I think this says something about the trump government.

[martybegan]

Or maybe the jury is being presented exculpatory evidence that was withheld.

You won’t say how the investigation started because you don’t want to admit that it stated because she was being targeted specifically out of hatred from Trump. How is that not weaponization?

I'd go with nullification.

LOL, every single Republican is scrutinized by the left the second they take office. your protestations fall on deaf ears.

 

[Marener]

I'd go with nullification.

LOL, every single Republican is scrutinized by the left the second they take office. your protestations fall on deaf ears.

You don't know about Bill Pulte, then?

Trump installs him as head of FHFA and he's the guy digging up everyone's mortgage records. Well, not everyone. He's digging up the records of anyone that Trump has a problem with.

That's not weaponization?

It attracted the attention of the people in government whose job it is to look out for weaponization. But guess what? They were fired for looking into it.

Fannie Mae ethics office purged after probe into Trump's 'attack dog': report

Bill Pulte, the director of President Donald Trump's Federal Housing Finance Agency, was under investigation by ethics watchdogs shortly before the ethics office overseeing the agency was cleaned out by layoffs, reported The Wall Street Journal on Tuesday.According to the report, the ethics...

www.rawstory.com

That's not weaponization?

 

[martybegan]

You don't know about Bill Pulte, then?

Trump installs him as head of FHFA and he's the guy digging up everyone's mortgage records. Well, not everyone. He's digging up the records of anyone that Trump has a problem with.

That's not weaponization?

It attracted the attention of the people in government whose job it is to look out for weaponization. But guess what? They were fired for looking into it.

Fannie Mae ethics office purged after probe into Trump's 'attack dog': report

Bill Pulte, the director of President Donald Trump's Federal Housing Finance Agency, was under investigation by ethics watchdogs shortly before the ethics office overseeing the agency was cleaned out by layoffs, reported The Wall Street Journal on Tuesday.According to the report, the ethics...

www.rawstory.com

That's not weaponization?

Rawstory.....

Nope.

 

[Marener]

Rawstory.....

Nope.

Pretty pathetic.

See how your governing philosophy creates the opportunity for corruption and weaponization?

Appointing loyalists to run agencies which are supposed to be nonpartisan, and using their positions to attack your political enemies.

Firing anyone who blows the whistle on the behavior.

I don't have a list of news agencies you find "acceptable". This stuff isn't covered by Fox News. WaPo has a good article on it. Your own ignorance is your problem.

Would James have been prosecuted if she weren't Trump's enemy?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So you have nothing.

You are the one who is begging strangers to spoonfeed you basic information, because you know nothing about the topic. It is you who "has nothing".

 

[martybegan]

Pretty pathetic.

See how your governing philosophy creates the opportunity for corruption and weaponization?

Appointing loyalists to run agencies which are supposed to be nonpartisan, and using their positions to attack your political enemies.

Firing anyone who blows the whistle on the behavior.

I don't have a list of news agencies you find "acceptable". This stuff isn't covered by Fox News. WaPo has a good article on it. Your own ignorance is your problem.

Would James have been prosecuted if she weren't Trump's enemy?

They haven't been "non-partisan" in a long time, stop lying.

With that, the rest of your drivel is worthless.

 

[Marener]

They haven't been "non-partisan" in a long time, stop lying.

With that, the rest of your drivel is worthless.

Oh? Tell me how partisan the former FHFA administrators were? That’s right. You never heard about any of them because they never did anything to get any attention. You’re just making shit up.

But here’s a hack whom Trump appointed to go after his political enemies.

You going to deny that?

Of course you are. Because you’re a hack.

 

[martybegan]

Oh? Tell me how partisan the former FHFA administrators were? That’s right. You never heard about any of them because they never did anything to get any attention. You’re just making shit up.

But here’s a hack whom Trump appointed to go after his political enemies.

You going to deny that?

Of course you are. Because you’re a hack.

These are political appointees from previous administrations. Then you add the fact the overall civil service is heavily democrat.

You like the way things work because Democrat presidents get to do what they want and Republican ones have to fight their own branch of government.

Just admit it.

 

[Marener]

These are political appointees from previous administrations. Then you add the fact the overall civil service is heavily democrat.

You like the way things work because Democrat presidents get to do what they want and Republican ones have to fight their own branch of government.

Just admit it.

So aside from your belief in their political leanings, what did they do that was actually political?

I liked the way things used to work because we didn't have to worry about someone appointing a hack at FHFA digging into records to attack political opponents. I liked the way things used to work because we had people in government who would be on the lookout for ethical violations.

You don't think that is the way things should work.

Yes, I think presidents should have to fight their own branch if they want to weaponize government.

 

[martybegan]

So aside from your belief in their political leanings, what did they do that was actually political?

I liked the way things used to work because we didn't have to worry about someone appointing a hack at FHFA digging into records to attack political opponents. I liked the way things used to work because we had people in government who would be on the lookout for ethical violations.

You don't think that is the way things should work.

Yes, I think presidents should have to fight their own branch if they want to weaponize government.

Trump has to fight his own branch when he executes his own lawful agenda.

Again the rest of your tripe is just that.

 

[Marener]

Trump has to fight his own branch when he executes his own lawful agenda.

Again the rest of your tripe is just that.

Is his agenda to dig up anything he can use to go after his political enemies like Pulte is doing?

 

[Dagoth-Ur]

You are the one who is begging strangers to spoonfeed you basic information, because you know nothing about the topic. It is you who "has nothing".

So you have nothing.

 

[Mick2]

Bad actor. Don’t be annoying.

Your inability to spell is not my problem.

Trump says to prosecute Letitia James. The prosecutor says there’s no case.

She should be prosecuted. She tried to fine Trump $300 million for some imaginary "fraud" where she couldn't cite a single victim of fraud. The appeals court struck the fine completely down ruling it violated the Constitution. She should be in prison.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So you have nothing.

You have nothing and are begging me to spoonfeed you.

On your knees.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

She should be prosecuted

Yet you couldn't argue why if your life depended on it.

 

[Marener]

Your inability to spell is not my problem.

She should be prosecuted. She tried to fine Trump $300 million for some imaginary "fraud" where she couldn't cite a single victim of fraud. The appeals court struck the fine completely down ruling it violated the Constitution. She should be in prison.

What does that have to do with Trump telling the DoJ to prosecute her for mortgage paperwork?

 

[OODA_Loop]

What does that have to do with Trump telling the DoJ to prosecute her for mortgage paperwork?

If you pull the wrong dog's tail you are likely to get bit.

 

[Marener]

If you pull the wrong dog's tail you are likely to get bit.

So you’re saying Trump is a dog?

 

[OODA_Loop]

So you’re saying Trump is a dog?

Yes you finally have him. He is a dog.

 

[Marener]

Yes you finally have him. He is a dog.

Some of you still pretend like Trump is trying to run an ethical, competent government.

I like people like you who just admit that it’s a corrupt cesspool.