Idiot Howard Dean: 'Hate Speech Is Not Protected By The First Amendment' (I Beg To Differ!)

[JakeStarkey]

depotoo does not understand constitutional concepts. The picture is free speech, clearly. Shouting the N word in Watts is not free speech. Shouting fire in a theatre is not free speech. Coulter has no free speech right at UCB to be invited to speak.

The hard right antifas are so easily confounded here. You are one, others include Uncensored and MarionMorrison and bear and the regressive Mac1958.

Calm down and think about it, guys.

Oh, please. You can't be serious. So words are no longer protected but violent art work toward a President is, which could produce ideas or invoke violence from either side whether through revenge or producing an idiot to attempt to behead isn't. And this was done by a public university professor. What ever happened to "sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me"?

Onehudredfuckingfourtyseventhousand posts here, and still not a single original or coherent thought. My mind is blown by such incredible dedication.

Having your nonsense thrown back at you makes your head hurt, I know. You neo-fascist antifas are having trouble with constitutional principles, I know. You know you are in overhead your head.

 

[12icer]

#101 Point in case.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The hard right here believe that 1st amendment rights do not apply to those whom they oppose. Why? Because they hate American values. None of them have been able to support hate speech as a protected right.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

depotoo does not understand constitutional concepts. The picture is free speech, clearly. Shouting the N word in Watts is not free speech. Shouting fire in a theatre is not free speech. Coulter has no free speech right at UCB to be invited to speak.

The hard right antifas are so easily confounded here. You are one, others include Uncensored and MarionMorrison and bear and the regressive Mac1958.

Calm down and think about it, guys.

Oh, please. You can't be serious. So words are no longer protected but violent art work toward a President is, which could produce ideas or invoke violence from either side whether through revenge or producing an idiot to attempt to behead isn't. And this was done by a public university professor. What ever happened to "sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me"?

Onehudredfuckingfourtyseventhousand posts here, and still not a single original or coherent thought. My mind is blown by such incredible dedication.

Having your nonsense thrown back at you makes your head hurt, I know. You neo-fascist antifas are having trouble with constitutional principles, I know. You know you are in overhead your head.

Rioting and mayhem used as a tactic to prevent the expression of ideas is now a principle protected by the constitution, is it?

 

[JakeStarkey]

depotoo does not understand constitutional concepts. The picture is free speech, clearly. Shouting the N word in Watts is not free speech. Shouting fire in a theatre is not free speech. Coulter has no free speech right at UCB to be invited to speak.

The hard right antifas are so easily confounded here. You are one, others include Uncensored and MarionMorrison and bear and the regressive Mac1958.

Calm down and think about it, guys.

Oh, please. You can't be serious. So words are no longer protected but violent art work toward a President is, which could produce ideas or invoke violence from either side whether through revenge or producing an idiot to attempt to behead isn't. And this was done by a public university professor. What ever happened to "sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me"?

Onehudredfuckingfourtyseventhousand posts here, and still not a single original or coherent thought. My mind is blown by such incredible dedication.

Having your nonsense thrown back at you makes your head hurt, I know. You neo-fascist antifas are having trouble with constitutional principles, I know. You know you are in overhead your head.

Rioting and mayhem used as a tactic to prevent the expression of ideas is now a principle protected by the constitution, is it?

Only if it is used to protect the alt right and neo-fascists, yes. That's how you think.

 

[12icer]

Point in case # 105. The right does not prevent freedom of expression even lies, If it did there would be NO lying dimshit scum in any office.

 

[Mac1958]

Did Dean say hate speech was protected or wasn't protected by the 1st Amendment? It's hard to believe that democrats would claim that hate speech wasn't protected since they have been engaging in nothing but hate speech since Trump was elected. Hypocrites on the left often cite the 1st Amendment when they feel like smashing windows or setting fire to cars or hanging the President in effigy but they turn their heads when the symbol of Christianity is smeared in animal feces or dunked in a vat of urine. Hate speech is protected by the 1st Amendment but just like every other Amendment in the Bill of Rights there are legal and social limits.

They're just hiding behind this "hate speech" term because it's all they have.

It's the only weapon they can use to control what others say.

They're dishonest and they're cowardly.
.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Did Dean say hate speech was protected or wasn't protected by the 1st Amendment? It's hard to believe that democrats would claim that hate speech wasn't protected since they have been engaging in nothing but hate speech since Trump was elected. Hypocrites on the left often cite the 1st Amendment when they feel like smashing windows or setting fire to cars or hanging the President in effigy but they turn their heads when the symbol of Christianity is smeared in animal feces or dunked in a vat of urine. Hate speech is protected by the 1st Amendment but just like every other Amendment in the Bill of Rights there are legal and social limits.

They're just hiding behind this "hate speech" term because it's all they have. It's the only weapon they can use to control what others say. They're dishonest and they're cowardly.
.

Calm down and try to make some sense. Attacks of hate speech are used by both sides. Not all speech is free speech as you are well aware. So explain what you are trying to say.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

The hard right here believe that 1st amendment rights do not apply to those whom they oppose. Why? Because they hate American values. None of them have been able to support hate speech as a protected right.

In your mind, define American values! Be specific.

 

[gipper]

Did Dean say hate speech was protected or wasn't protected by the 1st Amendment? It's hard to believe that democrats would claim that hate speech wasn't protected since they have been engaging in nothing but hate speech since Trump was elected. Hypocrites on the left often cite the 1st Amendment when they feel like smashing windows or setting fire to cars or hanging the President in effigy but they turn their heads when the symbol of Christianity is smeared in animal feces or dunked in a vat of urine. Hate speech is protected by the 1st Amendment but just like every other Amendment in the Bill of Rights there are legal and social limits.

They're just hiding behind this "hate speech" term because it's all they have. It's the only weapon they can use to control what others say. They're dishonest and they're cowardly.
.

Calm down and try to make some sense. Attacks of hate speech are used by both sides. Not all speech is free speech as you are well aware. So explain what you are trying to say.

Hey Jake great to see you here today. Do you think anything someone on the right says, is hate speech?

Hey...who have you snitched on today?

 

[gipper]

The hard right here believe that 1st amendment rights do not apply to those whom they oppose. Why? Because they hate American values. None of them have been able to support hate speech as a protected right.

In your mind, define American values! Be specific.

I will answer for Jake, since he such a good buddy of mine.

American values, according to Jake (the snitch) is welfare, warfare, unlimited government, collective first individuals last...and elites control everything....and all right wing viewpoints are anti-American.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

The hard right here believe that 1st amendment rights do not apply to those whom they oppose. Why? Because they hate American values. None of them have been able to support hate speech as a protected right.

In your mind, define American values! Be specific.

I will answer for Jake, since he such a good buddy of mine.

American values, according to Jake (the snitch) is welfare, warfare, unlimited government, collective first individuals last...and elites control everything....and all right wing viewpoints are anti-American.

You sum it up nicely Gipper! Thanks.

 

[JakeStarkey]

And gipper continues violating the zone rules because he cannot answer the OP honestly. gipper loves to snitch, particularly when he is caught out and stomped on.

The truth and fact of the matter is that not all speech is protected by the 1st Amendment. Examples and links of such examples are given above.

gipper runs with notorious racialists, nativists, xenophobes, etc., who apparently believe any speech with which they disagrees is "bad" speech and should be penalized. It's just how he and others think.

 

[SeaGal]

Nope, SeaGal, you see nothing. Go yell the N word at your local McDonalds. Record it on your voice app. Make sure you ask the police back for it to refresh you memory before posting.

Oh I see all right. .

Name calling 'logically invites retaliation and physical retribution'? That's an easy yes or no.

You must have missed this. But that's okay - it's ohhhh-kay.

...come to think of it...I'm wonderin', since you brought it up and all, does everyone who yells the n word at a park in Watts or McDonalds get in trouble with the police?...or just some people? Does that word always 'logically invite retaliation and physical retribution', or just sometimes? What if I sing it?

 

[Darkwind]

The whole "hate speech" meme is just a tactic to stifle debate and overthrow the First Amendment. The people who support this meme are fascists. They don't want to argue their points. They want to outlaw any debate on them. They shouldn't be treated as respectable people. They are thugs.

Like Trump supporters?

Two teens in Princess Anne, Maryland are being charged with a hate crime for torching a Trump election sign.

Two Teens Charged with Hate Crime for Vandalizing Trump Sign
​

What you got to say to that, breitboy?

I would say that you need to learn how to comprehend what is going on about you. The discussion is centered around the use of language in a way that some would find offensive. What you posted is charges agains a physical act of vandalism.

Two separate issues.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yet SeaGal thinks she has a right to use Hate Speech on people she does not like.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

And gipper continues violating the zone rules because he cannot answer the OP honestly. gipper loves to snitch, particularly when he is caught out and stomped on.

The truth and fact of the matter is that not all speech is protected by the 1st Amendment. Examples and links of such examples are given above.

gipper runs with notorious racialists, nativists, xenophobes, etc., who apparently believe any speech with which they disagrees is "bad" speech and should be penalized. It's just how he and others think.

One more time!

In your mind, how do you define American values? Be specific.

 

[SeaGal]

Yet SeaGal thinks she has a right to use Hate Speech on people she does not like.

Wassa matter Jake - questions too difficult for ya?

 

[JakeStarkey]

And gipper continues violating the zone rules because he cannot answer the OP honestly. gipper loves to snitch, particularly when he is caught out and stomped on.

The truth and fact of the matter is that not all speech is protected by the 1st Amendment. Examples and links of such examples are given above.

gipper runs with notorious racialists, nativists, xenophobes, etc., who apparently believe any speech with which they disagrees is "bad" speech and should be penalized. It's just how he and others think.

One more time!

In your mind, how do you define American values? Be specific.

By the Constitution and the amendments. How do you define them? Be specific.

 

[JakeStarkey]

SeaGal, please answer the question: is Hate Speech an American value?