So you think the reason people get marry is so that it will be easier to adopt children to molest?

You have a really sick view of marriage.

I do hope for everyone's sake that you never marry.
 
15th post
[

Why bother with the legislature, much easier to have 5 old men and women make law.

Yup - and it's 5 UNELECTED old men and women on the SCOTUS who have given themselves the power to make law even though the constitution says only congress can do that.

The Supreme Court has never made law.

You are just showing your ignorance again.
 
Wouldn't the OP be better served filing lawsuits and pushing his representatives to make this come to pass? That takes work though and whining on the web is so much easier.

Why bother with the legislature, much easier to have 5 old men and women make law.

Not this tried tripe again? No law was made. You can stomp your feet and claim otherwise until the cows come home but it doesn't change reality. Besides, what you suggest requires years of work and loads of money but like I said whining on the internet is far easier.

Your whine is superb. Law was made. Could gays marry before the ruling? Could they after? What law was changed? You can call it tripe but the truth never goes away.

Now, would you like to talk about corporations being people?

I have nothing to whine about as my side won the battle. What is the law number? Oh wait, it does exist as no law was created. You'll get over it but the meantime I do enjoy watching these hissy fits.

Then gays can't get married? I agree, no law was changed but gays can get married how in the hell does that work in liberal land? The SCOTUS made law with their ruling, that is fact.

Were you actually asleep when the Supreme Court announced their ruling.

The Court said that laws that made it illegal for same gender couples to marry are unconstitutional.

Such laws are null and void.

The Supreme Court no more made a law by ruling that a law was unconstitutional than I went to the store when I decided not to go to the store.
 
Try it. Go down to the court house and ask for a marriage licence for you and your sister. If refused then start through the process. There is absolutely nothing I see in the law, now, the would bar you from marring your sister. So go for it..

Well I don't know what state you live in- but in every state I know of, it is still illegal for Shootie to marry his sister.

But- if he really thinks he should be able to- or if you think you should be able to marry your sister- you can try- and then when refused you have the right to sue- and come up with your argument as to why you should be able to marry your sister.

Let us know how that turns out.

images


So you're saying that the courts violated the 14th Amendment and Civil Rights Act by granting special privileges to a specific minority group over others and that you're fine with it?

*****CHUCKLE*****



:)
 
Not this tried tripe again? No law was made. r.

HAHAHA. Listen to this fool. The SCOTUS ordered states to accept queer marriage but he says they didn't pass a law!!!

God you really are this stupid.

The Supreme Court said that state laws that banned marriages between same gender couples were unconstitutional- just like the Supreme Court said that state laws that banned mixed race marriages were unconstitutional.
 
Back
Top Bottom