Phoenall, Kondor3, P F Tinmore, et al,
This is just one indication of the threat the Arab League perceives in the event that the Jihadist and Fedayeen of the Palestinians pose --- should the conflict come to an end.
There are some that would suggest that given the attitude of the Palestinians, it is better to sacrifice them in continue containment, rather than let them lose to create havoc.
(COMMENT)Jordan has seen the sense in allowing Israel to patrol the Jordan valley while concentrating on its northern border with Syria. It means that Israel has an uninterrupted stretch of land that it can patrol keeping the insurgents out of Israel and Jordan
I've seen this referred to as the difference between a "Warm Peace" and a "Cold Peace." Both nations have significant concerns about the development of broader terrorist connections, and debilitating insurgency operations which will adversely impact positive economic and industrial prospects - impacting regional commerce. And advancement in regional commerce is a major support mechanism to reducing unemployment, raisin the standard of living for all concerned.
The US needs to be very careful not to widen the discord, from a Israel-Palestinian standpoint, to one that would include disagreement with Jordan. Secretary Kerry needs to back away from the process if he and his staff are not capable of including the wider region consensus which includes the ever important Jordanian view. Our policy should be prefaced with the policy: First - Do No Harm!
Most Respectfully,
R
The Palestinians are only opposed to Israel's crimes. If those are removed there would be no more violence.
Tinmore, what you just said proves just how incredibly brainwashed you are. You sound just like them LOL.
People like you will always excuse Jihad.
