If Hilary wins who will be umm..the first lady ?

[red states rule]

Was it everything the Republicans speak of as if they're against?

YES!

Unlike the libs - was there a crime committed?

When Republicans are caught breaking the law - they are gone

Unlike libs where it is considered a resume enhancement

 

[no1tovote4]

Was it everything the Republicans speak of as if they're against?

YES!

Was he re-elected? No.

 

[manu1959]

let us call him the first cigar...............

 

[JeffWartman]

Was he re-elected? No.

He WON his elections to the very end...he resigned after pressure from the Democrats.

So what's your point?

 

[no1tovote4]

He WON his elections to the very end...he resigned after pressure from the Democrats.

So what's your point?

He resigned before he ran after he was going to be caught out with the affair. His last affair wasn't outted until after he resigned.

Why did he not run again? Because he knew he would not be re-elected.

You keep suggesting that somehow he would be a hero of the right. He was in some areas, such as small-goverment policy, but not in others.

One of their number goes and actually breaks the law with an intern in his office, he gets a standing-O on the floor of the House. One of the R's number, he immediately resigns and he hadn't broke a law. To say that they act the same when such things are found would be a misnomer of tremendous size.

 

[wiggles]

How exactly would that work? Would Bill Clinton be the first first Man? Im serious, how in the hell would that work?

dumb question

 

[red states rule]

dumb question

The dumb question is will Hillary actually win in November when 50% of the voters say they will not vote for her

 

[Care4all]

Was he re-elected? No.

Did he run?

No.

Not because of any republicans choice, they wanted him to run and they purposely kept quiet on ALL of the indiscretions of Foley's with these young pages so that he could run for the Congressional position in Florida.

The whole thing was shameful.



--------------------------------

And Studds had an affair with a 17 year old in DC, so he too did NOT break the law....(though absolutely shameful and an abuse of power imo) this relationship with this page continued for almost a decade, they lived with eachother I believe....this page continued to support Studds and said that Studds did NOT seduce him....that they "loved" eachother.

And though Gerry Studds abused his power imho, I still see what Foley did as worse....he prayed on MANY YOUNG BOYS, he was not pursuing any kind of permanent relationship, but only persuing getting his rocks off and using these young men to do it....

I could be wrong, but that is how it appears to me.

care

 

[red states rule]

Dems sat on the Foley emails for months - and waited until a month from the election to release them

 

[maineman]

The dumb question is will Hillary actually win in November when 50% of the voters say they will not vote for her

let's wait and see...clearly, your prognosticating ability is suspect......

 

[red states rule]

let's wait and see...clearly, your prognosticating ability is suspect......

Not when polls shows 50% will not vote for Hillary

Time will tell - Hillary has released the dogs on Obama - it will be fun to watch

 

[Care4all]

Dems sat on the Foley emails for months - and waited until a month from the election to release them

That's not quite true...

The Whistle blower group, gave these emails to the FBI in June/July...a good 5 months before the election....they turned them over to Law enforcement...but guess what?

The FBI did nothing with them...nothing came out in the news, no repremand of any sort on Foley etc....

Then, this same group that turned these emails over to the FBI released them to the public months LATER because the FBI did nothing....

--------------------------------------------------

In addition to this Red, the Republicans in power had near a decade's worth of complaints and abuses of Foley's being reported....they knew Foley had a problem with young men/pages...he had repeated offenses reported to them, to the Republican Leadership, and they CHOSE to run Foley in the next election anyway...

Now that is not GOOD imo and many others also.

Care

 

[red states rule]

History of Foley Messages' Release Clarified by Players
2 Sources Explain Motives, Citing Concern for Hill's Pages

By Jonathan Weisman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, October 11, 2006; Page A04

Two of the news media's sources of Mark Foley's sexually explicit instant messages to former House pages said this week that they came forward to expose the Florida congressman's actions, not to help the Democrats in the midterm elections.

But there are indications that Democrats spent months circulating five less insidious Foley e-mails to news organizations before they were finally published by ABC News late last month, which prompted the leaking of the more salacious instant messages. Harper's Magazine said yesterday that it obtained the five e-mails from a Democratic Party operative, albeit in May, long before the election season.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/10/AR2006101001379.html

 

[no1tovote4]

Did he run?

No.

Not because of any republicans choice, they wanted him to run and they purposely kept quiet on ALL of the indiscretions of Foley's with these young pages so that he could run for the Congressional position in Florida.

The whole thing was shameful.



--------------------------------

And Studds had an affair with a 17 year old in DC, so he too did NOT break the law....(though absolutely shameful and an abuse of power imo) this relationship with this page continued for almost a decade, they lived with eachother I believe....this page continued to support Studds and said that Studds did NOT seduce him....that they "loved" eachother.

And though Gerry Studds abused his power imho, I still see what Foley did as worse....he prayed on MANY YOUNG BOYS, he was not pursuing any kind of permanent relationship, but only persuing getting his rocks off and using these young men to do it....

I could be wrong, but that is how it appears to me.

care

It was. As was the clapterfest for the democrat congressman who actually did sleep with his intern. This attempt to disassociate with the Ds own hypocrisy on this matter is very telling on how far people will go to forgive their own and castigate "the enemy". It perpetuates an atmosphere where Statesmen are considered "traitors" to their party and just slams that wedge in tighter. Keep it up, we need more division in government.

 

[red states rule]

If not for their double standards Dems would have no standards at all

 

[mattskramer]

Not when polls shows 50% will not vote for Hillary

Time will tell - Hillary has released the dogs on Obama - it will be fun to watch

According to several polls, Hillary might win the presidency.

 

[no1tovote4]

According to several polls, Hillary might win the presidency.

Seriously, I hope she is your nominee. I really hope she is.

 

[Annie]

Seriously, I hope she is your nominee. I really hope she is.

Yes, her or Dennis K.

 

[Paul Revere]

The dumb question is will Hillary actually win in November when 50% of the voters say they will not vote for her

Voters do not determine the outcome of elections. Vote counters determine the outcome of elections.

 

[wiggles]

blah blah Fox "News" talking point blah blah

Dumb person.