leftwinger
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #301
The ICE thug is indicted and has a warrant out for their arrest.
I consider that a small victory
You missed the part move it to Federal and then dismiss it out of MineesotaStan? We can hope.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The ICE thug is indicted and has a warrant out for their arrest.
I consider that a small victory
Of course they had a case. They found the classified documents at Mar a Lago.They never had a case it was lawfare and it failed. The FBI had doubts and the case was dismissed, Thats called consistant. See how that works
First they have to prove that it belongs in federal court. That's not automatic.You missed the part move it to Federal and then dismiss it out of MineesotaStan? We can hope.
It was dismissed but Senator Biden had classified documents in his garage. The FBI did go against Trump as well as the DOJ and CIAOf course they had a case. They found the classified documents at Mar a Lago.
The FBI was scared of going up against Trump, which is a sad state of affairs where the premier law enforcement agency is intimidated by a thug like Trump. Ultimately the FBI concerns were proven to be baseless. The search warrant was approved and they found exactly what they were looking for.
The dismissal of the case had nothing to do with the merits.
Sadly, the FBI agents were right to be afraid of going after Trump as his administration is now punishing those who performed their duties in investigating and prosecuting federal crimes.It was dismissed but Senator Biden had classified documents in his garage. The FBI did go against Trump as well as the DOJ and CIA
Not at that exact momentWas he arresting an illegal?
Not because I say anything, it’s because you proved it. You have a double standard, you believe the juries got the Rittenhouse, Simpson, and Zimmerman case wrong, you just don’t have the balls to say it, which supports me when I believe that courts can get it wrong and it is all okay.You're falling back on the "because I say so".
It's relevant. Why? Because you say so.
I have a double standard. Why? Because you say so.
I pointed out your double standard and it makes you mad, so you're deflecting and now running away. Peace out, douche bag.
I don't give a shit about Rittenouse or Zimmerman. I did say juries can get it wrong, so if your trying to prove that I don't always accept the outcomes of trials, then you needn't get all huffy about specific instances. I already said so.Not because I say anything, it’s because you proved it. You have a double standard, you believe the juries got the Rittenhouse, Simpson, and Zimmerman case wrong, you just don’t have the balls to say it, which supports me when I believe that courts can get it wrong and it is all okay.
I also don’t believe in taking the law into my own hands and you do, so if anyone has a double standard, it’s you.
Got anything else or are you just going to keep trolling me?
But states can’t impose sentencing unless federal agreesFederal agents can’t do whatever they want.
CorrectSounds like the blocker should be on trial? Obstruction of Justice, impededing an official who was on-duty ?
To force an official ICE car onto the shoulder then block it more and taunt the officer?
A federal agent cannot be apprehended based on a state decisionThe ICE thug is indicted and has a warrant out for their arrest.
I consider that a small victory
The crime of one upmanship that libs feel angry overRailroaded?
There is video of him committing the crime.
Get a grip.
Of course, were this not an ICE agent committing this crime, every puffy chested white wing dipshit on this board would be calling for him to go to jail and would be bragging about how they would have shot at him out of self defense.
All frauds, to a man. Bad actors, performing for each other.
Then … noNot at that exact moment
Of course they canA federal agent cannot be apprehended based on a state decision