If he comes anywhere near her on stage…

[playtime]

That's pretty much what happened to J D. Vance when he tried to enter a furniture showroom. The tackled him and hauled him off to a back office.

 

[Arlette]

There are some good looking couches out there

 

[playtime]

There are some good looking couches out there

wonder if he's got a preference ... lazy boy perhaps?

... not that there's anything with that ....

 

[Arlette]

wonder if he's got a preference ... lazy boy perhaps?

... not that there's anything with that ....

He prefers a slightly sloped armrest on the couch according to my sources.

 

[playtime]

He prefers a slightly sloped armrest on the couch according to my sources.

so his diet mountain dew can balance.

 

[my2¢]

There are some good looking couches out there

I've no idea what that is about and am ever so grateful I've avoided the media's coverage of politics.

 

[Arlette]

I've no idea what that is about and am ever so grateful I've avoided the media's coverage of politics.

J D Vance is a couch fucker. That's what this is all about.

 

[playtime]

J D Vance is a couch fucker. That's what this is all about.

& i'll bet he was on that couch when he googled dolphin porn.

 

[BULLDOG]

I didn't say re-written, but nice try. I said abused.

If you can't even refrain from lying about this type of shit, you are useless and pathetic.

How do you abuse a law? Either you are required to obey it, or you are not.

 

[martybegan]

How do you abuse a law? Either you are required to obey it, or you are not.

Abuse the prosecution of the law?

As the Scottsboro boys, or Leo Frank.

 

[BULLDOG]

Abuse the prosecution of the law?

As the Scottsboro boys, or Leo Frank.

Not sure what unconstitutional behavior by the courts nearly 100 years ago, and a lynching almost 150 years ago have to do with trump being held responsible for his broken laws. Come back with a ruling that the laws he broke are unconstitutional, and you might have something.

 

[ThisIsMe]

If you find 20 people who have made descriptive statements to multiple sources showing exactly how Harris stole the cars, then it would mean she did it. Because these women detail their encounters. 20 women are not going to make fake allegations of rape.

If you find 20 people who have made descriptive statements to multiple sources showing exactly how Harris stole the cars, then it would mean she did it.

No it wouldn’t, and that’s my point. Evidence is still required.

You can find 20 people to come up with elaborate stories of how someone did something, but it still has to be proven.

If those 20 women have proof that trump raped them, then they should bring it to court and have it proven there.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Yes we do. From more than 20 women.

Really? Where there evidence?

 

[martybegan]

Not sure what unconstitutional behavior by the courts nearly 100 years ago, and a lynching almost 150 years ago have to do with trump being held responsible for his broken laws. Come back with a ruling that the laws he broke are unconstitutional, and you might have something.

Prosecutorial misconduct is the same no matter the time or the place.

 

[BULLDOG]

Prosecutorial misconduct is the same no matter the time or the place.

You need to prove that. Whining because you lost just isn't enough.

 

[martybegan]

You need to prove that. Whining because you lost just isn't enough.

No, I don't. It's obvious to everyone who's not a left wing hack.

 

[BULLDOG]

No, I don't. It's obvious to everyone who's not a left wing hack.

If it's that obvious, then winning in court should be easy for you.

 

[martybegan]

If it's that obvious, then winning in court should be easy for you.

Not when the courts are in the bag.