P F Tinmore, et al,
The enforcement of the Declaration of Principles, the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, the Affirmation of Human Rights, the Fourth Geneva Convention 1949,, the Rome Statues of the ICC, (and other landmark concepts, protocols and conventions) depends on a number of both standards and practical conditions, the least of which is a Rabbi in the Security Council.
(COMMENT)International law is rarely and selectively enforced. Generally, if someone has a friend who is a permanent member on the Security Council he can literally get away with murder.
The purpose of the BDS movement is to force compliance/enforcement of international law.
While the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) is an outspoken device employed against the State of Israel, it is actually a minor consequence in the overall instruments used for settlement.
The lack of major enforcement measures and sanctions against the Jewish State is due primarily because neither side clearly in the absolute right, and Israel [unlike the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP)] doesn't pose --- or even threaten to pose, a deadly threat against the any NATO/EU Nation. In fact, the last thing any of the G-8, NATO/EU, or the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) nations want is to become entangled in a political-military or political-economic conflict in which they have no reasonable expectation of a satisfactory outcome. The HoAP [unlike the Jewish State (Israel)] have not reinvested in there economic infrastructure to and degree that they can actually offer the G-8, NATO/EU, or the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC).
Most Respectfully,
R
or even threaten to pose, a deadly threat against the any NATO/EU Nation.
Palestine does not threaten anybody.
They threaten world peace and have been the cause of most ISLAMONAZI TERRORITS ATTACKS in the west