I think this says something about the trump government.

At least not since the federal government became such a bloated behemoth that it is unrealistic for one person to be in charge of it all.
Yet, Dotard is claiming he has authority no other prez ever has. Cuz those prez's respected the Constitution and the balance of power the Founders intended there to be.
 
Yet, Dotard is claiming he has authority no other prez ever has. Cuz those prez's respected the Constitution and the balance of power the Founders intended there to be.

The balance is supposed to be BETWEEN the 3 branches, not within one of the branches you moron.
 
I mean, there’s a lot of examples.

He’s having his cronies dig through his enemies mortgage records. That seems a bit like weaponization.

Like Biden's admin had the State of NY make up 34 "crimes" over some checks?
 
Like Biden's admin had the State of NY make up 34 "crimes" over some checks?
Biden didn’t do that.

The NY state criminal case grew out of findings from a federal criminal case under the Trump administration into Michael Cohen.

Biden’s DoJ decided against federal charges.

The FEC dropped the investigation into Trump in 2021. If we were operating under your idea of government, Biden could have ordered the FEC to go after Trump. Right?
 
Does the Constitution forbid federal agencies from being independent?
I would argue yes, since Article II vests all executive power in the president and there is no fourth Article allowing the creation of independent agencies.

The courts may soon clarify that in a case about the consumer financial protection bureau currently on the docket of the DC court of appeals.
 
Biden didn’t do that.

The NY state criminal case grew out of findings from a federal criminal case under the Trump administration into Michael Cohen.

Biden’s DoJ decided against federal charges.

The FEC dropped the investigation into Trump in 2021. If we were operating under your idea of government, Biden could have ordered the FEC to go after Trump. Right?

Dems did it, all part of the same hive mind.

It's all the same.
 
Dems did it, all part of the same hive mind.

It's all the same.
You’re really showing your intellectual weakness. Simple minded people say things like “it’s all the same” because you can’t handle complexity.

From the beginning, was Michael Cohen’s federal prosecution during the Trump administration “weaponization” by the Dems?
 
You’re really showing your intellectual weakness. Simple minded people say things like “it’s all the same” because you can’t handle complexity.

From the beginning, was Michael Cohen’s federal prosecution during the Trump administration “weaponization” by the Dems?

LOL, you are stalking me. I used "intellectually weak" in another thread a week ago and now you are parroting me.

Pathetic.
 
LOL, you are stalking me. I used "intellectually weak" in another thread a week ago and now you are parroting me.

Pathetic.
I have no idea what you’re talking about.

But you’re a coward who won’t engage in honest discussion. It’s very easy to point out your own hypocrisy, but you can’t admit it.
 
Trump hasn't weaponized government.

Biden and his puppet masters did it.
Explain how Bragg prosecuting Trump is weaponization when Trump prosecuting James isn’t.
 
15th post
Explain how Bragg prosecuting Trump is weaponization when Trump prosecuting James isn’t.

Jame's breaking of the law was obvious and didn't require end runs of turning bookkeeping issues into a felony, nor did they require crazy jury instructions.
 
Jame's breaking of the law was obvious and didn't require end runs of turning bookkeeping issues into a felony, nor did they require crazy jury instructions.
Is it obvious? Doesn’t seem like it. They can’t get it past a grand jury. He had to fire the prosecutor who said there was no case and illegally appoint a loyalist who had never prosecuted a case before.

How did the investigation into James even begin?
 
Is it obvious? Doesn’t seem like it. They can’t get it past a grand jury. He had to fire the prosecutor who said there was no case and illegally appoint a loyalist who had never prosecuted a case before.

How did the investigation into James even begin?

Good old jury nullification.
 
Good old jury nullification.
Or maybe the jury is being presented exculpatory evidence that was withheld.

You won’t say how the investigation started because you don’t want to admit that it stated because she was being targeted specifically out of hatred from Trump. How is that not weaponization?
 
Back
Top Bottom