Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They fought for their 'identity' for "65" years, while we fought for ours for 2000.
They have 22 states to find refugee in, we have none.
Who do you think has more to lose? who will fight for their survival more?
States and identity are not solely tied to religion.
Otherwise Bangledesh would never have split off from Pakistan.
They have no more states than you have - after all, there are Jews all over the world if you look at it that way.
Both deserve recognition of their identity, a right to self determination, and a right to exist as a people. It shouldn't that hard to acknowledge - the legitimacy of fundamental rights are not determined by how long they've been fought for but by what is right and just and human - what we all want for ourselves.
They fought for their 'identity' for "65" years, while we fought for ours for 2000.
They have 22 states to find refugee in, we have none.
Who do you think has more to lose? who will fight for their survival more?
States and identity are not solely tied to religion.
Otherwise Bangledesh would never have split off from Pakistan.
They have no more states than you have - after all, there are Jews all over the world if you look at it that way.
Both deserve recognition of their identity, a right to self determination, and a right to exist as a people. It shouldn't that hard to acknowledge - the legitimacy of fundamental rights are not determined by how long they've been fought for but by what is right and just and human - what we all want for ourselves.
Then Arafat should have accepted the deal offered to him.
Either way, Abbas made it clear, he will not make peace unless the Palestinians have full sovereignty over East Jerusalem and Israel has made it clear in the past that Jerusalem will never be divided.
No peace deal is a WHOLE lot worse for the Palestinians than the Israelis
People who are willing to die to regain their dignity have nothing to lose.
Abbas says he won't make concessions on Jerusalem
RAMALLAH, West Bank (AP) Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas sent a defiant message to Israel's leadership and U.S. mediators Saturday, telling cheering supporters that the Palestinians "won't kneel" and won't drop demands for a capital in east Jerusalem.
Related Stories
Kerry sees progress on Israeli-Palestinian framework deal Reuters
Kerry heads to Middle East next week for peace talks: U.S. official Reuters
Kerry says progress in peace talks but more work needed AFP
Analysis: Israel, Palestinians face hard choices Associated Press
Kerry ends Mideast trip without framework deal AFP
Abbas' unusually fiery speech highlighted the wide gaps between him and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the outlines of a peace deal. It also raised new doubts about the chances of U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry to bridge those gaps in coming weeks and come up with a framework for an agreement.
Abbas adopted tough positions in the wide-ranging speech, saying that "there will be no peace" without a Palestinian capital in east Jerusalem and that he would not recognize Israel as a Jewish state.
He also suggested he would not continue negotiations beyond a U.S.-set target date of the end of April, and instead will resume his quest for broader international recognition of a state of Palestine by the United Nations and its various agencies.
They fought for their 'identity' for "65" years, while we fought for ours for 2000.
They have 22 states to find refugee in, we have none.
Who do you think has more to lose? who will fight for their survival more?
States and identity are not solely tied to religion.
Otherwise Bangledesh would never have split off from Pakistan.
They have no more states than you have - after all, there are Jews all over the world if you look at it that way.
Both deserve recognition of their identity, a right to self determination, and a right to exist as a people. It shouldn't that hard to acknowledge - the legitimacy of fundamental rights are not determined by how long they've been fought for but by what is right and just and human - what we all want for ourselves.
Then Arafat should have accepted the deal offered to him.
Either way, Abbas made it clear, he will not make peace unless the Palestinians have full sovereignty over East Jerusalem and Israel has made it clear in the past that Jerusalem will never be divided.
No peace deal is a WHOLE lot worse for the Palestinians than the Israelis
They fought for their 'identity' for "65" years, while we fought for ours for 2000.
They have 22 states to find refugee in, we have none.
Who do you think has more to lose? who will fight for their survival more?
States and identity are not solely tied to religion.
Otherwise Bangledesh would never have split off from Pakistan.
They have no more states than you have - after all, there are Jews all over the world if you look at it that way.
Both deserve recognition of their identity, a right to self determination, and a right to exist as a people. It shouldn't that hard to acknowledge - the legitimacy of fundamental rights are not determined by how long they've been fought for but by what is right and just and human - what we all want for ourselves.
Then Arafat should have accepted the deal offered to him.
Either way, Abbas made it clear, he will not make peace unless the Palestinians have full sovereignty over East Jerusalem and Israel has made it clear in the past that Jerusalem will never be divided.
No peace deal is a WHOLE lot worse for the Palestinians than the Israelis
States and identity are not solely tied to religion.
Otherwise Bangledesh would never have split off from Pakistan.
They have no more states than you have - after all, there are Jews all over the world if you look at it that way.
Both deserve recognition of their identity, a right to self determination, and a right to exist as a people. It shouldn't that hard to acknowledge - the legitimacy of fundamental rights are not determined by how long they've been fought for but by what is right and just and human - what we all want for ourselves.
Then Arafat should have accepted the deal offered to him.
Either way, Abbas made it clear, he will not make peace unless the Palestinians have full sovereignty over East Jerusalem and Israel has made it clear in the past that Jerusalem will never be divided.
No peace deal is a WHOLE lot worse for the Palestinians than the Israelis
The Palestinians are not looking for a peace deal. They are looking for peace.
The peace process was designed to fail. It always has and always will. The Palestinians are uniting in their own quest for peace leaving behind the phony peace process.
That's real good. Now we know the Palestinians will never have a state.
They can wait...Demographics will do the rest in a one state solution.
States and identity are not solely tied to religion.
Otherwise Bangledesh would never have split off from Pakistan.
They have no more states than you have - after all, there are Jews all over the world if you look at it that way.
Both deserve recognition of their identity, a right to self determination, and a right to exist as a people. It shouldn't that hard to acknowledge - the legitimacy of fundamental rights are not determined by how long they've been fought for but by what is right and just and human - what we all want for ourselves.
Then Arafat should have accepted the deal offered to him.
Either way, Abbas made it clear, he will not make peace unless the Palestinians have full sovereignty over East Jerusalem and Israel has made it clear in the past that Jerusalem will never be divided.
No peace deal is a WHOLE lot worse for the Palestinians than the Israelis
The Palestinians are not looking for a peace deal. They are looking for peace.
The peace process was designed to fail. It always has and always will. The Palestinians are uniting in their own quest for peace leaving behind the phony peace process.
That's real good. Now we know the Palestinians will never have a state.
They can wait...Demographics will do the rest in a one state solution.
No, they can't...
The Palestinians are running out of time...
There will be no one-state solution that includes the Muslims of Gaza and the West Bank...
The Israelis will end-up controlling those lands...
The Palestinians own propaganda maps tell us this...
It's just that the present occupants of those lands will, by then, be residing within the borders of present-day Jordan, Lebanon and Egypt...
They fought for their 'identity' for "65" years, while we fought for ours for 2000.
They have 22 states to find refugee in, we have none.
Who do you think has more to lose? who will fight for their survival more?
States and identity are not solely tied to religion.
Otherwise Bangledesh would never have split off from Pakistan.
They have no more states than you have - after all, there are Jews all over the world if you look at it that way.
Both deserve recognition of their identity, a right to self determination, and a right to exist as a people. It shouldn't that hard to acknowledge - the legitimacy of fundamental rights are not determined by how long they've been fought for but by what is right and just and human - what we all want for ourselves.
States and identity are not solely tied to religion.
Otherwise Bangledesh would never have split off from Pakistan.
They have no more states than you have - after all, there are Jews all over the world if you look at it that way.
Both deserve recognition of their identity, a right to self determination, and a right to exist as a people. It shouldn't that hard to acknowledge - the legitimacy of fundamental rights are not determined by how long they've been fought for but by what is right and just and human - what we all want for ourselves.
Then Arafat should have accepted the deal offered to him.
Either way, Abbas made it clear, he will not make peace unless the Palestinians have full sovereignty over East Jerusalem and Israel has made it clear in the past that Jerusalem will never be divided.
No peace deal is a WHOLE lot worse for the Palestinians than the Israelis
The Palestinians are not looking for a peace deal. They are looking for peace.
The peace process was designed to fail. It always has and always will. The Palestinians are uniting in their own quest for peace leaving behind the phony peace process.
Disagree.Then Arafat should have accepted the deal offered to him.
Either way, Abbas made it clear, he will not make peace unless the Palestinians have full sovereignty over East Jerusalem and Israel has made it clear in the past that Jerusalem will never be divided.
No peace deal is a WHOLE lot worse for the Palestinians than the Israelis
The Palestinians are not looking for a peace deal. They are looking for peace.
The peace process was designed to fail. It always has and always will. The Palestinians are uniting in their own quest for peace leaving behind the phony peace process.
The Palestinians are united behind the saying of "Itbah Al Yahud".
they don't want peace.
They can wait...Demographics will do the rest in a one state solution.
Thank you for exposing that the intolerant, racist arab muslims believe they can "conquer" Israel through means other than war - like the mexicans in the US - so they have no reason in their minds to negotiate in good faith, thanks for clarifying.
What then is the incentive for Israel to not expel or deport all/most of them out of the country, like Azerbaijan did in the 1990s?
That country deported all of its muslims, suffered a few years of hypocritical sanctions which ended, and is now doing quite well.
States and identity are not solely tied to religion.
Otherwise Bangledesh would never have split off from Pakistan.
They have no more states than you have - after all, there are Jews all over the world if you look at it that way.
Both deserve recognition of their identity, a right to self determination, and a right to exist as a people. It shouldn't that hard to acknowledge - the legitimacy of fundamental rights are not determined by how long they've been fought for but by what is right and just and human - what we all want for ourselves.
Then Arafat should have accepted the deal offered to him.
Either way, Abbas made it clear, he will not make peace unless the Palestinians have full sovereignty over East Jerusalem and Israel has made it clear in the past that Jerusalem will never be divided.
No peace deal is a WHOLE lot worse for the Palestinians than the Israelis
I've been to Jerusalem and I've felt what's in the air there that no youtube or picture can convey. So I, more than most people, am against dividing Jerusalem. But East Jerusalem does not equal only the Old City. Many Arab villages were annexed to Jerusalem after the Six-Day War. Some creativity can be displayed in "dividing" parts of "Jerusalem", like Silwan or Abu Dis, which can satisfy both sides.
Then Arafat should have accepted the deal offered to him.
Either way, Abbas made it clear, he will not make peace unless the Palestinians have full sovereignty over East Jerusalem and Israel has made it clear in the past that Jerusalem will never be divided.
No peace deal is a WHOLE lot worse for the Palestinians than the Israelis
I've been to Jerusalem and I've felt what's in the air there that no youtube or picture can convey. So I, more than most people, am against dividing Jerusalem. But East Jerusalem does not equal only the Old City. Many Arab villages were annexed to Jerusalem after the Six-Day War. Some creativity can be displayed in "dividing" parts of "Jerusalem", like Silwan or Abu Dis, which can satisfy both sides.
It will never happen, share it as a dual Capital or war with Islam forever.
Then Arafat should have accepted the deal offered to him.
Either way, Abbas made it clear, he will not make peace unless the Palestinians have full sovereignty over East Jerusalem and Israel has made it clear in the past that Jerusalem will never be divided.
No peace deal is a WHOLE lot worse for the Palestinians than the Israelis
I've been to Jerusalem and I've felt what's in the air there that no youtube or picture can convey. So I, more than most people, am against dividing Jerusalem. But East Jerusalem does not equal only the Old City. Many Arab villages were annexed to Jerusalem after the Six-Day War. Some creativity can be displayed in "dividing" parts of "Jerusalem", like Silwan or Abu Dis, which can satisfy both sides.
It will never happen, share it as a dual Capital or war with Islam forever.
They can wait...Demographics will do the rest in a one state solution.
Thank you for exposing that the intolerant, racist arab muslims believe they can "conquer" Israel through means other than war - like the mexicans in the US - so they have no reason in their minds to negotiate in good faith, thanks for clarifying.
What then is the incentive for Israel to not expel or deport all/most of them out of the country, like Azerbaijan did in the 1990s?
That country deported all of its muslims, suffered a few years of hypocritical sanctions which ended, and is now doing quite well.
My own feelings on the acculturation process is a fact of humanity, "No man is an island to himself"... *80% of the present Palestinian genome has roots in ancient Israel...However, I believe a two state solution will lead to many centuries of peace and prosperity for a tiny part of Arabia called Palestine...
Prosperity unlike acculturation spreads like wild-fire, and prosperity brings peace.
Then Arafat should have accepted the deal offered to him.
Either way, Abbas made it clear, he will not make peace unless the Palestinians have full sovereignty over East Jerusalem and Israel has made it clear in the past that Jerusalem will never be divided.
No peace deal is a WHOLE lot worse for the Palestinians than the Israelis
I've been to Jerusalem and I've felt what's in the air there that no youtube or picture can convey. So I, more than most people, am against dividing Jerusalem. But East Jerusalem does not equal only the Old City. Many Arab villages were annexed to Jerusalem after the Six-Day War. Some creativity can be displayed in "dividing" parts of "Jerusalem", like Silwan or Abu Dis, which can satisfy both sides.
It will never happen, share it as a dual Capital or war with Islam forever.
they are the ones who refuse to 'share' Jerusalem, and by their belief, their war with the Jews is eternal.
Thank you for exposing that the intolerant, racist arab muslims believe they can "conquer" Israel through means other than war - like the mexicans in the US - so they have no reason in their minds to negotiate in good faith, thanks for clarifying.
What then is the incentive for Israel to not expel or deport all/most of them out of the country, like Azerbaijan did in the 1990s?
That country deported all of its muslims, suffered a few years of hypocritical sanctions which ended, and is now doing quite well.
My own feelings on the acculturation process is a fact of humanity, "No man is an island to himself"... *80% of the present Palestinian genome has roots in ancient Israel...However, I believe a two state solution will lead to many centuries of peace and prosperity for a tiny part of Arabia called Palestine...
Prosperity unlike acculturation spreads like wild-fire, and prosperity brings peace.
Israel/Palestine is part of an area of Asia called the Middle East. It's not part of the peninsula called Arabia. Study some geography.
