Idiot Trump Blames the Constitution for His Failed First 100 Days

[radical right]

The constitution was deeply flawed. It took 26 amendments to make it better.

Or perhaps the constitution wasn't flawed in that it allows for the constitution to be amended, so it can move with the times. It's not the constitution that has the flaw, but the people.

The constitution was deeply flawed. It institutionalized slavery and didn't protect any rights of the people. BUT, like an AI program, it had the ability to learn from its mistakes, and could correct it's flaws.

 

[frigidweirdo]

The constitution was deeply flawed. It took 26 amendments to make it better.

Or perhaps the constitution wasn't flawed in that it allows for the constitution to be amended, so it can move with the times. It's not the constitution that has the flaw, but the people.

The constitution was deeply flawed. It institutionalized slavery and didn't protect any rights of the people. BUT, like an AI program, it had the ability to learn from its mistakes, and could correct it's flaws.

It was a product of its times and its politics.

The problem right now is that the people don't want to fix the problems it is causing to present day society.

 

[BluesLegend]

‘In an interview with Fox News to mark the 100-day mark, he declared himself “disappointed” with congressional Republicans, despite his many “great relationships” with them.

He blamed the constitutional checks and balances built in to US governance. “It’s a very rough system,” he said. “It’s an archaic system … It’s really a bad thing for the country.”’

Trump blames constitution for chaos of his first 100 days

No, Trump and Congressional Republicans are ‘really a bad thing’ for the country.

Trump is correct, you are the idiot. Or you are just being intentionally dishonest to troll. Those idiots in congress have a huge majority, yet they can't pass a bill. Trump held up his end, he won the presidency which is what House Republicans said they needed. Well what's the ******* hold up?

Then Trump is neither the great negotiator he claimed to be nor is he ready for this job. Obama had an even bigger majority of Democrats and yet he still pushed his stimulus package through the Congress to get them to vote on it, and pass it, within weeks of being sworn in.

Leading is what leaders do. Losers tweet about why they're not winning.

So far, all he has negotiated is him backing down from every single world leader he's talked to.

"Sad, really".


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

Trump is an embarrassment to this great country which he doesn't even believe is s great.

Mexico: We're not paying for that ******* wall!

Trump: Ok, sir, we won't build it then.

You lie ^^^

 

[BluesLegend]

‘In an interview with Fox News to mark the 100-day mark, he declared himself “disappointed” with congressional Republicans, despite his many “great relationships” with them.

He blamed the constitutional checks and balances built in to US governance. “It’s a very rough system,” he said. “It’s an archaic system … It’s really a bad thing for the country.”’

Trump blames constitution for chaos of his first 100 days

No, Trump and Congressional Republicans are ‘really a bad thing’ for the country.

Trump is correct, you are the idiot. Or you are just being intentionally dishonest to troll. Those idiots in congress have a huge majority, yet they can't pass a bill. Trump held up his end, he won the presidency which is what House Republicans said they needed. Well what's the ******* hold up?

Then Trump is neither the great negotiator he claimed to be nor is he ready for this job. Obama had an even bigger majority of Democrats and yet he still pushed his stimulus package through the Congress to get them to vote on it, and pass it, within weeks of being sworn in.

Leading is what leaders do. Losers tweet about why they're not winning.

So far, all he has negotiated is him backing down from every single world leader he's talked to.

"Sad, really".


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

He is a self described Bully who turns out to.be a Weeny.

Trump is a self made billionaire who kicked the shit out of Hillary and your entire party.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The reason they couldn't sink O'Care is too many of them (and their families and friends) are getting real benefit from it, like millions of other Americans.
The call to repeal it is just a dog-whistle, and the curs are baying.

Oh yes they love paying 6,000 to 12,000 deductible.

 

[bripat9643]

‘In an interview with Fox News to mark the 100-day mark, he declared himself “disappointed” with congressional Republicans, despite his many “great relationships” with them.

He blamed the constitutional checks and balances built in to US governance. “It’s a very rough system,” he said. “It’s an archaic system … It’s really a bad thing for the country.”’

Trump blames constitution for chaos of his first 100 days

No, Trump and Congressional Republicans are ‘really a bad thing’ for the country.

Obama whined that he wasn't a dictator, like whoever runs China. The he claimed he vould change the law with his pen and his phone

Sent from my SM-G935P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[bripat9643]

He reminds me of the president of turkey in too many ways...The guys insane...

His policies will destroy this country.

Which ones are going to "destroy this country," and why?

Sent from my SM-G935P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[bripat9643]

Donald Trump goes unhinged and has a melt down ...you can't handle the Truth Orange *****...Blames the Constitution Blames the Press Blames everybody except his own Nasty self


Trump snaps and calls CBS show ‘Deface the Nation’ after host points out policy reversals in first 100 days
The president of the United States slurred a CBS News program by calling it “Deface the Nation” during an interview that was broadcast over the weekend.

Go Trump!

Stuff like that is why I love Trump.

Seldom have the fake media douche bags heard the truth delivered in such blunt terms.

Sent from my SM-G935P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[bripat9643]

Since before the first R debate, trump has tales about gutting the constitution. Watch his crowds. Damn fool traitors are actually in favor of it.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com

When did Trump say he wanted to gut the Constitution?

Sent from my SM-G935P using USMessageBoard.com mobile app

 

[Cellblock2429]

The constitution was deeply flawed. It took 26 amendments to make it better.

Or perhaps the constitution wasn't flawed in that it allows for the constitution to be amended, so it can move with the times. It's not the constitution that has the flaw, but the people.

The constitution was deeply flawed. It institutionalized slavery and didn't protect any rights of the people. BUT, like an AI program, it had the ability to learn from its mistakes, and could correct it's flaws.

/---- So why didn't Obozo and the Dems use the power of Constitutional Amendments to repair the "flawed" Constitution when they had all three branches of power?

 

[frigidweirdo]

The constitution was deeply flawed. It took 26 amendments to make it better.

Or perhaps the constitution wasn't flawed in that it allows for the constitution to be amended, so it can move with the times. It's not the constitution that has the flaw, but the people.

The constitution was deeply flawed. It institutionalized slavery and didn't protect any rights of the people. BUT, like an AI program, it had the ability to learn from its mistakes, and could correct it's flaws.

/---- So why didn't Obozo and the Dems use the power of Constitutional Amendments to repair the "flawed" Constitution when they had all three branches of power?

This is where someone tells you what is required to change the constitution.

 

[Cellblock2429]

The constitution was deeply flawed. It took 26 amendments to make it better.

Or perhaps the constitution wasn't flawed in that it allows for the constitution to be amended, so it can move with the times. It's not the constitution that has the flaw, but the people.

The constitution was deeply flawed. It institutionalized slavery and didn't protect any rights of the people. BUT, like an AI program, it had the ability to learn from its mistakes, and could correct it's flaws.

/---- So why didn't Obozo and the Dems use the power of Constitutional Amendments to repair the "flawed" Constitution when they had all three branches of power?

This is where someone tells you what is required to change the constitution.

/---- How about me telling you?
Step 1: Two-thirds of both houses of Congress when the DemocRATS controlled them pass a proposed constitutional amendment. This sends the proposed amendment to the states for ratification.
Step 2: Three-fourths of the states (38 states) ratify the proposed amendment, either by their legislatures or special ratifying conventions. Obozo didn't even have to sign it.
So why didn't they try?
How to Amend the Constitution

 

[frigidweirdo]

The constitution was deeply flawed. It took 26 amendments to make it better.

Or perhaps the constitution wasn't flawed in that it allows for the constitution to be amended, so it can move with the times. It's not the constitution that has the flaw, but the people.

The constitution was deeply flawed. It institutionalized slavery and didn't protect any rights of the people. BUT, like an AI program, it had the ability to learn from its mistakes, and could correct it's flaws.

/---- So why didn't Obozo and the Dems use the power of Constitutional Amendments to repair the "flawed" Constitution when they had all three branches of power?

This is where someone tells you what is required to change the constitution.

/---- How about me telling you?
Step 1: Two-thirds of both houses of Congress when the DemocRATS controlled them pass a proposed constitutional amendment. This sends the proposed amendment to the states for ratification.
Step 2: Three-fourths of the states (38 states) ratify the proposed amendment, either by their legislatures or special ratifying conventions. Obozo didn't even have to sign it.
So why didn't they try?
How to Amend the Constitution
View attachment 124115

Let's see.

Two thirds of the House.

Well, three out of the four congresses under Obama had a Republican majority. From 2009-2010 it was 255 to 179, now 288 is required for a 2/3rds majority.

In the Senate they had a majority three times, 59, 51, 53, none of which make up 2/3rds. As for the states, there is no way the Democrats would get 2/3rds in the House, or the Senate. As for the states, McCain got 22 of the 50 states out there, again, when you need 2/3rds of the states and you don't have that, then what's the point?

 

[Cellblock2429]

Or perhaps the constitution wasn't flawed in that it allows for the constitution to be amended, so it can move with the times. It's not the constitution that has the flaw, but the people.

The constitution was deeply flawed. It institutionalized slavery and didn't protect any rights of the people. BUT, like an AI program, it had the ability to learn from its mistakes, and could correct it's flaws.

/---- So why didn't Obozo and the Dems use the power of Constitutional Amendments to repair the "flawed" Constitution when they had all three branches of power?

This is where someone tells you what is required to change the constitution.

/---- How about me telling you?
Step 1: Two-thirds of both houses of Congress when the DemocRATS controlled them pass a proposed constitutional amendment. This sends the proposed amendment to the states for ratification.
Step 2: Three-fourths of the states (38 states) ratify the proposed amendment, either by their legislatures or special ratifying conventions. Obozo didn't even have to sign it.
So why didn't they try?
How to Amend the Constitution
View attachment 124115

Let's see.

Two thirds of the House.

Well, three out of the four congresses under Obama had a Republican majority. From 2009-2010 it was 255 to 179, now 288 is required for a 2/3rds majority.

In the Senate they had a majority three times, 59, 51, 53, none of which make up 2/3rds. As for the states, there is no way the Democrats would get 2/3rds in the House, or the Senate. As for the states, McCain got 22 of the 50 states out there, again, when you need 2/3rds of the states and you don't have that, then what's the point?

/--- His first two years --- His first two years Dems controlled everything. Why didn't they even try? It wasn't even on the radar that's why.

 

[frigidweirdo]

The constitution was deeply flawed. It institutionalized slavery and didn't protect any rights of the people. BUT, like an AI program, it had the ability to learn from its mistakes, and could correct it's flaws.

/---- So why didn't Obozo and the Dems use the power of Constitutional Amendments to repair the "flawed" Constitution when they had all three branches of power?

This is where someone tells you what is required to change the constitution.

/---- How about me telling you?
Step 1: Two-thirds of both houses of Congress when the DemocRATS controlled them pass a proposed constitutional amendment. This sends the proposed amendment to the states for ratification.
Step 2: Three-fourths of the states (38 states) ratify the proposed amendment, either by their legislatures or special ratifying conventions. Obozo didn't even have to sign it.
So why didn't they try?
How to Amend the Constitution
View attachment 124115

Let's see.

Two thirds of the House.

Well, three out of the four congresses under Obama had a Republican majority. From 2009-2010 it was 255 to 179, now 288 is required for a 2/3rds majority.

In the Senate they had a majority three times, 59, 51, 53, none of which make up 2/3rds. As for the states, there is no way the Democrats would get 2/3rds in the House, or the Senate. As for the states, McCain got 22 of the 50 states out there, again, when you need 2/3rds of the states and you don't have that, then what's the point?

/--- His first two years --- His first two years Dems controlled everything. Why didn't they even try? It wasn't even on the radar that's why.

Which part of TWO THIRDS don't you get?

They didn't have two thirds in the House, the Senate, or the states. Would you flog a dead horse for no reason but show you're going to fail?

Also, it's not even the point. The point is the Constitution is broken, and the two main parties FAVOR the brokenness of it. It's the PEOPLE who should be wanting it to be fixed to get rid of the two main partisan politics parties.

 

[Dragonlady]

‘In an interview with Fox News to mark the 100-day mark, he declared himself “disappointed” with congressional Republicans, despite his many “great relationships” with them.

He blamed the constitutional checks and balances built in to US governance. “It’s a very rough system,” he said. “It’s an archaic system … It’s really a bad thing for the country.”’

Trump blames constitution for chaos of his first 100 days

No, Trump and Congressional Republicans are ‘really a bad thing’ for the country.

Trump is correct, you are the idiot. Or you are just being intentionally dishonest to troll. Those idiots in congress have a huge majority, yet they can't pass a bill. Trump held up his end, he won the presidency which is what House Republicans said they needed. Well what's the ******* hold up?

Perhaps if the Bill wasn't such a piece of shit, it would have passed, but throwing 25 million Americans off their healthcare while giving a $32,000 tax break to millionaires, will cost Republicans the midterms and the next Presidency.

Congress critters will NOT vote themselves out of a job. Even Republicans aren't that dumb.

R's are too spineless to get rid of ocare.

The ACA is a very large and complex piece of legislation which made systemic changes to the healthcare system in the US, especially concerning Medicaid. I haven't delved deeply into the mechanics of it and can't comment on what's different.

I saw an interview with a Republican Senator before the 2012 election, and I'm sorry, but I don't remember who it was, but he said that these systemic changes which were being phased in, had to be stopped and the legislation repealed before 2013, otherwise, they would be impossible to undo or repeal.

This is why the 2012 Presidential election was so important to Republicans. They needed the White House to stop the ACA from being implemented. That didn't happen. Undoing the ACA won't be that easy.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

‘In an interview with Fox News to mark the 100-day mark, he declared himself “disappointed” with congressional Republicans, despite his many “great relationships” with them.

He blamed the constitutional checks and balances built in to US governance. “It’s a very rough system,” he said. “It’s an archaic system … It’s really a bad thing for the country.”’

Trump blames constitution for chaos of his first 100 days

No, Trump and Congressional Republicans are ‘really a bad thing’ for the country.

Trump is correct, you are the idiot. Or you are just being intentionally dishonest to troll. Those idiots in congress have a huge majority, yet they can't pass a bill. Trump held up his end, he won the presidency which is what House Republicans said they needed. Well what's the ******* hold up?

Perhaps if the Bill wasn't such a piece of shit, it would have passed, but throwing 25 million Americans off their healthcare while giving a $32,000 tax break to millionaires, will cost Republicans the midterms and the next Presidency.

Congress critters will NOT vote themselves out of a job. Even Republicans aren't that dumb.

R's are too spineless to get rid of ocare.

The ACA is a very large and complex piece of legislation which made systemic changes to the healthcare system in the US, especially concerning Medicaid. I haven't delved deeply into the mechanics of it and can't comment on what's different.

I saw an interview with a Republican Senator before the 2012 election, and I'm sorry, but I don't remember who it was, but he said that these systemic changes which were being phased in, had to be stopped and the legislation repealed before 2013, otherwise, they would be impossible to undo or repeal.

This is why the 2012 Presidential election was so important to Republicans. They needed the White House to stop the ACA from being implemented. That didn't happen. Undoing the ACA won't be that easy.

It would be if they had a coherent plan but they don't.

 

[IsaacNewton]

"He blamed the constitutional checks and balances built in to US governance. “It’s a very rough system,” he said. “It’s an archaic system … It’s really a bad thing for the country.” "

And there it is, Trump actually says out loud "the Constitutional checks and balances are bad for the country". And where are the Republicans in Congress? Nowhere. If president Obama had even uttered such a thing Republicans would have gone to impeachment proceedings immediately AND RIGHTLY SO. Any president that would claim the Constitution archaic and 'bad for the country' needs to be removed from office immediately.

Trump is a direct threat to this democracy, it was obvious to many before the election and now he has proven it. Yet no action by the Republicans. Reince Priebus has stated the White House has had discussions on 'changing the 1st amendment'.

"Dictators, unlike Democrats, depend on a small coterie to sustain their power. These backers, generally drawn from the military, the senior civil service, and family or clan members, have a synergistic relationship with their dictator. The dictator delivers opportunities for them to become rich, and they protect him from being overthrown."
- Bruce Mequita -

"Italy in the 1920s, Germany in the '30s, East Germany in the '50s, Czechoslovakia in the '60s, the Latin American dictatorships in the '70s, China in the '80s and '90s - all dictatorships and would-be dictators target newspapers and journalists."
- Naomi Wolf -

“The loyal dogs of a dictator are much more dangerous than the dictator himself because a dictator can bite you only through his supporters. Without his dogs, he is nothing! More’s the pity, the world history is full of such loyal biters!” - Memet Ildan -

 

[meaner gene]

Trump is a self made billionaire who kicked the shit out of Hillary and your entire party.

It took Trump two loans, and an inheritance of $200 million,

 

[meaner gene]

And there it is, Trump actually says out loud "the Constitutional checks and balances are bad for the country". And where are the Republicans in Congress? Nowhere. If president Obama had even uttered such a thing Republicans would have gone to impeachment proceedings immediately AND RIGHTLY SO. Any president that would claim the Constitution archaic and 'bad for the country' needs to be removed from office immediately.-

You have Trump in violation of his oath of office, to support protect and defend the constitution of the united states,.

Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:—"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."