“If a loving father wants to marry off his nine-year-old daughter to a righteous man and all parties consent, what is the issue with that?”

[toobfreak]

Send them all back ASAP. This is degeneracy that we have allowed into America and in large numbers.

What do you mean? According to every democrat, a 9-year-old is perfectly old enough to decide her entire future, gender and body, so what the heck's wrong with her/she/them/it getting married and having some hairy, sweaty pig grunting on top of her while she is still learning how to write and where Europe is on a map?

 

[toobfreak]

Neurotic people don't think they are neurotic.

Where did you ever dig up that total nonsense?

 

[toobfreak]

They bring their 8th century religion/government/customs with them. Muslims don't assimilate.

Well, no, Mike, I mean, just because you take a dog in to live in your house doesn't mean that the dog starts brushing his teeth and wearing pajamas to bed, if you know what I mean. The dog is still a dog.

 

[badbob85037]

Send them all back ASAP.

This is degeneracy that we have allowed into America and in large numbers.

It's a gutter religion founded by a child raping, murderer, believed by murderers, pedophiles, democrats, devils, demons, and closet homos with their brown eyed boys who they say are only there to serve the drinks.

 

[SaxonJackson]

Send them all back ASAP.

This is degeneracy that we have allowed into America and in large numbers.

Romans 3:10, “As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:”

Isaiah 64:6, "But we are all as an unclean thing, and all our righteousnesses are as filthy rags; and we all do fade as a leaf; and our iniquities, like the wind, have taken us away."

It's IMPOSSIBLE to "give your daughter" to a "righteous" man.

Pedophiles should be tried, convicted and shot. Even the ones on Epstein's list.

But the Muzzies aren't the only sick Pedos out there. There's also the American club of sick pigs called NAMBLA.

The Babylonian Talmud also allows for child "marriage":

"The Talmud, however, teaches that a father can betroth his daughter (on her journey from ketannah to na’arah to bogeret) of only three years and one day old (Sanhedrin 55b, Kiddushin 41)."

https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/child-marriage/

 

[Dagoth-Ur]

Richard II married Isabelle who was only six-years-old. Christianity, you know. Paedophile priests are rampant in the American Catholic Church. They even bypass the sanctity of Holy matrimony. Where should we send them back to?

Now do how many kids are touched by public school teachers, I’ll wait.

 

[initforme]

Why do marriages need to be 'consumated"? What a dumb idea.

 

[sealybobo]

This time, we agree.

This is why Separation of church and state is important. This in Iraq:

The law gives religious authorities the power to decide on family matters, including marriage, divorce, and child custody, and abolishes a longstanding ban on child marriage under the age of 18, which had been in place since the 1950s.

In America we have laws Muslims and Mormons must follow, although we know paligamy is rampant in Utah.

Muslims need to take over one state like Utah did. Then do what you want. States rights

 

[SaxonJackson]

This is why Separation of church and state is important. This in Iraq:

The law gives religious authorities the power to decide on family matters, including marriage, divorce, and child custody, and abolishes a longstanding ban on child marriage under the age of 18, which had been in place since the 1950s.

In America we have laws Muslims and Mormons must follow, although we know paligamy is rampant in Utah.

Muslims need to take over one state like Utah did. Then do what you want. States rights

The American Founders built the nation and wrote the Constitution based on Christian values. Most of them were Christians. People purposely misuse Jefferson's quote about "church and state" and misconstrue his intent. Jefferson meant that the State should not adhere to a particular denomination like King George had. Jefferson was concerned that one denomination may persecute other denominations.

Here's a quote from the Library of Congress:

Religion and the Congress of the Confederation - Religion and the Founding of the American Republic | Exhibitions (Library of Congress)

The Continental-Confederation Congress, a legislative body that governed the United States from 1774 to 1789, contained a number of deeply religious men. Although the Articles of Confederation did not officially authorize Congress to concern itself with religion, the citizenry did not object to...

www.loc.gov

"The Continental-Confederation Congress, a legislative body that governed the United States from 1774 to 1789, contained an extraordinary number of deeply religious men. The amount of energy that Congress invested in encouraging the practice of religion in the new nation exceeded that expended by any subsequent American national government. Although the Articles of Confederation did not officially authorize Congress to concern itself with religion, the citizenry did not object to such activities. This lack of objection suggests that both the legislators and the public considered it appropriate for the national government to promote a nondenominational, nonpolemical Christianity.

Congress appointed chaplains for itself and the armed forces, sponsored the publication of a Bible, imposed Christian morality on the armed forces, and granted public lands to promote Christianity among the Indians. National days of thanksgiving and of "humiliation, fasting, and prayer" were proclaimed by Congress at least twice a year throughout the war. Congress was guided by "covenant theology," a Reformation doctrine especially dear to New England Puritans, which held that God bound himself in an agreement with a nation and its people. This agreement stipulated that they "should be prosperous or afflicted, according as their general Obedience or Disobedience thereto appears." Wars and revolutions were, accordingly, considered afflictions, as divine punishments for sin, from which a nation could rescue itself by repentance and reformation.

The first national government of the United States, was convinced that the "public prosperity" of a society depended on the vitality of its religion. Nothing less than a 'spirit of universal reformation among all ranks and degrees of our citizens," Congress declared to the American people, would "make us a holy, that so we may be a happy people.'"

 

[Hafar1014]

Where did you ever dig up that total nonsense?

We dont use that term anymore but one hallmark of mental illness is denial. Often people with depression and anxiety may not know it

 

[Hafar1014]

The American Founders built the nation and wrote the Constitution based on Christian values. Most of them were Christians. People purposely misuse Jefferson's quote about "church and state" and misconstrue his intent. Jefferson meant that the State should not adhere to a particular denomination like King George had. Jefferson was concerned that one denomination may persecute other denominations.

Here's a quote from the Library of Congress:

Religion and the Congress of the Confederation - Religion and the Founding of the American Republic | Exhibitions (Library of Congress)

The Continental-Confederation Congress, a legislative body that governed the United States from 1774 to 1789, contained a number of deeply religious men. Although the Articles of Confederation did not officially authorize Congress to concern itself with religion, the citizenry did not object to...

www.loc.gov

"The Continental-Confederation Congress, a legislative body that governed the United States from 1774 to 1789, contained an extraordinary number of deeply religious men. The amount of energy that Congress invested in encouraging the practice of religion in the new nation exceeded that expended by any subsequent American national government. Although the Articles of Confederation did not officially authorize Congress to concern itself with religion, the citizenry did not object to such activities. This lack of objection suggests that both the legislators and the public considered it appropriate for the national government to promote a nondenominational, nonpolemical Christianity.

Congress appointed chaplains for itself and the armed forces, sponsored the publication of a Bible, imposed Christian morality on the armed forces, and granted public lands to promote Christianity among the Indians. National days of thanksgiving and of "humiliation, fasting, and prayer" were proclaimed by Congress at least twice a year throughout the war. Congress was guided by "covenant theology," a Reformation doctrine especially dear to New England Puritans, which held that God bound himself in an agreement with a nation and its people. This agreement stipulated that they "should be prosperous or afflicted, according as their general Obedience or Disobedience thereto appears." Wars and revolutions were, accordingly, considered afflictions, as divine punishments for sin, from which a nation could rescue itself by repentance and reformation.

The first national government of the United States, was convinced that the "public prosperity" of a society depended on the vitality of its religion. Nothing less than a 'spirit of universal reformation among all ranks and degrees of our citizens," Congress declared to the American people, would "make us a holy, that so we may be a happy people.'"

They were Jewish values

 

[sealybobo]

The American Founders built the nation and wrote the Constitution based on Christian values. Most of them were Christians. People purposely misuse Jefferson's quote about "church and state" and misconstrue his intent. Jefferson meant that the State should not adhere to a particular denomination like King George had. Jefferson was concerned that one denomination may persecute other denominations.

Here's a quote from the Library of Congress:

Religion and the Congress of the Confederation - Religion and the Founding of the American Republic | Exhibitions (Library of Congress)

The Continental-Confederation Congress, a legislative body that governed the United States from 1774 to 1789, contained a number of deeply religious men. Although the Articles of Confederation did not officially authorize Congress to concern itself with religion, the citizenry did not object to...

www.loc.gov

"The Continental-Confederation Congress, a legislative body that governed the United States from 1774 to 1789, contained an extraordinary number of deeply religious men. The amount of energy that Congress invested in encouraging the practice of religion in the new nation exceeded that expended by any subsequent American national government. Although the Articles of Confederation did not officially authorize Congress to concern itself with religion, the citizenry did not object to such activities. This lack of objection suggests that both the legislators and the public considered it appropriate for the national government to promote a nondenominational, nonpolemical Christianity.

Congress appointed chaplains for itself and the armed forces, sponsored the publication of a Bible, imposed Christian morality on the armed forces, and granted public lands to promote Christianity among the Indians. National days of thanksgiving and of "humiliation, fasting, and prayer" were proclaimed by Congress at least twice a year throughout the war. Congress was guided by "covenant theology," a Reformation doctrine especially dear to New England Puritans, which held that God bound himself in an agreement with a nation and its people. This agreement stipulated that they "should be prosperous or afflicted, according as their general Obedience or Disobedience thereto appears." Wars and revolutions were, accordingly, considered afflictions, as divine punishments for sin, from which a nation could rescue itself by repentance and reformation.

The first national government of the United States, was convinced that the "public prosperity" of a society depended on the vitality of its religion. Nothing less than a 'spirit of universal reformation among all ranks and degrees of our citizens," Congress declared to the American people, would "make us a holy, that so we may be a happy people.'"

Good point. But, we are not a Christian nation anymore even if we were founded by Christian’s. Or mostly Christian’s. They knew to separate church and state.

You know who else they knew to separate? The government and corporations aka the rich.

 

[1srelluc]

Well, it would help to keep the Muslim inbreeding down if applied correctly. Perhaps IQs would rise as a result.

I suspect the real rub here is the disparity in ages. I'm not uncomfortable with arranged marriages but the age difference is just to great to overcome.

There was a time in America (before America became more mobile) when the family bible was a very valuable tool for families to determine if a prospective couple were too closely related. In small and more isolated communities everyone was related. Third cousins and better were considered GTG.

LOL.....Given the whining from women these days that they can't find a suitable mate perhaps an arranged marriage is just the ticket.

 

[Crepitus]

Send them all back ASAP.

This is degeneracy that we have allowed into America and in large numbers.

A. No, that should not be allowed.

But

B. You should be aware that certain fundamentalist Christian groups advocate for the same kinda thing so "sending them all back" is just your racism talking.

 

[Crepitus]

Probably to any place where Arab culture dominates since pederasty remains a common practice.

BTW, nor more "rampant" than in any other religion and/or occupation.

That's untrue. They are indeed rampant and protected by their occupation.

 

[Crepitus]

There was no consummation until she reached the correct age.

And your derail is pathetic.

No one has claimed there would be consummation until an appropriate age is reached in this case either.

Cool deflection though.

 

[SweetSue92]

Send them all back ASAP.

This is degeneracy that we have allowed into America and in large numbers.

Oh. Is this just the "child marriage" faction of Islam, or the one where they sew women's labia closed?

 

[Crepitus]

Doubtless arranged marriages of young girls are OK for you and Muslims, but not for me. So I guess it's a relative issue.

Don't forget the "crystal blade" Mormons and certain protestant sects like the snake handlers..

 

[Crepitus]

What do you mean? According to every democrat, a 9-year-old is perfectly old enough to decide her entire future, gender and body, so what the heck's wrong with her/she/them/it getting married and having some hairy, sweaty pig grunting on top of her while she is still learning how to write and where Europe is on a map?

Don't be stupider than you have to be, kid.

 

[SweetSue92]

No one has claimed there would be consummation until an appropriate age is reached in this case either.

Cool deflection though.

Okay cool. Another liberal so hogtied to Islam you think marrying off 9 yo is fine.

I think you folks are blinded by the brown skin and "exotic" outfits. Seriously, liberals will defend anything with brown skin and outfits