Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
it's gonna be the second playboy mansion.With clinton as the first genltleman, he will influence alot of people and make some changes. Also he will use the white house budget wisely, like on a beer fountain, and strippers.
I'm fairly certain Bill will be very helpful in the things for which Hillary was so notable, such as firing travel department staff.
What I think will be truly fascinating is what the role of the First Gentleman (whenever we have the 1st female president), will be.
Traditionally, the role of the First Lady has been a diplomatic and intensely "feminine" role. She has entertained other diplomats wives, decorated the White House, held luncheons on issues that have primarily been viewed as "female-centered," visited day-cares, hugged children in hospitals, chosen the theme for the White House Christmas decorations.
Is a man going to be willing to take such a back-seat role? OR is the role going to be absorbed by presidential secretaries because the husband of such a powerful woman would most likely be someone with a fairly high-powered job himself?
It will be interesting to see...I just hope that we aren't seeing Bill Clinton tell us that the White House Christmas theme is going to be "Winter Intern Wonderland."
I think that Bill gets a big job in her administration.... Ambassador to the UN or Secretary of State come to mind.
I'm fairly certain Bill will be very helpful in the things for which Hillary was so notable, such as firing travel department staff.
At least Clinton had women he messed around with and not male prostitutes like Bush let hang around the white house. Or child molestors like Mark foley.
OWNED !!!!!
At least Clinton had women he messed around with and not male prostitutes like Bush let hang around the white house. Or child molestors like Mark foley.
OWNED !!!!!
Mark Foley hung around the White House?
that says a lot about the back game republicans are playing these days when their argument is reduced to quibbling about the age of consent for predatory gay republican congressmen to have their way with young pages...
that's the talking point now, isn't it? Foley didn't do anything ILLEGAL...there is nothing ILLEGAL with powerful gay republican congressmen praying on young boys whose parents have sent them to the capital to serve their country as long as the boys are over 16, which is the LEGAL age of consent in DC....Yeah.... that makes everything just fine.
Hey, I'm just saying. As I stated, I'm glad Foley is gone. I never once defended his actions, I think he's a sleaze (or is that "sleeze?"). I'm sure he was hoping to get lucky. To our knowledge, except for the e-mails and IMs, nothing happened, he was forced to resign and now lives with the shame. The country now knows that he preys on young men. This is a far cry from the reception Gerry Studds recieved on the floor of the Senate.
When was he convicted? My understanding was he only sent sordid e-mails and IMs. Not to mention the fact that the age of consent in DC is 16, which would mean he actually did nothing illegal at all. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad he's gone, he should not have been in a position to do what he did, but he's no Gerry Studds.
And republicans gave democrats shit about Studds and - obviously still do..... so suck it up, and expect to get what you dished out.
Methinks one ought not to stake out the moral high ground if one cannot hold it.
Libs give there own a pass everytime
And Republicans don't do the same thing????
Newt Gingrich served his first wife divorce papers while she was dying of cancer in a hospital.
How is THAT Christian? How does THAT show family values?
And Republicans don't do the same thing????
Newt Gingrich served his first wife divorce papers while she was dying of cancer in a hospital.
How is THAT Christian? How does THAT show family values?
Was it perjury?
No
Was it a crime?
No
Was it tacky?
Yes