“If a loving father wants to marry off his nine-year-old daughter to a righteous man and all parties consent, what is the issue with that?”

[Dagoth-Ur]

I am now only 5 minutes into a netflix film and I think the title in English is probably "Scouts Honour". Have you seen it? If you have don't tell me too much about it because I'm watching it now for myself. Now ..... I'm going back in.

Not what I asked communist.

 

[GLASNOST]

Not what I asked communist.

Oh, for ****'s sake.

 

[Doc7505]

Send them all back ASAP.

This is degeneracy that we have allowed into America and in large numbers.

<~~~~~~>
Indeed, we protect our children from atrocities like this by law. We also protect female children from the mutilation called female circumcision that Muslims practice.
Female Genital Multination (FGM) is practiced predominantly in certain Muslim communities, particularly in parts of Africa and the Middle East. However, it is also found among some Christian and animist groups.
Social Pressures:
The continuation of FGM is often influenced by cultural traditions, social pressures, and the perceived need for marriageability rather than religious obligation.
The of Muslim failure to assimilate is detrimental to America, it's laws, Security,and a threat to our Society.

 

[j-mac]

Good point. But, we are not a Christian nation anymore even if we were founded by Christian’s. Or mostly Christian’s. They knew to separate church and state.

You know who else they knew to separate? The government and corporations aka the rich.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Do you now understand how they justify raping children? Do you understand NOW that they can never assimilate? Do you even see freedom of religion as they see it?

 

[Invisibleflash]

Send them all back ASAP.

This is degeneracy that we have allowed into America and in large numbers.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

And BTW - there is no "loving Father" who would marry off his 9 year old daughter.
He would do so, because he doesn't love her. She is not worthy of love in his culture. Instead sees her as a subordinate servant to men in every way. Her place is to be put in slavery to whatever male he decides.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Where did you ever dig up that total nonsense?

JoeB's sig line.

 

[Crepitus]

So no one should eat apples because the seeds have poison?

Great argument, really winning

The very fact that you think that's what I said tells me this is not a discussion worth wasting time on.

 

[sealybobo]

He said a lot of controversial stuff. Provocative

 

[HikerGuy83]

He said a lot of controversial stuff. Provocative

He wanted people to think a little harder.

A concept(thinking...in your case...at all) you have not grasped yet.

 

[j-mac]

He said a lot of controversial stuff. Provocative

Not to rational people.

 

[sealybobo]

Not to rational people.

You’re not rational you’re conservative minded. Susceptible to bullshit. Remember bush made sense to you?

 

[j-mac]

You’re not rational you’re conservative minded. Susceptible to bullshit. Remember bush made sense to you?

Yep, I do remember. But, a mirror would be a great asset to you....Maybe you could ask for one for Christmas....

 

[sealybobo]

Yep, I do remember. But, a mirror would be a great asset to you....Maybe you could ask for one for Christmas....

I just told another usmb idiot who suggested Hillary wouldn’t have been great. Why not? Trump said bill was great. Why wouldn’t Hillary have been great too? Trump said you’re just jealous. So you should have voted for gore too but your dumb ass voted for bush. Didn’t you?

 

[j-mac]

I just told another usmb idiot who suggested Hillary wouldn’t have been great. Why not? Trump said bill was great. Why wouldn’t Hillary have been great too? Trump said you’re just jealous. So you should have voted for gore too but your dumb ass voted for bush. Didn’t you?

What’s your point? Deflection?

 

[sealybobo]

What’s your point? Deflection?

You think bush, trump and Charlie are rational.

And then sometimes you guys flip flip. Like recently because Scott bessent is gay, usmb republicans are suddenly ok with gay marriage and adoption.

Charlie Kirk: “Monogamous heterosexual marriage should be a prerequisite to adoption”​

 

[j-mac]

You think bush, trump and Charlie are rational.

And then sometimes you guys flip flip. Like recently because Scott bessent is gay, usmb republicans are suddenly ok with gay marriage and adoption.

Charlie Kirk: “Monogamous heterosexual marriage should be a prerequisite to adoption”​

I see, so whatever anyone says within the so called right, we all must agree in monolithic fealty. Is that right?

 

[Dagoth-Ur]

The very fact that you think that's what I said tells me this is not a discussion worth wasting time on.

Your time has no value.

 

[Dagoth-Ur]

You think bush, trump and Charlie are rational.

And then sometimes you guys flip flip. Like recently because Scott bessent is gay, usmb republicans are suddenly ok with gay marriage and adoption.

Charlie Kirk: “Monogamous heterosexual marriage should be a prerequisite to adoption”​

He isn’t wrong.