I think we can accurately say much of the trump agenda is on pause. This is worse.

[Hollie]

Biden never defied Court orders but was challenged and accepted judges decisions in court....

This is the difference...

Congress has already allocated this money... Trump's job is to spend the money in accordance to to Congress's rules, he can't stop the spending and he has to spend inside the boundaries of what is allowed by Congress..

Trump's admin are just refusing to spend the money as ordered... They do not possess the power to do that...

The Judge is just telling that for the second time..

Nonsense. Biden was repeatedly smacked down by the USSC for his student debt transfers.

 

[Lesh]

Nonsense. Biden was repeatedly smacked down by the USSC for his student debt transfers.

Exactly. And each time he complied and tried to find a different legal way to do it.

Trump is just thumbing his nose and claiming courts have no power over his actions

 

[Seymour Flops]

The law is the law. Your King is not above it.

The GQP is no longer a party of morality OR a party of the Constitution.

Not an answer to my question.

The supreme law says this:

The executive power shall be vested in a president of the United States.

Therefore, no law that violates that law is valid.neither is any court willing in which the judiciary attempts to usurp executive power.

 

[Hollie]

Exactly. And each time he complied and tried to find a different legal way to do it.

Trump is just thumbing his nose and claiming courts have no power over his actions

What nonsense.

"In a 6-3 decision, the Court struck down Biden's repayment plan as unconstitutional, citing the massive $430 billion-plus impact on the federal budget without express authority from Congress."

Biden didn't comply with any USSC ruling.

 

[Mac1958]

Not an answer to my question.

The supreme law says this:

The executive power shall be vested in a president of the United States.

Therefore, no law that violates that law is valid.neither is any court willing in which the judiciary attempts to usurp executive power.

Perhaps you don't know this, but there are three branches: The Executive, the Judicial and the Legislative. No one branch has more power than another.

I am against the neofascism that is clearly taking shape, and you're fine with it. So play with someone else. I'm not trying to convince you of anything.

 

[Lesh]

What nonsense.

"In a 6-3 decision, the Court struck down Biden's repayment plan as unconstitutional, citing the massive $430 billion-plus impact on the federal budget without express authority from Congress."

Biden didn't comply with any USSC ruling.

He complied with THAT ruling dumbass

 

[Lesh]

Not an answer to my question.

The supreme law says this:

The executive power shall be vested in a president of the United States.

Therefore, no law that violates that law is valid.neither is any court willing in which the judiciary attempts to usurp executive power.

So the President can do anything he wants??

 

[Seymour Flops]

The Court is telling to follow the law...

The law is the law... There is a limit what courts can tell him do... it is called the law...

This is all in US Citizen 101....

Who interprets the law?

What law says that if an incoming president discovers that There may be massive fraud waste and abuse in our foreign aid programs and wants to pause it to investigate that he is not able to pause it but must keep pushing the money out?

 

[Hollie]

He complied with THAT ruling dumbass

He complied by subsequently announcing more debt transfers?

Supreme Court Rejects Biden’s Student Loan Forgiveness Plan (Published 2023)

The proposed debt cancellation of more than $400 billion would have been one of the most expensive executive actions in U.S. history.

www.nytimes.com

Stop being a dumbass.

 

[Seymour Flops]

So the President can do anything he wants??

He is required to run the executive branch. If he acts inappropriately in running the executive branch, the remedy is elections or impeachments.

That’s what the constitution says.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It is NOT “the same group “ at all

And I seem to remember MAGA attacks on cops… that Trump pardoned

It’s the expendable Progressive Street mobs that will again be ordered to burn down America cities and murder cops

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So the President can do anything he wants??

You think a Judge can order SecTres not to review where money is sent?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Perhaps you don't know this, but there are three branches: The Executive, the Judicial and the Legislative. No one branch has more power than another.

I am against the neofascism that is clearly taking shape, and you're fine with it. So play with someone else. I'm not trying to convince you of anything.

Yes, and the president should stay out of the purview of the other two branches just as the other two should stay out of the presents.

I would disagree with any president that suddenly announced that he had passed a law which he would now sign, or walked into a courtroom during a trial, and said that he the president was ruling on the case.

The incoming president found evidence of massive fraud, waste and abuse in spending by one of the executive agencies. He had a duty to put a stop to it. It is bizarre that some obscure federal judge thinks that he can order the President to keep pushing the money out the door.

 

[Contumacious]

Judge Rules the White House Failed to Comply With Court Order​

A federal judge on Monday said the White House has defied his order to release billions of dollars in federal grants, marking the first time a judge has expressly declared that the Trump White House was disobeying a judicial mandate.

The ruling by Judge John J. McConnell Jr. in Rhode Island federal court ordered Trump administration officials to comply with what he called “the plain text” of an edict he issued last month.

Judge McConnell’s ruling marked a step toward what could quickly evolve into a high-stakes showdown between the executive and judicial branches, a day after a social media post by Vice President JD Vance claimed that “judges aren’t allowed to control the executive’s legitimate power,” elevating the chance that the White House could provoke a constitutional crisis.

Already, more than 40 lawsuits have been filed against the Trump administration, challenging Mr. Trump’s brazen moves that have included revoking birthright citizenship and giving Elon Musk’s teams access to sensitive Treasury Department payment systems. Judges have already ruled that many of these executive actions may violate existing statutes.

White House Failed to Comply With Court Order, Judge Rules

The federal judge in Rhode Island said the Trump administration had failed to comply with his order unfreezing billions of dollars in federal grants.

www.nytimes.com

Violating existing statutes in pursuit of enacting various EO's is one thing. Violating a recently issued court order is another kind of animal.

The most litigious prez ever to occupy the WH, resulting from the personal commission of crimes, is on course to have his admin spend much of its time defending its actions against lawsuits and judicial orders. Which, frankly, is going just as some of us expected.

PROMISES MADE PROMISES KEPT

YOU CAN'T BLAME HIM BECAUSE OBAMA/BIDEN "JUDGES" ARE ACTING AS POLITICIANS IN BLACK ROBES

 

[mudwhistle]

We don’t have to. A judge issued an order and the Executive must comply.

If they refuse to we have a Constitutional crisis

A constitutional crisis is when one branch of government oversteps their authority and gets into an argument with other branches.

The president doesn't have to do what the judicial branch says. Especially when the left goes judge shopping and bribes a Soros judge into issuing orders without any basis in the law or the constitution.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Perhaps you don't know this, but there are three branches: The Executive, the Judicial and the Legislative. No one branch has more power than another.

I am against the neofascism that is clearly taking shape, and you're fine with it. So play with someone else. I'm not trying to convince you of anything.

We're against these worthless obama liberal hack judges who are ruling based on their identity politics. Yes, mr. president, keep ignoring these rogue judges. Libs are going to reach a fevered pig squealing crescendo. That just means you're rooting out the disease.

 

[berg80]

Not an answer to my question.

The supreme law says this:

The executive power shall be vested in a president of the United States.

Therefore, no law that violates that law is valid.neither is any court willing in which the judiciary attempts to usurp executive power.

Executive power is limited. When did that become a concept that's foreign to you trumples? Wait.........never mind.........I already know. It happened the moment trump decided he didn't like a judicial ruling.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Yes, and the president should stay out of the purview of the other two branches just as the other two should stay out of the presents.

I would disagree with any president that suddenly announced that he had passed a law which he would now sign, or walked into a courtroom during a trial, and said that he the president was ruling on the case.

The incoming president found evidence of massive fraud, waste and abuse in spending by one of the executive agencies. He had a duty to put a stop to it. It is bizarre that some obscure federal judge thinks that he can order the President to keep pushing the money out the door.

He found fraud on a scale not seen but the libs and macistas are tooth gnashing like this is the end.

 

[mudwhistle]

Remember, presidents are not kings.

So why did Biden get away with taking bribes from our enemies?
Why did the DOJ refuse to enforce the law?
Why are Democrats trying to stop Trump from rooting out their corruption?
Why did Biden pardon dozens of corrupt officials that were never charged with crimes?

Because you Democrats think you are above the law.
Biden reminded me more of a King, who refused to answer to the American people.

 

[Mac1958]

Executive power is limited. When did that become a concept that's foreign to you trumples? Wait.........never mind.........I already know. It happened the moment trump decided he didn't like a judicial ruling.

They're admitting that they think Trump should only follow rulings he likes.

I want to believe that they're just well-meaning, unwitting pawns, but it's beginning to look like they're literally neofascists.

I guess we may be finding out for sure, pretty soon.